Lilisity

Independent Living and Assisted Living and Memory Care

New Perspective Waconia

500 Cherry Street, Waconia, MN 55387 · Map
Licensed for 115 residents · NEW PERSPECTIVE WACONIA

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

New Perspective Waconia is a state-licensed independent living, assisted living, memory care community in Waconia, Minnesota. It is licensed for 115 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Independent LivingAlso assisted living, memory care
115 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility dementia care
From $1,790/moStarting price

Prices

Starting prices the community publishes, with the date we checked each one and a link to where it is published. Care charges are usually added after an assessment.

CareStarting atChecked
Assisted Living$1,790 /moOct 12, 2026
Memory Care$3,722 /moOct 12, 2026

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Minnesota typically starts at $3,900 to $8,600 a month. Based on 40 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Independent Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,100 to $3,300 a month. Based on 37 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Care and services

From the community’s website

What New Perspective Waconia says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.

  • Has a separate memory care unit, wing or neighborhood. Designed for those experiencing dementia or other memory impairments, our licensed and secured memory care neighborhood offers specially trained employees, intentional programming, unique community features, and more. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Offers respite or short-term stays. Respite Care (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Provides transportation. Transportation (page, checked Oct 15, 2026)
  • 3 meals a day. Three meals daily, plus snacks and special events (page, checked Oct 15, 2026)
  • Pets allowed. Pet-friendly community (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Apartment types named: studio, two-bedroom. Floor plan styles (studio, one- and two-bedroom) vary by location. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

2Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Jan 21, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 115 residents

Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 424645, current license dated Mar 1, 2026. Licensee NEW PERSPECTIVE WACONIA.

Nearest emergency room

0.2 miles

Ridgeview Medical Center, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
New Perspective Waconia this community115$1,790/moActive2 substantiated
Auburn Meadows0.1 mi75Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Good Samaritan Society Waconia0.2 mi140Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Nagel Assisted Living0.5 mi55Not publishedActive2 substantiated
The Haven at Peace Village7.9 mi41Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record2 substantiated
Last evaluation
January 21, 2026
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
2 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
1 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (January 21, 2026, state report O41I11)

MDH: “On January 20, 2026, through January 21, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed January 21, 2026: 2 correction orders

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure time sensitive medications included the opened or expiration date.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure time sensitive medications included the opened or expiration date. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a [...]”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): No orders were issued for this inspection report.

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $500.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • June 29, 2023: report G8KO11 · 18 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed June 29, 2023: 18 correction orders

    • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the staffing schedule was posted as required.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the staffing schedule was posted as required. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

    • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure infection control standards were followed for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP)-J, ULP-O) providing personal cares.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure infection control standards were followed for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP)-J, ULP-O) providing personal cares. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

    • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure individual abuse prevention plans (IAPP) were updated for two of four residents (R6, R7) with changes in condition.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure individual abuse prevention plans (IAPP) were updated for two of four residents (R6, R7) with changes in condition. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

    • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention and control program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The licensee failed to ensure screening for active TB (either a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) or blood test) were completed and documented for one of five employees (unlicensed personnel/ULP-D). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

    Show all 18
    • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms in all sleeping rooms This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff and residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms in all sleeping rooms This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff and residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

    • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed provide adequately rated portable fire extinguishers as required for the facility and failed to maintain fire extinguishers in accordance with MN State Fire Code as required by MN Statute 144G.45 Subd.2 (a)(2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed provide adequately rated portable fire extinguishers as required for the facility and failed to maintain fire extinguishers in accordance with MN State Fire Code as required by MN Statute 144G.45 Subd.2 (a)(2). This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide required employee training on fire safety and evacuation.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide required employee training on fire safety and evacuation. This had the potential to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 970: 144G.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1060: 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a written notice with the required content for an emergency relocation to the resident, legal representative, or designated representative.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a written notice with the required content for an emergency relocation to the resident, legal representative, or designated representative. Further, the licensee failed to notify the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) of resident relocation within four days for two of two residents (R1, R10). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. [...]”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure orientation to assisted living statutes included all the required content for two of five employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)- B, registered nurse (RN)-K).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure orientation to assisted living statutes included all the required content for two of five employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)- B, registered nurse (RN)-K). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an employee received all of the required annual training content for each 12 months of employment for one of five employees (registered nurse (RN)-K).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an employee received all of the required annual training content for each 12 months of employment for one of five employees (registered nurse (RN)-K). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

    • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure one of five employees (registered nurse (RN)-K) received the required amount of dementia care training in the required time frame.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure one of five employees (registered nurse (RN)-K) received the required amount of dementia care training in the required time frame. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

    • Tag 1690: 144G.71 Subdivision 1 Medication management services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed ensure the licensee's policy pertaining to the counting of controlled medications was followed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed ensure the licensee's policy pertaining to the counting of controlled medications was followed. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) This section applies only to assisted living facilities that provide medication management services. [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for one of five residents (R10).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for one of five residents (R10). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications included the open and/or expiration date for time sensitive medications for three of three residents (R7, R15, R17) and failed to ensure medications

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications included the open and/or expiration date for time sensitive medications for three of three residents (R7, R15, R17) and failed to ensure medications were not used past their expiration date. [...]”

      Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

    • Tag 2410: 144G.91 Subd. 13 Personal and treatment privacy Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure two of two residents (R5, R2) were treated with dignity and respect when unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C provided treatment and medication management services to residents in a public setting.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure two of two residents (R5, R2) were treated with dignity and respect when unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C provided treatment and medication management services to residents in a public setting. In addition, the licensee failed to ensure privacy was maintained for two of two residents (R3, R10) during personal cares. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to consideration of their privacy, individuality, and cultural identity as related to their social, religious, and psychological well-being. [...]”

    Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

  • October 24, 2024 · report HL304154762M · MDH finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “A facility unlicensed staff member, alleged perpetrator (AP), financially exploited six residents, resident #1, resident #2, resident #3, resident #4, resident #5, and resident #6, when the AP took narcotic medication from the six residents for personal use.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated.”

    “The AP was responsible for the maltreatment.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: financial exploitation substantiated (individual responsibility).

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. The AP financially exploited resident #1, resident #2, resident #3, resident #4, and resident #5. There was a pattern of increased dispensing of Oxycodone (opioid narcotic) to resident #1, resident #2, resident #3, resident #4, and resident #5 by the AP during the night shift when the AP worked. In addition, resident #1, resident #3 and resident #4 denied receiving any Oxycodone at night. It could not be determined if the AP financially exploited resident #6.”

    Action taken by facility: “The facility notified the families of the residents involved in the financial exploitation. The AP is no longer employed by the facility.”

    Action taken by MDH: “The facility was issued a correction order regarding the vulnerable adult's right to be free from maltreatment.”

    Survey completed October 1, 2024: 1 correction order

    • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one residents reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one residents reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and an individual person was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”

      Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

  • May 9, 2023 · report HL304155423M · MDH finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP), facility staff, neglected resident #1 and resident #2 when he administered his own personal controlled drug oxycodone (pain medication), and Tylenol to resident #1, and gave resident #2 a Delta 9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) edible gummy. Resident #2 was harmed when she had a change in level of consciousness and was transferred to the emergency department.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated.”

    “The AP was responsible for the maltreatment.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect substantiated (individual responsibility).

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. The AP admitted giving resident #1 Tylenol from his personal medications and gave resident #2 Delta 9 THC gummies on two separate occasions. Resident #2's emergency department (ED) toxicology report identified THC and methamphetamine in the resident's system after consuming the Delta 9 THC gummy provided by the AP. An equal opportunity employer.”

    Action taken by facility: “The facility transferred resident #2 to the ED, suspended the AP, reported the incidents to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC), investigated the allegations, and provided education to staff. The AP is no longer employed by the facility.”

    Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”

    Survey completed April 26, 2023: 1 correction order

    • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure two of two residents reviewed, (R1, and R2) were free from maltreatment.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents reviewed, (R1, and R2) were free from maltreatment. R1, and R2 were neglected. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and an individual was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details. No plan of correction is required for this tag.”

      Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

Inconclusive investigations (1)
  • July 8, 2025 · report HL304153122M · MDH finding: Inconclusive
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when the resident's seizure medication was incorrectly discontinued resulting in a seizure and hospitalization.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was inconclusive.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect inconclusive.

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was inconclusive. Although one of the resident's anti-seizure medications was incorrectly discontinued, it could not be determined whether the medication error caused the resident to have a seizure. The resident was prescribed multiple anti-seizure medications and adjustments were made to those medications during the time frame. One month after the medication error, the resident experienced an uncontrolled seizure that required an evaluation at a hospital.”

    Action taken by facility: “When the resident began having seizures, the facility transferred the resident to the hospital. The facility provided education to the nurse, completed audits of medications that were discontinued and changed the procedure when discontinuing medications with the pharmacy.”

    Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”

    Survey completed June 25, 2025: no correction orders issued.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 115 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee NEW PERSPECTIVE WACONIA
License type
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
License number
424645
License status
Active
Current license dated
2026-03-01
Licensed capacity
115
Licensee
NEW PERSPECTIVE WACONIA
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Kate Ryg

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.2 mi, nursing home 0.1 mi, pharmacy 9.0 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Ridgeview Medical Center, Waconia. 0.2 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Auburn Home in Waconia, Waconia. 0.1 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Ridgeview Home Care Services, Waconia. 0.2 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 9.0 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55387 as metropolitan (metropolitan high commuting).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Fresenius Medical Care - Waconia Dialysis, Waconia, 0.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fresenius Kidney Care Chaska, Chaska, 8.1 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Davita Minnetonka Dialysis Unit, Minnetonka, 14.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Hospice
15 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55387.
Ridgeview Hospice, office in Waconia, 0.2 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
St Croix Hospice, office in Hopkins, 18.8 miles away, straight line
Caretenders Hospice, office in Minneapolis, 21.3 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Park Nicollet Clinic, Bloomington. 21.7 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in October 2024. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  3. Your published starting price is a base rate. What would the total monthly cost be for my parent's needs?
  4. How much have prices gone up in each of the last three years?
  5. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  6. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  7. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  8. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  9. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  10. What fees are charged at move-in?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteSee above
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does New Perspective Waconia provide?

New Perspective Waconia is licensed by the state of Minnesota for independent living, assisted living, memory care in Waconia, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 115 residents.

Does Lilisity rate New Perspective Waconia?

No. We publish state licensing details for New Perspective Waconia but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does New Perspective Waconia cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The starting prices it publishes are in the Prices section on this page.

How do I contact New Perspective Waconia?

Use New Perspective Waconia's website, npseniorliving.com/communities/waconia, or visit at 500 Cherry Street, Waconia, MN 55387.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid