Raliance Group Home

Last evaluation

March 5, 2025

Evaluations on record

1

Investigations substantiated

0 kept 7 years

Inconclusive

0 kept 4 years

Unsubstantiated

0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (March 5, 2025, state report 0T9511)

MDH: “On March 3, 2025, through March 5, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider.”

Survey completed March 5, 2025: 6 correction orders

• Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

  Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

• Tag 700: 144G.43 Subdivision 1 Resident record Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure resident's personal health and medical information was kept private.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure resident's personal health and medical information was kept private. This had the potential to affect all residents residing within the facility. [...]”

  Rule cited: “(b) Resident records, whether written or electronic, must be protected against loss, tampering, or unauthorized disclosure in compliance with chapter 13 and other applicable relevant federal and state laws. [...]”

• Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide appropriate disposal areas for smoking materials, and to maintain egress window hardware in compliance with Minnesota State Fire Code under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide appropriate disposal areas for smoking materials, and to maintain egress window hardware in compliance with Minnesota State Fire Code under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511. This had the potential to affect residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

  Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

• Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted a reassessment, not to exceed 14 calendar days from the initiation of services, for one of two residents (R1) and failed to ensure the RN conducted ongoing resident assessment and reassessment, not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last date of the assessment for one of two residents (R1).

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted a reassessment, not to exceed 14 calendar days from the initiation of services, for one of two residents (R1) and failed to ensure the RN conducted ongoing resident assessment and reassessment, not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last date of the assessment for one of two residents (R1). [...]”

  Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

• Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure that physician orders were transcribed accurately for

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure that physician orders were transcribed accurately for one of two residents (R1) and that unlicensed personnel (ULP) followed appropriate medication administration procedures for one of two residents (R1), and failed to ensure This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued [...]”

  Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

• Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure prescription medications were securely locked in a substantially constructed compartment and permitted only authorized personnel to have

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure prescription medications were securely locked in a substantially constructed compartment and permitted only authorized personnel to have access. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. [...]”

  Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; MDH granted the assisted living license; no immediate fines.

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.