Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

Motivate Home Services (Assisted Living and Memory Care)

6940 Zane Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, MN 55429 · Map
Licensed for 26 residents · MOTIVATE HOME SERVICES LLC

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Motivate Home Services (Assisted Living and Memory Care) is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. It is licensed for 26 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
26 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility dementia care
$2,500 to $4,400/moTypical assisted living start in Hennepin County, from 18 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Minnesota typically starts at $3,900 to $8,600 a month. Based on 40 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

1Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Sep 22, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 26 residents

Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 422723, current license dated Nov 14, 2025. Licensee MOTIVATE HOME SERVICES LLC.

Nearest emergency room

5.0 miles

North Memorial Health Hospital, rated 1 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Motivate Home Services (Assisted Living and Memory Care) this community26Not publishedActive1 substantiated
New Horizon Assisted Living0.1 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Vaimar Suites, 68th Avenue North0.2 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Maranatha0.3 mi68Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Berkeley Heights Home of Minne0.4 mi5Not publishedActive1 substantiated
State inspection record1 substantiated
Last evaluation
September 22, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
1 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
2 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (September 22, 2025, state report W33C11)

MDH: “On November 4, 2025, through November 6, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed November 6, 2025: 1 correction order

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with Minnesota State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules chapter 7511.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with Minnesota State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules chapter 7511. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): No orders were issued for this inspection report.

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd.2. (a) - Fire Protection And PhysicalEnvironment): $500.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • November 8, 2023: report 0V3U11 · 16 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed November 10, 2023: 16 correction orders

    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained documentation of training and competency evaluations to include authentication of the trainer who has delegated tasks to unlicensed personnel (ULP) congruent with requirements of 144G.62, Subdivisions 2 through 4., for two of two employees (ULP-B, ULP-E).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained documentation of training and competency evaluations to include authentication of the trainer who has delegated tasks to unlicensed personnel (ULP) congruent with requirements of 144G.62, Subdivisions 2 through 4., for two of two employees (ULP-B, ULP-E). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included baseline testing and screening for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-E). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

    • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review the licensee failed to maintain a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all residents under the assisted living license. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

    • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to complete a discharge summary for one of one discharged resident (R1).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to complete a discharge summary for one of one discharged resident (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents). [...]”

      Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a fire safety and evacuation plan with the required elements, failed to provide required employee and resident training on fire safety and evacuation, and failed to conduct required evacuation drills.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on a record review and interview, the licensee failed to develop a fire safety and evacuation plan with the required elements, failed to provide required employee and resident training on fire safety and evacuation, and failed to conduct required evacuation drills. This had the potential to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    Show all 16
    • Tag 910: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (a-b) Contract information Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for all the licensee's residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for all the licensee's residents. This practice resulted in a level one violation (a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The contract must include in a conspicuous place and manner on the contract the legal name and the health facility identification of the facility. [...]”

    • Tag 950: 144G.50 Subd. 3 Designation of representative Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to include the required statutory language on a document separate from the contract for all the licensee's residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Before or at the time of execution of an assisted living contract, an assisted living facility must offer the resident the opportunity to identify a designated representative in writing in the contract and must provide the following verbatim notice on a [...]”

    • Tag 970: 144G.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the licensee's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident for all licensee's residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the licensee's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident for all licensee's residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure direct-care staff completed at least eight hours of initial dementia care training within 80 working hours of the employment start date for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-E).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure direct-care staff completed at least eight hours of initial dementia care training within 80 working hours of the employment start date for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-E). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care employees must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

    • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the current service plan included a signature or other authentication by the resident and the facility to document agreement on the services to be provided for two of two residents (R2, R3).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the current service plan included a signature or other authentication by the resident and the facility to document agreement on the services to be provided for two of two residents (R2, R3). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

    • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individual medication management plan (IMMP) to include all required content for two of two residents (R2, R3).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individual medication management plan (IMMP) to include all required content for two of two residents (R2, R3). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1820: 144G.71 Subd. 13 Prescriptions Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7)
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of one resident (R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of one resident (R2). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large [...]”

      Rule cited: “There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident.”

    • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide documentation in the resident's record regarding the disposition of medication to include all the required content for one of one discharged resident (R1).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide documentation in the resident's record regarding the disposition of medication to include all the required content for one of one discharged resident (R1). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

    • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure policies and procedures for assisted living with dementia care (ALFDC) were provided to residents or the resident's legal and /or designated representative at the time of move-in for two of two residents (R2, R3). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

    • Tag 2140: 144G.83 Subd. 3 Supervising staff training Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the designated person to oversee staff training in the care of individuals with dementia completed the required competency test.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the designated person to oversee staff training in the care of individuals with dementia completed the required competency test. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Persons providing or overseeing staff training must have experience and knowledge in the care of individuals with dementia, including: (1) two years of work experience related to Alzheimer's disease or other dementias, or in health care, gerontology, or [...]”

    • Tag 2170: 144G.84 SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to conduct an evaluation for

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to conduct an evaluation for activities that addressed all provisions and failed to develop an individualized activity plan based on the evaluation, for one of one resident (R4). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each resident must be evaluated for activities according to the licensing rules of the facility. [...]”

    From MDH’s letter: MDH granted the assisted living license; no immediate fines.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

  • February 28, 2024 · report HL388648972C
    Details

    Survey completed January 25, 2024: 2 correction orders

    • Tag 860: 144G.45 Subd. 6 New construction; plans Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) Days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to submit plans for review and approval with a planned remodel of the facility water system.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review, the licensee failed to submit plans for review and approval with a planned remodel of the facility water system. The licensee notified residents of the need for relocation due to the need of maintenance and remodel of the facility water system but no plans were submitted to the state department for approval and/or review. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For all new licensure and construction beginning on or after August 1, 2021, the following must be provided to the commissioner: (1) architectural and engineering plans and specifications for new construction must be prepared and signed by architects and [...]”

    • Tag 1130: 144G.55 Subd. 2 Safe location Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, record review and interview, licensee failed to ensure transfer of residents to an adequate and safe location when three of three residents (R1, R2, and R3) were transferred to the hospital due to the licensee's inability to coordinate transfer of the residents to an appropriate provider. [...]”

      Rule cited: “A safe location is not a private home where the occupant is unwilling or unable to care for the resident, a homeless shelter, a hotel, or a motel. [...]”

Unsubstantiated investigations (2)
  • December 29, 2023 · report HL388648438C
    Details

    Survey completed December 29, 2023: no correction orders issued.

  • November 6, 2023 · report HL388646650C
    Details

    Survey completed October 30, 2023: no correction orders issued.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 26 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee MOTIVATE HOME SERVICES LLC
License type
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
License number
422723
License status
Active
Current license dated
2025-11-14
Licensed capacity
26
Licensee
MOTIVATE HOME SERVICES LLC
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Rachel Lorenzen

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 5.0 mi, nursing home 0.3 mi, pharmacy 1.0 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
North Memorial Health Hospital, Robbinsdale. 5.0 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 1 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Maranatha Care Center, Brooklyn Center. 0.3 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Centerwell Home Health, Brooklyn Park. 1.7 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 1.0 mile away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55429 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita New Hope Dialysis Center, New Hope, 1.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fresenius Kidney Care Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Center, 2.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fkc - Robbinsdale Dialysis, Robbinsdale, 3.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Hospice
22 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55429.
North Memorial Home Hlth Hospc, office in Robbinsdale, 4.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Moments Hospice, office in Golden Valley, 6.4 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars)
Superior Hospice Inc., office in Golden Valley, 6.7 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Hennepin Healthcare System Inc, Brooklyn Park. 0.8 miles away, straight line. 2 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  4. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  5. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  6. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  7. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  8. What fees are charged at move-in?
  9. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  10. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Motivate Home Services (Assisted Living and Memory Care) provide?

Motivate Home Services (Assisted Living and Memory Care) is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 26 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Motivate Home Services (Assisted Living and Memory Care)?

No. We publish state licensing details for Motivate Home Services (Assisted Living and Memory Care) but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Motivate Home Services (Assisted Living and Memory Care) cost?

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Motivate Home Services (Assisted Living and Memory Care) does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Motivate Home Services (Assisted Living and Memory Care)?

Visit Motivate Home Services (Assisted Living and Memory Care) at 6940 Zane Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, MN 55429.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid