Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

New Perspective Golden Valley

4950 Olson Memorial Highway, Golden Valley, MN 55422 · Map
Licensed for 92 residents · SUNRISE OF GOLDEN VALLEY

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

New Perspective Golden Valley is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Golden Valley, Minnesota. It is licensed for 92 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
92 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility dementia care
From $2,200/moStarting price

Prices

Starting prices the community publishes, with the date we checked each one and a link to where it is published. Care charges are usually added after an assessment.

CareStarting atChecked
Assisted Living$2,300 /moOct 12, 2026
Memory Care$2,200 /moOct 12, 2026

Area costs

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Minnesota typically starts at $3,900 to $8,600 a month. Based on 40 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Care and services

From the community’s website

What New Perspective Golden Valley says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.

  • Has a separate memory care unit, wing or neighborhood. Within our memory care neighborhood, residents benefit from a thoughtfully designed setting that encourages familiarity, comfort, and connection. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Offers respite or short-term stays. Respite Care (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Provides transportation. Transportation (page, checked Oct 15, 2026)
  • 3 meals a day. Three meals daily, plus snacks and special events (page, checked Oct 15, 2026)
  • Pets allowed. Pet-friendly community (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Apartment types named: studio, two-bedroom. Floor plan styles (studio, one- and two-bedroom) vary by location. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

1Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Jun 4, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 92 residents

Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 423692, current license dated Nov 1, 2025. Licensee SUNRISE OF GOLDEN VALLEY.

Nearest emergency room

1.7 miles

North Memorial Health Hospital, rated 1 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
New Perspective Golden Valley this community92$2,300/moActive1 substantiated
Honesty Care Home0.6 mi4Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Legacy Care Home0.9 mi6Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Global Pointe Senior Living1.0 mi115Not publishedActive2 substantiated
The Caring Sisters Home Care1.0 mi4Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record1 substantiated
Last evaluation
June 4, 2026
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
1 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
2 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (June 4, 2026, state report 57KS11)

MDH: “On June 1, 2026, through June 4, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a survey at the above provider, and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed June 4, 2026: 6 correction orders

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. The licensee failed to ensure direct care staff were appropriately gloved and performed adequate hand hygiene (HH) for one of four employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed ongoing comprehensive reassessments using the uniform assessment tool at an interval not to exceed 90 days for one of three residents (R4). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, licensee failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed and in compliance with the resident's medication management plan and accepted standards of practice for two of seven residents (R5, R4). [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 510 (144g.41 Subd. 3 - Infection Control Program): $500.00
  • Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $500.00
  • Tag 810 (144g.45 Subd. 2 (b-F) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $500.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $1,500.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • June 26, 2025: report NMB811 · 38 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed September 18, 2025: 19 correction orders

    • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

    • Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

    Show all 19
    • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter E
      Details

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1060: 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      Rule cited: “(a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. [...]”

    • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required (re-issued) Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a cleared Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) background study clearance for one of eight employees (housekeeper (H)-Q).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a cleared Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) background study clearance for one of eight employees (housekeeper (H)-Q). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

    • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

    • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) (3) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care staff must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “{01650} 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation {01650} SS=F and revisions to (f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or categories of staff”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

    • Tag 1650:
      Details

      Rule cited: “who will provide the services; (3) the schedule and methods of monitoring assessments of the resident; (4) the schedule and methods of monitoring staff providing services; and (5) a contingency plan that includes: (i) the action to be taken if the scheduled [...]”

    • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments (re-issued) scope/level letter D
      Details

      Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”

    • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies (re-issued) scope/level letter C
      Details

      Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

    Survey completed June 26, 2025: 19 correction orders

    • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to implement a staffing plan to determine staffing levels to meet the needs of all residents and failed to evaluate that plan at least twice a year potentially affecting all the licensee's current residents, staff, and visitors.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to implement a staffing plan to determine staffing levels to meet the needs of all residents and failed to evaluate that plan at least twice a year potentially affecting all the licensee's current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

    • Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure and contact information for the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) and Office of Ombudsmen for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities (OOMHDD).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure and contact information for the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) and Office of Ombudsmen for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities (OOMHDD). This had the potential to affect residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records included all required content for two of two employees (certified nursing assistant (CNA)-D, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included baseline TB testing for one of two employees (certified nursing assistant (CNA)-D).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included baseline TB testing for one of two employees (certified nursing assistant (CNA)-D). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

    Show all 19
    • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure resident records included a discharge summary for two of two residents (R1, R2) and failed to ensure resident records included documentation of services provided for three of five residents (R3, R4, R5).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure resident records included a discharge summary for two of two residents (R1, R2) and failed to ensure resident records included documentation of services provided for three of five residents (R3, R4, R5). [...]”

      Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment, including walls in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment, including walls in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents. This deficient condition had the potential to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and execute an assisted living written contract with the required content for one of five residents (R5).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and execute an assisted living written contract with the required content for one of five residents (R5). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1060: 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a written notice with the required content for an emergency relocation and failed to notify the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) of the emergency

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a written notice with the required content for an emergency relocation and failed to notify the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) of the emergency relocation lasting more than four (4) days for one of one hospitalized resident (R2). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. [...]”

    • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a cleared Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) background study clearance for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F, ULP-G, ULP-H).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a cleared Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) background study clearance for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F, ULP-G, ULP-H). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

    • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment in the required annual training topics for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment in the required annual training topics for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

    • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) (3) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure two (2) hours of dementia related topics were provided for each twelve (12) months of employment, for one of two employees (certified nursing assistant (CNA)-D).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure two (2) hours of dementia related topics were provided for each twelve (12) months of employment, for one of two employees (certified nursing assistant (CNA)-D). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care staff must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a reassessment no more than 14 days after initiation of services for one of three residents (R2). The licensee also failed to ensure the RN conducted ongoing client reassessments, not to exceed 90 days for two of three residents (R2, R3). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

    • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic [...]”

      Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

    • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management plan with all required content for four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management plan with all required content for four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”

    • Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to document medication administration or the reason why medication administration was not completed as prescribed and document any follow-up procedures that were provided to meet the resident's needs in resident records for one of four residents (R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to document medication administration or the reason why medication administration was not completed as prescribed and document any follow-up procedures that were provided to meet the resident's needs in resident records for one of four residents (R2). [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”

    • Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to document treatment administration for one of four residents (R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to document treatment administration for one of four residents (R2). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”

    • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure policies and procedures for assisted living with dementia care (ALFDC) were provided to residents and the residents' legal and designated representatives at the time of move in for two of two residents residing in the memory care unit (R3, R4).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure policies and procedures for assisted living with dementia care (ALFDC) were provided to residents and the residents' legal and designated representatives at the time of move in for two of two residents residing in the memory care unit (R3, R4). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

    From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

    Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): No orders were issued for this inspection report.

    Fines assessed by MDH

    • Tag 1290 (144g.60 Subdivision 1 - Background Studies Required): $3,000.00

    Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $1,000.00.

    Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

  • February 3, 2025 · report HL239826622M · MDH finding: Substantiated, facility responsibility
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP) neglected the resident when the AP left the resident alone to eat lunch. The resident choked on food and died.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated.”

    “The facility was responsible for the maltreatment.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect substantiated (facility responsibility).

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The facility was responsible for the maltreatment. The resident had requested a change from thickened liquids to regular consistency liquids due to quality of life but maintained difficulties swallowing due a medical condition. The facility nursing assessment indicated he needed supervision and cues during meals for meal safety. The facility failed to implement the required meal supervision service and directives to unlicensed personnel (ULP) for cues during meals. ULP interviewed stated he ate independently. The AP was not responsible for maltreatment. The AP followed the plan of care provided by the facility.”

    Action taken by facility: “The facility called 911 and the family.”

    Action taken by MDH: “The responsible party will be notified of their right to appeal the maltreatment finding. The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”

    Survey completed December 3, 2024: 2 correction orders

    • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to implement services required by the service plan for one of one residents (R1) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to implement services required by the service plan for one of one residents (R1) with records reviewed. R1 required reminders and supervision with eating. R1 ate a meal alone in his room, choked and died. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

    • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one resident reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one resident reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and the facility was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”

      Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

Unsubstantiated investigations (2)
  • April 17, 2026 · report HL239828062M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP) abused the resident when the AP tied the resident's wheelchair to another dining chair restraining the resident from moving about the unit.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was not substantiated.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: abuse not substantiated.

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was not substantiated. Although the incident occurred, the incident did not meet the definition of abuse. No physical restraint was utilized on the resident, there was no evidence of harm to the resident and the resident was not aware the incident occurred.”

    Action taken by facility: “The AP and other staff members were suspended and terminated. The facility provided refresher training to all staff regarding resident rights.”

    Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”

    Survey completed January 12, 2026: no correction orders issued.

  • January 2, 2024 · report HL239827484M
    Details

    Survey completed November 30, 2023: no correction orders issued.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 92 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee SUNRISE OF GOLDEN VALLEY
License type
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
License number
423692
License status
Active
Current license dated
2025-11-01
Licensed capacity
92
Licensee
SUNRISE OF GOLDEN VALLEY
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Beth Landers

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.7 mi, nursing home 1.1 mi, pharmacy 2.3 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
North Memorial Health Hospital, Robbinsdale. 1.7 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 1 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Covenant Living of Golden Valley Care & Rehab CTR, Golden Valley. 1.1 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Lifespark Home Health, Saint Louis Park. 1.6 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 2.3 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55422 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Fmc Dialysis - Golden Valley, Golden Valley, 1.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Robbinsdale Dialysis, Robbinsdale, 2.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fkc - Robbinsdale Dialysis, Robbinsdale, 3.1 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Hospice
28 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55422.
Moments Hospice, office in Golden Valley, 0.5 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars)
Lifesprk Hospice LLC, office in Saint Louis Park, 1.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 2 of 5 stars)
Grace Hospice, office in Minneapolis, 2.4 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Twin Cities Physicians Professional Corporation, Golden Valley. 0.8 miles away, straight line. 3 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk very low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: very low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively low, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in February 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  3. Your published starting price is a base rate. What would the total monthly cost be for my parent's needs?
  4. How much have prices gone up in each of the last three years?
  5. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  6. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  7. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  8. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  9. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  10. What fees are charged at move-in?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteSee above
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does New Perspective Golden Valley provide?

New Perspective Golden Valley is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Golden Valley, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 92 residents.

Does Lilisity rate New Perspective Golden Valley?

No. We publish state licensing details for New Perspective Golden Valley but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does New Perspective Golden Valley cost?

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The starting prices it publishes are in the Prices section on this page.

How do I contact New Perspective Golden Valley?

Use New Perspective Golden Valley's website, npseniorliving.com/communities/golden-valley, or visit at 4950 Olson Memorial Highway, Golden Valley, MN 55422.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid