Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

Select Sr Living Coon Rapids

11350 Martin Street Nw, Coon Rapids, MN 55433 · Map
Licensed for 90 residents · SELECT SR LVG COON RAPIDS LLC

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Select Sr Living Coon Rapids is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Coon Rapids, Minnesota. It is licensed for 90 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
90 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility dementia care
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Minnesota typically starts at $3,900 to $8,600 a month. Based on 40 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Care and services

From the community’s website

What Select Sr Living Coon Rapids says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.

  • 3 meals a day. 3 meals per day, 7 days per week (page, checked Oct 15, 2026)
  • Smoke-free. Smoke-free environment (page, checked Oct 15, 2026)

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

3Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Oct 28, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 90 residents

Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 425493, current license dated May 1, 2026. Licensee SELECT SR LVG COON RAPIDS LLC.

Nearest emergency room

2.8 miles

Mercy Hospital, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Select Sr Living Coon Rapids this community90Not publishedActive3 substantiated
Boden Sr Living - Coon Rapids0.3 mi54Not publishedActive2 substantiated
Rejoyce Health Care0.4 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Tr Homes0.4 mi5Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Epiphany Assisted Living0.5 mi75Not publishedActive1 substantiated
State inspection record3 substantiated
Last evaluation
October 28, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
3 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
2 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (October 28, 2025, state report RML411)

MDH: “On October 20, 2025, through October 28, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed October 28, 2025: 11 correction orders

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain an effective infection control program to comply with acceptable health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control, by not cleaning shared equipment, and not performing appropriate hand hygiene, for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to maintain an effective infection control program to comply with acceptable health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control, by not cleaning shared equipment, and not performing appropriate hand hygiene, for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B). This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

  • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident record included a discharge summary with the required content for one of two discharged residents (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident record included a discharge summary with the required content for one of two discharged residents (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the current Minnesota Fire Code Provisions.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the current Minnesota Fire Code Provisions. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 1060: 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a written notice with the required content for an emergency relocation to the resident, legal representative, or designated representative for one of one the licensee's residents (R3).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a written notice with the required content for an emergency relocation to the resident, legal representative, or designated representative for one of one the licensee's residents (R3). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. [...]”

Show all 11
  • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed supervision of an unlicensed personnel within 30 calendar days of beginning to provide delegated tasks for one of three unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed supervision of an unlicensed personnel within 30 calendar days of beginning to provide delegated tasks for one of three unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted an admission assessment and ongoing nursing assessments not to exceed every 90-days for two of five residents (R2 and R6).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted an admission assessment and ongoing nursing assessments not to exceed every 90-days for two of five residents (R2 and R6). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for one of four residents (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for one of four residents (R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”

  • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered per prescriber orders for one of five residents (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered per prescriber orders for one of five residents (R2). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

  • Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure prescription medications were securely locked in a substantially constructed compartment and permitted only authorized personnel to have access.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure prescription medications were securely locked in a substantially constructed compartment and permitted only authorized personnel to have access. [...]”

    Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide documentation in the resident's record regarding the disposition of medication to include the medication strength, prescription number, quantity, date of disposition, and names of staff and other individuals involved in the disposition for one of three discharged residents (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide documentation in the resident's record regarding the disposition of medication to include the medication strength, prescription number, quantity, date of disposition, and names of staff and other individuals involved in the disposition for one of three discharged residents (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd.2. (a) - Fire Protection And PhysicalEnvironment): $500.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • May 18, 2023: report T93611 · 24 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed May 18, 2023: 24 correction orders

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared according to the Minnesota Food Code. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

    • Tag 485: 144G.41 Subd 1. (13) (i) (A) and (C) Minimum Requirements Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to offer at least three nutritious meals daily, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United Stated Department of Agriculture (USDA) guidelines, including seasonal fresh fruit and fresh vegetables and failed to ensure a breakfast menu was prepared a week in advance and provided to the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to offer at least three nutritious meals daily, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United Stated Department of Agriculture (USDA) guidelines, including seasonal fresh fruit and fresh vegetables and failed to ensure a breakfast menu was prepared a week in advance and provided to the residents. This had the potential to affect all memory care residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program that complied with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control related to gloving and hand hygiene for three of three

