Lilisity

Assisted Living

Open Heart Residence Limited

4441 Park Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55407 · Map
Licensed for 4 residents · OPEN HEART RESIDENCE LIMITED

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Open Heart Residence Limited is a state-licensed assisted living community in Minneapolis, Minnesota. It is licensed for 4 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
4 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,500 to $4,400/moTypical assisted living start in Hennepin County, from 18 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

1Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Dec 12, 2024. See the record

License

Active, 4 residents

Assisted Living Facility 421679, current license dated Aug 1, 2025. Licensee OPEN HEART RESIDENCE LIMITED.

Nearest emergency room

2.0 miles

Abbott Northwestern Hospital, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Open Heart Residence Limited this community4Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Wellness Homes, Chicago Avenue0.4 mi10Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Angelwood Assisted Living0.6 mi5Not publishedActiveNo record
Cosmo Home Healthcare Services0.7 mi4Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Paradise Care Homes, 2nd Avenue South0.7 mi6Not publishedActive1 substantiated
State inspection record1 substantiated
Last evaluation
December 12, 2024
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
1 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
1 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (December 12, 2024, state report UT5A11)

MDH: “On December 9, 2024, through December 12, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider.”

Survey completed December 12, 2024: 8 correction orders

  • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which included a baseline testing for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which included a baseline testing for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving services under the assisted living license. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the current Minnesota Fire

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the current Minnesota Fire Code provisions. These deficient conditions had the ability to affect all staff and residents. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) provide smoke alarms outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of bedrooms; (iii) provide smoke [...]”

  • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents. This deficient condition had the potential to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan (FSEP) with the required content.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan (FSEP) with the required content. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

Show all 8
  • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a current written service plan was signed to reflect the current services provided for one of two residents (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a current written service plan was signed to reflect the current services provided for one of two residents (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management record for

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for one of two residents (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications included an original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or beyond-use date of a time-dated drug for one of two residents (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure medications included an original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or beyond-use date of a time-dated drug for one of two residents (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • November 18, 2021: report TU6Z11 · 24 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed February 17, 2022: 6 correction orders

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action is required.”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action is required.”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and execute an assisted living written contract with the residents to include all required content for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and execute an assisted living written contract with the residents to include all required content for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn (re-issued) Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations contained all the required training for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-C and ULP-D) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations contained all the required training for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-C and ULP-D) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”

    • Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn (re-issued) Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations contained all the required training for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-C and ULP-D) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations contained all the required training for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-C and ULP-D) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”

    • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED (re-issued) Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure all direct care staff completed at least eight (8) hours initial training in dementia care for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-C and ULP-D) with employee records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure all direct care staff completed at least eight (8) hours initial training in dementia care for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-C and ULP-D) with employee records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

    Survey completed November 18, 2021: 18 correction orders

    • Tag 110: 144G.10 Subdivision 1a Assisted living director license required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: IMMEDIATE
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employment of a licensed assisted living director (LALD).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employment of a licensed assisted living director (LALD). This had the potential to affect all three residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must employ an assisted living director licensed or permitted by the Board of Executives for Long Term Services and Supports.”

    • Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the Uniform Disclosure of Assisted Living Services and Amenities (UDALSA) was accurate for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the Uniform Disclosure of Assisted Living Services and Amenities (UDALSA) was accurate for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all three residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”

    • Tag 460: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a means for three of three residents (R1, R3, R4) to request assistance for health and safety needs as required.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a means for three of three residents (R1, R3, R4) to request assistance for health and safety needs as required. The licensee did not have a system in place for residents at the facility to request assistance for health and safety needs 24 hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all three residents at the facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(5) provide a means for residents to request assistance for health and safety needs 24 hours per day, seven days per week; (6) allow residents the ability to furnish and decorate the resident's unit within the terms of the assisted living contract; (7) permit [...]”

    • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required staffing plan was developed and a staff schedule posted in a central location, potentially affecting the licensee's three current residents, staff and any visitors of the licensee.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the required staffing plan was developed and a staff schedule posted in a central location, potentially affecting the licensee's three current residents, staff and any visitors of the licensee. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This had the potential to affect all three residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    Show all 18
    • Tag 490: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (ii)-(vii) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a daily program of social and recreational activities.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a daily program of social and recreational activities. This had the potential to affect all three residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(ii) weekly housekeeping; (iii) weekly laundry service; (iv) upon the request of the resident, provide direct or reasonable assistance with arranging for transportation to medical and social services appointments, shopping, and other recreation, and provide [...]”

    • Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure and contact information for the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care and Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure and contact information for the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care and Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities. This had the potential to affect all three residents receiving assisted living services, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and e-mail contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

    • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure implementation of an individual abuse prevention plan for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure implementation of an individual abuse prevention plan for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

    • Tag 640: 144G.42 Subd. 7 Posting information for reporting suspected c Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post the required content in common areas to include: 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided by the assisted living facility and the reporting number for the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) to report suspected maltreatment of a vulnerable adult under section 626.557.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to post the required content in common areas to include: 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided by the assisted living facility and the reporting number for the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) to report suspected maltreatment of a vulnerable adult under section 626.557. This had the potential to affect all three residents receiving assisted living services, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The facility shall support protection and safety through access to the state's systems for reporting suspected criminal activity and suspected vulnerable adult maltreatment by: (1) posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided [...]”

    • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content and failed to post an emergency preparedness plan prominently.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content and failed to post an emergency preparedness plan prominently. This had the potential to affect all three residents receiving services under the assisted living license, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

    • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 1, isolated scope, scope/level letter A · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to complete a discharge summary for one of one discharged resident (R2) reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to complete a discharge summary for one of one discharged resident (R2) reviewed. This practice resulted in a level one violation (a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved or the situation has occurred only [...]”

      Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans, to provide required training to residents and employees for fire safety and evacuation, and to conduct required employee evacuation drills.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans, to provide required training to residents and employees for fire safety and evacuation, and to conduct required employee evacuation drills. This had the potential to affect all current residents, visitors and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and execute an assisted living written contract with the residents to include all required content for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and execute an assisted living written contract with the residents to include all required content for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations contained all the required training for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-C and ULP-D) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations contained all the required training for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-C and ULP-D) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”

    • Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations contained all the required training for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-C and ULP-D) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”

    • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Fourteen (14) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure all direct care staff completed at least eight (8) hours initial training in dementia care for one of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-D) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure all direct care staff completed at least eight (8) hours initial training in dementia care for one of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-D) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive nursing assessment with all required content for one of one residents (R1) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive nursing assessment with all required content for one of one residents (R1) with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all three residents at the facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

    • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure documentation of the disposition of medications for one of one discharged resident (R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure documentation of the disposition of medications for one of one discharged resident (R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

    Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

  • August 24, 2023 · report HL371342442C
    Details

    Survey completed August 24, 2023: 2 correction orders

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 820: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (g) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide facilities that were not a distinct hazard to life. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(g) Existing construction or elements, including assisted living facilities that were registered as housing with services establishments under chapter 144D prior to August 1, 2021, shall be permitted to continue in use provided such use does not constitute a [...]”

Unsubstantiated investigations (1)
  • April 16, 2024 · report HL371348928C
    Details

    Survey completed March 26, 2024: no correction orders issued.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 4 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee OPEN HEART RESIDENCE LIMITED
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
421679
License status
Active
Current license dated
2025-08-01
Licensed capacity
4
Licensee
OPEN HEART RESIDENCE LIMITED
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Abdirizak Osman

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.0 mi, nursing home 1.2 mi, pharmacy 0.2 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis. 2.0 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Grand Avenue Rest Home, Minneapolis. 1.2 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Caremark Home Health Care LLC, Minneapolis. 1.8 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 0.2 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55407 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Fmc Dialysis - South Minneapolis, Minneapolis, 0.7 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Minneapolis Uptown Dialysis, Minneapolis, 1.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Fmcna Park Avenue Dialysis Center, Minneapolis, 2.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Hospice
21 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55407.
Allina Health Hospice & Palliative Care, office in Minneapolis, 1.9 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Brighton Hospice, office in Saint Louis Park, 3.9 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, office in Saint Louis Park, 3.9 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Abigail Houts, MD, Minneapolis. 0.9 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Open Heart Residence Limited provide?

Open Heart Residence Limited is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 4 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Open Heart Residence Limited?

No. We publish state licensing details for Open Heart Residence Limited but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Open Heart Residence Limited cost?

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Open Heart Residence Limited does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Open Heart Residence Limited?

Visit Open Heart Residence Limited at 4441 Park Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55407.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid