Noah Assisting Living

Last evaluation

May 7, 2026

Evaluations on record

2

Investigations substantiated

2 kept 7 years

Inconclusive

0 kept 4 years

Unsubstantiated

0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (May 7, 2026, state report 4ZTG11)

MDH: “On May 4, 2026, through May 7, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed May 7, 2026: 7 correction orders

• Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

  Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

• Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) with the required content for two of three residents (R2, R5).

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) with the required content for two of three residents (R2, R5). [...]”

  Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

• Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving services under the assisted living license. [...]”

  Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

• Tag 970: 144G.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the licensee's liability for health, safety, or personal property for three of three residents (R2, R3, R5).

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the licensee's liability for health, safety, or personal property for three of three residents (R2, R3, R5). [...]”

  Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”

• Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for two of three residents (R2, R5).

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for two of three residents (R2, R5). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at a pattern scope (when more than a limited number of resident's are affected, more than [...]”

  Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

• Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to document medication administration in resident records for one of two residents (R2).

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to document medication administration in resident records for one of two residents (R2). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a [...]”

  Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

• Tag 1820: 144G.71 Subd. 13 Prescriptions Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure there was a current, written, or electronically recorded prescription for prescribed medications that the assisted living facility was managing for one of two residents (R2).

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a current, written, or electronically recorded prescription for prescribed medications that the assisted living facility was managing for one of two residents (R2). [...]”

  Rule cited: “There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident.”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): No orders were issued for this inspection report.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

• October 15, 2025 · report HL358675582M · MDH finding: Substantiated, facility responsibility
  Details

  Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when the facility failed to provide proper shelter and supervision for the resident as required when facility staff left the facility with the other facility residents on an outing and left the resident unsupervised and locked out of the facility.”

  “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated.”

  “The facility was responsible for the maltreatment.”

  Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect substantiated (facility responsibility).

  MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The facility was responsible for the maltreatment. The resident was legally blind and declined participating in facility outings. When the resident declined an outing, the facility staff either made the resident leave the facility or had him wait outside as the facility staff locked the doors while they were on the outing with other residents, leaving no staff home for the resident to remain home. On one occasion, the resident's community support staff found him outside, locked out of the facility.”

  Action taken by facility: “No action taken.”

  Action taken by MDH: “The responsible party will be notified of their right to appeal the maltreatment finding. The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”

  Survey completed September 3, 2025: 3 correction orders

  • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review the licensee failed to ensure sufficient staffing at all times to cover 24 hours per day, seven days a week to all residents for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed. Facility staff took residents to an activity away from the facility and left R1 alone at the facility with no staff. This deficient practice had the potential for affect all residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

  • Tag 490: 144G.41 Subdivision 1b Minimum requirements; other required services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide activities based on individual preferences for a resident that was blind to meet the physical needs and create opportunity for participation in the community for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review, the licensee failed to provide activities based on individual preferences for a resident that was blind to meet the physical needs and create opportunity for participation in the community for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “All assisted living facilities must offer to provide or make available the following services to residents: (1) weekly housekeeping; (2) weekly laundry service; (3) upon the request of the resident, provide direct or reasonable assistance with arranging for [...]”

  • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one residents reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one residents reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and the facility was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”

    Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

• March 12, 2025 · report HL358676643M · MDH finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility
  Details

  Allegation, as written: “The Alleged Perpetrator (AP) abused a resident when the AP responded to a resident 's verbal aggression by fighting with the resident. The AP punched the resident and hit him in the head with an object, which caused injury to the resident in the form of cuts and bruising.”

  “The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was substantiated.”

  “The AP was responsible for the maltreatment.”

  Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: abuse substantiated (individual responsibility).

  MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. The AP received education and training on abuse prevention, the assisted living bill of rights, behavioral health, client boundaries, communication, and conflict resolution. The AP got into the resident's face to confront him about a peer argument, the resident punched the AP, who punched back and struck the resident with an object, causing injury.”

  Action taken by facility: “The facility nurse stated the AP was no longer associated with the facility but remained as part owner of the facility. The AP's personnel file indicated the facility "discharged" the AP from employment for physical abuse and fighting.”

  Action taken by MDH: “The facility was issued a correction order regarding the vulnerable adult's right to be free from maltreatment.”

  Survey completed February 27, 2025: 1 correction order

  • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and an individual person was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”

    Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 4 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.