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program that complied with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control related to gloving and hand hygiene for three of three unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-B, ULP-F and ULP-G). In addition, the licensee failed to ensure staff disinfected shared equipment. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

    • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for one of two residents (R2) reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for one of two residents (R2) reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained the required content for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained the required content for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    Show all 24
    • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included baseline testing and screening for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F) with employee records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included baseline testing and screening for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F) with employee records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

    • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have awritten emergency preparedness plan (EPP) available to staff for utilization during an emergency.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have awritten emergency preparedness plan (EPP) available to staff for utilization during an emergency. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

    • Tag 700: 144G.43 Subdivision 1 Resident record Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure five of five

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure five of five resident's (R5, R9, R10, R11, and R12) personal health and medical information was kept private. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Resident records, whether written or electronic, must be protected against loss, tampering, or unauthorized disclosure in compliance with chapter 13 and other applicable relevant federal and state laws. [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the facility's fire safety and evacuation plan with required elements.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on record review and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the facility's fire safety and evacuation plan with required elements. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a background study (BGS) was submitted and a clearance received in affiliation with the assisted living with dementia care licensee's current health facility identification (HFID) for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP-F).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a background study (BGS) was submitted and a clearance received in affiliation with the assisted living with dementia care licensee's current health facility identification (HFID) for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP-F). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

    • Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (a) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations were completed for all required skill areas, prior to providing services, for one of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-F) reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations were completed for all required skill areas, prior to providing services, for one of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-F) reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”

    • Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure required competencies were completed for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B and

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure required competencies were completed for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B and ULP-F). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure staff providing services completed an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing services for three of three employees (registered nurse (RN)-A, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-F) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure staff providing services completed an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing services for three of three employees (registered nurse (RN)-A, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-F) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure annual training included all required topics for each 12 months of employment for one of one employee (registered nurse (RN)-A). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

    • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review the licensee failed to provide evidence of annual dementia care training on required topics for one of one employee (registered nurse (RN)-A). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medication administration was documented accurately in the medication administration record (MAR) for one of six residents (R4).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medication administration was documented accurately in the medication administration record (MAR) for one of six residents (R4). [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) documented training and/or competencies for one of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-F) who would provide medications for residents with unplanned time away from home when a licensed nurse was not available.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) documented training and/or competencies for one of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-F) who would provide medications for residents with unplanned time away from home when a licensed nurse was not available. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”

    • Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to store prescription medication securely and permit only authorized personnel to have access for two of eleven

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to store prescription medication securely and permit only authorized personnel to have access for two of eleven memory care residents (R2, R3) This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

      Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

    • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure time sensitive medications were dated when opened for one of three residents (R1).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure time sensitive medications were dated when opened for one of three residents (R1). In addition, the licensee failed to ensure to discard expired medication for two of six residents (R5 and R15). [...]”

      Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement a treatment or therapy management plan to include all required content and failed to include all treatments or therapies ordered for one of three residents (R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement a treatment or therapy management plan to include all required content and failed to include all treatments or therapies ordered for one of three residents (R2). [...]”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 2040: 144G.81 Subdivision 1 Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk assessment of the physical environment on and around the property.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on record review and interview, the licensee failed to provide a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk assessment of the physical environment on and around the property. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care that has a secured dementia care unit must meet the requirements of section 144G.45 and the following additional requirements: (1) a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk must be performed on and around [...]”

    • Tag 2320: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (b) Appropriate care and services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review the licensee failed to ensure unlicensed personnel (ULP) followed appropriate medication administration procedures for one of four employees (ULP-B) observed during medication administration. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Residents have the right to receive health care and other assisted living services with continuity from people who are properly trained and competent to perform their duties and in sufficient numbers to adequately provide the services agreed to in the [...]”

    • Tag 2350: 144G.91 Subd. 7 Courteous treatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure resident's property was treated with courtesy and respect when staff used a resident's blood glucose machine (R14) to check blood sugar readings for another resident (R4) observed during medication pass.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure resident's property was treated with courtesy and respect when staff used a resident's blood glucose machine (R14) to check blood sugar readings for another resident (R4) observed during medication pass. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be treated with courtesy and respect, and to have the resident's property treated with respect”

    From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

    Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

  • April 11, 2025 · report HL257298123M · MDH finding: Substantiated, facility responsibility
    Details

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated.”

    “The facility was responsible for the maltreatment.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect substantiated (facility responsibility).

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The facility was responsible for the maltreatment. The resident was observed with increased confusion and later during overnight safety checks was not found in his room. The facility did not initiate a search for the missing resident and remained unaware of his whereabouts until the next morning when police contacted the facility. The resident had been found deceased outside in the neighborhood.”

    Action taken by facility: “The facility made updates to the missing resident facility policy and provided all staff training on the policy.”

    Action taken by MDH: “The responsible party will be notified of their right to appeal the maltreatment finding. The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”

    Survey completed March 18, 2025: 1 correction order

    • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one resident reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one resident reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and the facility was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”

      Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

  • October 21, 2024 · report HL257294561M · MDH finding: Substantiated, facility responsibility
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when they failed to refill medication and the resident missed six weeks of his anti-psychotic medication. The resident experienced an increase in mental health behaviors and was transported to the hospital for evaluation.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated.”

    “The facility was responsible for the maltreatment.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect substantiated (facility responsibility).

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The facility was responsible for the maltreatment. The facility had no system in place to ensure medication was available to be administered as prescribed. The resident missed 54 doses of his anti-psychotic medication and experienced a mental health crisis.”

    Action taken by facility: “None.”

    Action taken by MDH: “The responsible party will be notified of their right to appeal the maltreatment finding. The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”

    Survey completed August 14, 2024: 1 correction order

    • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and the facility was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”

      Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

  • August 8, 2022 · report HL25729001M
Unsubstantiated investigations (2)
  • July 31, 2025 · report HL257292242M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when the resident was sent to the hospital in soiled clothes and was found with pressure injuries on his coccyx (tailbone).”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. Although the resident had a wound on his coccyx when he was sent to the hospital after a fall, there was not a preponderance of evidence that neglect occurred. The resident was assessed by a facility nurse one day before the incident. Facility staff provided care based on the resident's plan of care and preferences.”

    Action taken by facility: “A facility nurse assessed the resident a day prior to the incident. When the resident fell, facility staff called 911 and he was sent to the emergency room.”

    Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”

    Survey completed July 9, 2025: no correction orders issued.

  • July 15, 2024 · report HL257291621M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when the facility failed to assess and intervene when the resident had a significant change of condition. In addition, the resident fell because staff failed to use a sling for transfers.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. Facility staff provided care according to the resident's plan of care and facility policies and procedures. Facility staff updated the nurse when the resident refused breakfast and did not want to get up for the day. In the time frame of the allegation of a fall, there was no evidence the resident fell or fell from a sling.”

    Action taken by facility: “The facility reviewed their protocols and procedures.”

    Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”

    Survey completed June 5, 2024: no correction orders issued.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 90 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee SELECT SR LVG COON RAPIDS LLC
License type
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
License number
425493
License status
Active
Current license dated
2026-05-01
Licensed capacity
90
Licensee
SELECT SR LVG COON RAPIDS LLC
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Kristi Umberger

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.8 mi, nursing home 2.0 mi, pharmacy 0.3 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Mercy Hospital, Coon Rapids. 2.8 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Park River Estates Care Center, Coon Rapids. 2.0 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Mary T Home Health, Coon Rapids. 0.8 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Cub Pharmacy. 0.3 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55433 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Fmc - Coon Rapids, Coon Rapids, 2.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Mississippi Gateway Dialysis, Coon Rapids, 2.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fmc Dialysis - North Suburban, Coon Rapids, 3.4 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
23 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55433.
Mary T Hospice, office in Coon Rapids, 0.9 miles away, straight line
Olive Grove Hospice LLC, office in Blaine, 6.3 miles away, straight line
North Memorial Home Hlth Hospc, office in Robbinsdale, 11.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Group Health Inc, Coon Rapids. 0.3 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in April 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  3. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  4. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  5. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  6. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteSee above
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Select Sr Living Coon Rapids provide?

Select Sr Living Coon Rapids is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Coon Rapids, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 90 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Select Sr Living Coon Rapids?

No. We publish state licensing details for Select Sr Living Coon Rapids but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Select Sr Living Coon Rapids cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Select Sr Living Coon Rapids does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Select Sr Living Coon Rapids?

Use Select Sr Living Coon Rapids's website, selectseniorliving.net, or visit at 11350 Martin Street Nw, Coon Rapids, MN 55433.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid