Lilisity

Assisted Living

Nuvision Homecare Services, Zenith Avenue North

4568 Zenith Avenue North, Robbinsdale, MN 55422 · Map
Licensed for 4 residents · NUVISION HOMECARE SERVICES LLC

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Nuvision Homecare Services, Zenith Avenue North is a state-licensed assisted living community in Robbinsdale, Minnesota. It is licensed for 4 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
4 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,500 to $4,400/moTypical assisted living start in Hennepin County, from 18 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Oct 29, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 4 residents

Assisted Living Facility 421993, current license dated Aug 1, 2025. Licensee NUVISION HOMECARE SERVICES LLC.

Nearest emergency room

2.3 miles

North Memorial Health Hospital, rated 1 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Nuvision Homecare Services, Zenith Avenue North this community4Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Ozif Healthcare Services0.3 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Nuvision Homecare Services, Chowen Avenue North0.4 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Prestigious Care Homes, Ewing Avenue North0.5 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Unique Homes0.5 mi4Not publishedActive2 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
October 29, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
2 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (October 29, 2025, state report H4HS11)

MDH: “On October 27, 2025, through October 29, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed October 29, 2025: 11 correction orders

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving services under the assisted living with dementia license. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms that functioned and were interconnected so that the actuation of one alarm caused all alarms in the dwelling unit to actuate.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms that functioned and were interconnected so that the actuation of one alarm caused all alarms in the dwelling unit to actuate. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

  • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2-3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the portable fire extinguishers.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the portable fire extinguishers. This deficient condition had the potential to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

  • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 1, pattern scope, scope/level letter B · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents. This deficient condition had the potential to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

Show all 11
  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training and drills.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training and drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1330: 144G.60 Subd. 4 (b) Unlicensed personnel Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations were completed for all

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations were completed for all required skill areas, prior to providing services, for two of two employees (house manager/unlicensed personnel (HM/ULP)-B, ULP-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Unlicensed personnel performing delegated nursing tasks in an assisted living facility must: (1) have successfully completed training and demonstrated competency by successfully completing a written or oral test of the topics in section 144G.61, [...]”

  • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an employee received all required orientation topics to assisted living statutes before providing direct care services to residents for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an employee received all required orientation topics to assisted living statutes before providing direct care services to residents for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

  • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees completed at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment including the required topics, for one of two employees (house manager/unlicensed personnel (HM/ULP)-B).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees completed at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment including the required topics, for one of two employees (house manager/unlicensed personnel (HM/ULP)-B). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

  • Tag 1530: 144G.64 (a) (1-2) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure all staff received at least eight hours of initial training on dementia topics and two hours of mental illness and de-escalation training specified under paragraph (b), clauses

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure all staff received at least eight hours of initial training on dementia topics and two hours of mental illness and de-escalation training specified under paragraph (b), clauses (1) to (8) within 160 working hours of the employment start date as required for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following dementia care, mental illness, and de-escalation training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on dementia topics specified under [...]”

  • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to complete documentation of disposition of medications for one of one discharged resident (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to complete documentation of disposition of medications for one of one discharged resident (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 780 (144g.45 Subd.2 (a) (1) - Fire Protection And PhysicalEnvironment): $500.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • December 22, 2023: report RSPQ11 · 29 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed March 28, 2024: 14 correction orders

    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

    • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to perform the required annual and monthly maintenance on fire extinguishers and failed to provide adequately rated (size) portable fire extinguishers as required for the facility.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to perform the required annual and monthly maintenance on fire extinguishers and failed to provide adequately rated (size) portable fire extinguishers as required for the facility. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a fire safety and evacuation plan with the required elements.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop a fire safety and evacuation plan with the required elements. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    Show all 14
    • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

    • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1490: 144G.63 Subd. 4 Training required relating to dementia (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “All direct care staff and supervisors providing direct services must demonstrate an understanding of the training specified in section 144G.64.”

    • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

    • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

    • Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action needed.”

      Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”

    Survey completed December 22, 2023: 15 correction orders

    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records included all required content for two of two employees (house manager (HM)-B, unlicensed

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records included all required content for two of two employees (house manager (HM)-B, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D) with employee records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included baseline testing for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D), training for one of two new employees (ULP-D), and annual education for two of two employees (house manager (HM)-B and ULP-D).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included baseline testing for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D), training for one of two new employees (ULP-D), and annual education for two of two employees (house manager (HM)-B and ULP-D). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

    • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to perform the required annual and monthly maintenance on fire extinguishers and failed to provide adequately rated (size) portable fire extinguishers as required for the facility.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to perform the required annual and monthly maintenance on fire extinguishers and failed to provide adequately rated (size) portable fire extinguishers as required for the facility. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a fire safety and evacuation plan with the required elements, failed

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop a fire safety and evacuation plan with the required elements, failed to provide required employee training on fire safety and evacuation, and failed to conduct required evacuation drills as required. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    Show all 15
    • Tag 820: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (g) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Immediate
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure physical facility elements did not constitute a distinct hazard to life.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure physical facility elements did not constitute a distinct hazard to life. The licensee failed to provide resident bedrooms with the minimum window opening meeting the minimum state standard for egress. This affected the occupied resident bedroom #4 on the lower level. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(g) Existing construction or elements, including assisted living facilities that were registered as housing with services establishments under chapter 144D prior to August 1, 2021, shall be permitted to continue in use provided such use does not constitute a [...]”

    • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: IMMEDIATE
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a background study was submitted and received in affiliation with the assisted living license prior to staff providing services for four of five employees (house manager (HM)-B, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D, ULP-E).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a background study was submitted and received in affiliation with the assisted living license prior to staff providing services for four of five employees (house manager (HM)-B, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D, ULP-E). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

    • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing a delegated task within 30 days of providing services for two of two employees (house manager (HM)-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing a delegated task within 30 days of providing services for two of two employees (house manager (HM)-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees completed required orientation before providing services for two of two direct care employees (house manager (HM)-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees completed required orientation before providing services for two of two direct care employees (house manager (HM)-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1490: 144G.63 Subd. 4 Training required relating to dementia Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure staff received dementia training in the required areas for two of two employees (house manager (HM)-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure staff received dementia training in the required areas for two of two employees (house manager (HM)-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

      Rule cited: “All direct care staff and supervisors providing direct services must demonstrate an understanding of the training specified in section 144G.64.”

    • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received at least eight hours of annual training for each twelve months of employment for two of two employees (house manager (HM)-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received at least eight hours of annual training for each twelve months of employment for two of two employees (house manager (HM)-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

    • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide employees with the initial eight (8) hours of dementia training for two of two direct care employees (house manager (HM)-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide employees with the initial eight (8) hours of dementia training for two of two direct care employees (house manager (HM)-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). In addition, the licensee failed to provide employees with the required two hours of annual dementia care training for two of two direct care employees (HM-B and ULP-D). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review the licensee failed to ensure documentation included follow up on effectiveness of medications administered to relieve symptoms and meet resident needs for one of two residents (R3). [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to remove expired

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to remove expired medication from availability for use for two of two residents (R1, R2). In addition, the licensee failed to ensure time-sensitive medications were labeled with the date opened and medications were kept in the original containers for one of two residents (R1). [...]”

      Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

    • Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for treatments and therapies for one of one resident (R3).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “The licensee failed to maintain up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for treatments and therapies for one of one resident (R3). [...]”

      Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”

    Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $1,500.00.

    Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.

Unsubstantiated investigations (2)
  • October 31, 2024 · report HL371023544M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when they failed to supervise the resident's use of alcohol, placing the resident at risk for harm.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The resident was independent with decision making, with no legal guardian. The resident would leave the facility and partake in drinking alcohol off facility property to the point of inebriation. The facility assisted the resident as needed upon his return, communicated with his medical providers, encouraged alcohol treatment, and provided medications as ordered. The resident declined alcohol treatment.”

    Action taken by facility: “The facility monitored the resident for symptoms of being under the influence, provided safety interventions, communicated with his care team and physician. The facility administered the resident's monthly injection for alcohol abuse. The facility offered assistance in obtaining alcohol treatment.”

    Action taken by MDH: “No further action at this time.”

    Survey completed October 15, 2024: no correction orders issued.

  • September 18, 2024 · report HL371023803M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when they failed to administer medication as ordered.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The facility administered medication as directed and followed facility policies and procedure. There was not a preponderance of evidence to support that the actions of the facility staff met the definition of neglect.”

    Action taken by facility: “Following the incident, nursing staff conducted additional training with staff and reviewed proper medication administration procedures.”

    Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”

    Survey completed August 12, 2024: no correction orders issued.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 4 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee NUVISION HOMECARE SERVICES LLC
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
421993
License status
Active
Current license dated
2025-08-01
Licensed capacity
4
Licensee
NUVISION HOMECARE SERVICES LLC
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Carlos Smith

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.3 mi, nursing home 1.1 mi, pharmacy 3.2 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
North Memorial Health Hospital, Robbinsdale. 2.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 1 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Good Samaritan Society - Specialty Care Community, Robbinsdale. 1.1 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Good Samaritan Society - Home Care, Robbinsdale. 1.0 mile away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Hy-Vee Pharmacy. 3.2 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55422 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Fkc - Robbinsdale Dialysis, Robbinsdale, 1.0 mile away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Davita Robbinsdale Dialysis, Robbinsdale, 1.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fresenius Kidney Care Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Center, 2.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
28 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55422.
North Memorial Home Hlth Hospc, office in Robbinsdale, 1.5 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Moments Hospice, office in Golden Valley, 3.8 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars)
Grace Hospice, office in Minneapolis, 4.2 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Twin Cities Physicians Professional Corporation, Golden Valley. 3.4 miles away, straight line. 3 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively high, wildfire very low, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Nuvision Homecare Services, Zenith Avenue North provide?

Nuvision Homecare Services, Zenith Avenue North is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Robbinsdale, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 4 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Nuvision Homecare Services, Zenith Avenue North?

No. We publish state licensing details for Nuvision Homecare Services, Zenith Avenue North but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Nuvision Homecare Services, Zenith Avenue North cost?

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Nuvision Homecare Services, Zenith Avenue North does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Nuvision Homecare Services, Zenith Avenue North?

Visit Nuvision Homecare Services, Zenith Avenue North at 4568 Zenith Avenue North, Robbinsdale, MN 55422.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid