Independent Living and Assisted Living and Memory Care
New Perspective Eagan
3810 Alder Lane, Eagan, MN 55122 · Map
Licensed for 155 residents · NEW PERSPECTIVE EAGAN
New Perspective Eagan is a state-licensed independent living, assisted living, memory care community in Eagan, Minnesota. It is licensed for 155 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
Starting prices the community publishes, with the date we checked each one and a link to where it is published. Care charges are usually added after an assessment.
| Care | Starting at | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| Assisted Living | $1,735 /mo | Oct 12, 2026 |
| Memory Care | $1,370 /mo | Oct 12, 2026 |
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What New Perspective Eagan says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
- Has a separate memory care unit, wing or neighborhood.
Designed for those experiencing dementia or other memory impairments, our licensed and secured memory care neighborhood offers specially trained employees, intentional programming, unique community features, and more.
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026) - Offers respite or short-term stays.
Respite Care
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026) - 3 meals a day.
Three Daily Meals
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026) - Pets allowed.
Pet-friendly community
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026) - Apartment types named: studio, two-bedroom.
Floor plan styles (studio, one- and two-bedroom) vary by location.
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 155 residents
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 424875, current license dated Mar 1, 2026. Licensee NEW PERSPECTIVE EAGAN.
Nearest emergency room
5.8 miles
M Health Fairview Ridges Hospital, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Perspective Eagan this community | 155 | $1,735/mo | Active | 1 substantiated | |
| Prime Living MN | 0.5 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Eagancare Behavioral Health | 0.7 mi | 4 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated |
| Prime Care Homes | 0.8 mi | 4 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Aalluring Residential Care | 0.9 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
State inspection record1 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- August 5, 2026
- Evaluations on record
- 2
- Investigations substantiated
- 1 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 1 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 1 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (August 5, 2026, state report QHHX11)
MDH: “On August 3, 2026, through August 5, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a change of ownership (CHOW) survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”
Survey completed August 5, 2026: 8 correction orders
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”
- Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7)days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”
- Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”
Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”
- Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure competency training and evaluations were completed for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-E, ULP-F) prior to providing direct care.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure competency training and evaluations were completed for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-E, ULP-F) prior to providing direct care. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”
- Tag 1820: 144G.71 Subd. 13 Prescriptions Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have physician's orders which included all the required content for four of four residents (R4, R7, R6, R2) receiving diclofenac (topical pain relief gel).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have physician's orders which included all the required content for four of four residents (R4, R7, R6, R2) receiving diclofenac (topical pain relief gel). [...]”
Rule cited: “There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident.”
Show all 8
- Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure time sensitive medications were labeled with open and/or expiration dates in two of three medication carts (MC1, MC2)
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure time sensitive medications were labeled with open and/or expiration dates in two of three medication carts (MC1, MC2) This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death) and was issued at a pattern scope (when more than a [...]”
Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”
- Tag 1900: 144G.71 Subd. 21 Prohibitions Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a prescription for insulin pen needles for one resident was not being used for
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure a prescription for insulin pen needles for one resident was not being used for another resident with insulin administration. [...]”
Rule cited: “No prescription drug supply for one resident may be used or saved for use by anyone other than the resident.”
- Tag 2320: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (b) Appropriate care and services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-D, ULP-F) administered medications according to policy and accepted standards of practice during insulin and inhaler administration.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-D, ULP-F) administered medications according to policy and accepted standards of practice during insulin and inhaler administration. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Residents have the right to receive health care and other assisted living services with continuity from people who are properly trained and competent to perform their duties and in sufficient numbers to adequately provide the services agreed to in the [...]”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.
Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.
Earlier evaluations (1)
- June 22, 2023: report X0IN11 · 3 correction orders
Details
Survey completed June 22, 2023: 3 correction orders
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”
- Tag 970: 144G.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure the contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents living at the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”
- Tag 980: 144G.51 ARBITRATION Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract's arbitration provision did not preclude, limit, or delay the ability of a resident from taking civil action.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract's arbitration provision did not preclude, limit, or delay the ability of a resident from taking civil action. The licensee further failed to ensure the contract did not include a choice of venue provision. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents living at the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility must clearly and conspicuously disclose, in writing in an assisted living contract, any arbitration provision in the contract that precludes, limits, or delays the ability of a resident from taking a civil action. [...]”
From MDH’s letter: no immediate fines.
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Substantiated investigations (state reports)
- April 4, 2024 · report HL235051140M · MDH finding: Substantiated, facility responsibility
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when staff failed to check on the resident or enter his apartment for multiple days. The resident was found on the floor and taken to the hospital.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated.”
“The facility was responsible for the maltreatment.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect substantiated (facility responsibility).
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The facility was responsible for the maltreatment. The facility failed to ensure staff were directed on the residents individualized plan of care. Staff failed to check on the resident or enter his apartment for three days. The resident was found lying on the floor in his apartment. The resident was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with traumatic rhabdomyolysis (a serious condition resulting from the death of muscle fibers releasing their contents into the blood stream after a traumatic event), closed head injury, facial skin infection, right arm weakness, head and right elbow wounds, and multiple scrapes. [...]”
Action taken by facility: “Facility conducted an internal investigation, conducted service education with care staff, and coached staff that had erroneously documented completing services.”
Action taken by MDH: “The responsible party will be notified of their right to appeal the maltreatment finding. The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”
Survey completed March 6, 2024: 1 correction order
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.
MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and the facility was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”
Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
Inconclusive investigations (1)
- December 4, 2023 · report HL235056344M · MDH finding: Inconclusive
Details
Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP) neglected a resident when the AP failed to place foot pedals on the resident's wheelchair before pushing the resident's wheelchair. The resident sustained a neck fracture when his foot caught under the wheelchair, and he fell.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was inconclusive.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect inconclusive.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was inconclusive. There was inconsistent information as to if the resident's foot pedals were in place on the wheelchair at the time of the incident.”
Action taken by facility: “Care staff re-educated regarding the use of foot pedals when assisting residents in wheelchairs.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed October 30, 2023: no correction orders issued.
Unsubstantiated investigations (1)
- February 11, 2025 · report HL235056706M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when the facility failed to follow multiple aspects of the resident's plan of care, including eating assistance, which resulted in the resident losing a significant amount of weight.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The resident's meal intake was not consistently tracked and the amount of eating assistance provided to the resident varied between staff. However, there was no indication the resident lost weight due to neglect. Additional concerns including lack of staff assistance with showering, grooming, dressing, and apartment cleaning were reviewed. Corresponding licensing orders were issued regarding the facility's non-compliance.”
Action taken by facility: “Review of care concerns, education of care staff.”
Action taken by MDH: “The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”
Survey completed December 18, 2024: 3 correction orders
- Tag 450: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Fourteen (14) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure utilization of person-centered planning and service delivery process for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure utilization of person-centered planning and service delivery process for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “All assisted living facilities shall: (1) distribute to residents the assisted living bill of rights; (2) provide services in a manner that complies with the Nurse Practice Act in sections 148.171 to 148.285; (3) utilize a person-centered planning and service [...]”
- Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain an infection control program which complied with accepted health care standards, when the licensee failed to implement their policy for cleaning and disinfecting apartments.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and document review, the licensee failed to maintain an infection control program which complied with accepted health care standards, when the licensee failed to implement their policy for cleaning and disinfecting apartments. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”
- Tag 2350: 144G.91 Subd. 7 Courteous treatment Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R1), was treated with dignity and respect when receiving services.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R1), was treated with dignity and respect when receiving services. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or [...]”
Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be treated with courtesy and respect, and to have the resident's property treated with respect”
- Tag 450: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Fourteen (14) days
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 155 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee NEW PERSPECTIVE EAGAN
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
- License number
- 424875
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2026-03-01
- Licensed capacity
- 155
- Licensee
- NEW PERSPECTIVE EAGAN
- County
- Dakota County
- Administrator/Authorized Agent
- Kate Ryg
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 5.8 mi, nursing home 2.5 mi, pharmacy 1.5 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- M Health Fairview Ridges Hospital, Burnsville. 5.8 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Martin Luther Care Center, Bloomington. 2.5 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Alliance Health Services Inc, Eagan. 2.2 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- CVS Pharmacy. 1.5 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55122 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Davita Bloomington Dialysis Unit Of Trc, Bloomington, 4.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Davita East Valley Dialysis, Apple Valley, 5.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Davita Burnsville Dialysis Unit, Burnsville, 5.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 27 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55122.
Healthpartners Hospice And Palliatice Care, office in Bloomington, 2.7 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Sholom Hospice, office in Saint Paul, 7.7 miles away, straight line
Caretenders Hospice, office in Minneapolis, 8.2 miles away, straight line - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Fairview Clinics, Eagan. 1.9 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively low, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- Your published starting price is a base rate. What would the total monthly cost be for my parent's needs?
- How much have prices gone up in each of the last three years?
- How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
- What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
- How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does New Perspective Eagan provide?
New Perspective Eagan is licensed by the state of Minnesota for independent living, assisted living, memory care in Eagan, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 155 residents.
Does Lilisity rate New Perspective Eagan?
No. We publish state licensing details for New Perspective Eagan but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does New Perspective Eagan cost?
Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The starting prices it publishes are in the Prices section on this page.
How do I contact New Perspective Eagan?
Use New Perspective Eagan's website, npseniorliving.com/communities/eagan, or visit at 3810 Alder Lane, Eagan, MN 55122.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid