Lilisity

Assisted Living

Safe Harbor Residential Care H

9812 Ford Circle, St. Louis Park, MN 55426 · Map
Licensed for 4 residents · SAFE HARBOR RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME LLC

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Safe Harbor Residential Care H is a state-licensed assisted living community in St. Louis Park, Minnesota. It is licensed for 4 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
4 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,500 to $4,400/moTypical assisted living start in Hennepin County, from 18 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Sep 5, 2024. See the record

License

Active, 4 residents

Assisted Living Facility 424268, current license dated Feb 1, 2026. Licensee SAFE HARBOR RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME LLC.

Nearest emergency room

3.5 miles

Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Safe Harbor Residential Care H this community4Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Sister Support0.5 mi4Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Epic Residential Care0.6 mi5Not publishedActiveNo record
Syncare Joy Home0.7 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Minnesota Wellness Center0.7 mi4Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
September 5, 2024
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (September 5, 2024, state report L3E311)

MDH: “On September 3, 2024, through September 5, 2024, Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider, and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed September 5, 2024: 9 correction orders

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

    Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

  • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which included a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) or other evidence of TB screening such as a blood test, for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which included a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) or other evidence of TB screening such as a blood test, for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

  • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and failed to provide the required drills.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on the interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and failed to provide the required drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 820: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (g) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, pattern scope, scope/level letter H · correction period: Immediate
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure physical facility elements did not constitute a distinct hazard to life.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure physical facility elements did not constitute a distinct hazard to life. The licensee failed to provide a resident bedroom with the minimum window opening meeting the minimum state standard for egress. This affected the occupied resident in bedrooms 2 and 3 on the main level. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(g) Existing construction or elements, including assisted living facilities that were registered as housing with services establishments under chapter 144D prior to August 1, 2021, shall be permitted to continue in use provided such use does not constitute a [...]”

Show all 9
  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a background study (BGS) was submitted and received in affiliation with the assisted living license for one of one employee (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a background study (BGS) was submitted and received in affiliation with the assisted living license for one of one employee (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a written service plan was revised to reflect the current services provided for one of two residents (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a written service plan was revised to reflect the current services provided for one of two residents (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1820: 144G.71 Subd. 13 Prescriptions Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain current medication orders for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to maintain current medication orders for one of one resident (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected [...]”

    Rule cited: “There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident.”

  • Tag 1830: 144G.71 Subd. 14 Renewal of prescriptions Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to renew prescriptions at least every 12 months for one of one resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to renew prescriptions at least every 12 months for one of one resident (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that [...]”

    Rule cited: “Prescriptions must be renewed at least every 12 months or more frequently as indicated by the assessment in subdivision 2. Prescriptions for controlled substances must comply with chapter 152.”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • September 16, 2020: report 9WGZ11 · 3 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed September 16, 2020: 3 correction orders

    • Tag 825: 144A.4791, Subd. 1 HBOR Notification to Client Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the license failed to receive an acknowledgment of receipt with the current home care Bill of Rights for one of one client (#1) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Subdivision 1.Home care bill of rights; notification to client. (a) The home care provider shall provide the client or the client's representative a written notice of the rights under section 144A.44 before the date that services are first provided to that [...]”

    • Tag 900: 144A.4792, Subd. 1 Medication Management; Comprehensive Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop, implement, and maintain current medication management policies and procedures that were developed under the supervision and direction of a registered nurse consistent with current practice standards and guidelines.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop, implement, and maintain current medication management policies and procedures that were developed under the supervision and direction of a registered nurse consistent with current practice standards and guidelines. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Subdivision 1.Medication management services; comprehensive home care license. (a) This subdivision applies only to home care providers with a comprehensive home care license that provide medication management services to clients. [...]”

    • Tag 1170: 144A.4796, Subd. 2 Content of Orientation Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure two of two employees (A and B) received orientation to home care licensing requirements and regulations before providing home care services to clients with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure two of two employees (A and B) received orientation to home care licensing requirements and regulations before providing home care services to clients with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Subd. 2.Content. (a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of sections 144A.43 to 144A.4798; (2) introduction and review of all the provider's policies and procedures related to the provision of home care services by the [...]”

    From MDH’s letter: no immediate fines.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 4 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee SAFE HARBOR RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME LLC
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
424268
License status
Active
Current license dated
2026-02-01
Licensed capacity
4
Licensee
SAFE HARBOR RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME LLC
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Meeka Singh

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.5 mi, nursing home 1.5 mi, pharmacy 1.7 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, Saint Louis Park. 3.5 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
The Villas at St Louis Park, Saint Louis Park. 1.5 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Nightingale Home Healthcare, Minnetonka. 1.3 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 1.7 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55426 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita St Louis Park Dialysis Center, Saint Louis Park, 2.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Concerto Minnesota LLC, Saint Louis Park, 2.8 miles away, straight line
Fmc Dialysis - Golden Valley, Golden Valley, 3.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
18 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55426.
Superior Hospice Inc., office in Golden Valley, 1.6 miles away, straight line
St Croix Hospice, office in Hopkins, 2.5 miles away, straight line
Lifesprk Hospice LLC, office in Saint Louis Park, 2.9 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 2 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Twin Cities Physicians Professional Corporation, Golden Valley. 3.3 miles away, straight line. 3 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding very low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Safe Harbor Residential Care H provide?

Safe Harbor Residential Care H is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in St. Louis Park, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 4 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Safe Harbor Residential Care H?

No. We publish state licensing details for Safe Harbor Residential Care H but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Safe Harbor Residential Care H cost?

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Safe Harbor Residential Care H does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Safe Harbor Residential Care H?

Visit Safe Harbor Residential Care H at 9812 Ford Circle, St. Louis Park, MN 55426.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid