Lilisity

Assisted Living

Minn Care Home Health, Fremont Avenue North

7215 Fremont Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 · Map
Licensed for 5 residents · MINN CARE HOME HEALTH

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Minn Care Home Health, Fremont Avenue North is a state-licensed assisted living community in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. It is licensed for 5 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
5 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,500 to $4,400/moTypical assisted living start in Hennepin County, from 18 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Jul 31, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 5 residents

Assisted Living Facility 422376, current license dated Oct 1, 2025. Licensee MINN CARE HOME HEALTH.

Nearest emergency room

5.7 miles

North Memorial Health Hospital, rated 1 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Minn Care Home Health, Fremont Avenue North this community5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Miles Vents0.0 mi4Not publishedActive0 substantiated
New Horizon Assisted Living0.1 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Merchant Health Services0.2 mi5Not publishedActiveNo record
Unity Trust Home Care0.2 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
July 31, 2026
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (July 31, 2026, state report EP9111)

MDH: “On July 27, 2026, through July 31, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed July 31, 2026: 17 correction orders

  • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement a written staffing plan that included an evaluation completed by a registered nurse (RN) (as indicated in Minnesota Administrative Rule 4659.0180) at least twice a year.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement a written staffing plan that included an evaluation completed by a registered nurse (RN) (as indicated in Minnesota Administrative Rule 4659.0180) at least twice a year. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 485: 144G.41 Subdivision 1.a (a) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to inform residents in advance of changes to the menu and failed to provide residents with a balanced meal that included fresh fruit and vegetables.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to inform residents in advance of changes to the menu and failed to provide residents with a balanced meal that included fresh fruit and vegetables. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must offer to provide or make available at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) [...]”

  • Tag 495: 144G.41 Subdivision. 1 (13) Minimum Requirements Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was available 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all residents and staff. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(13) provide staff access to an on-call registered nurse 24 hours per day, seven days per week.”

  • Tag 500: 144G.41 Subd. 2 Policies and procedures Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement current policies and procedures as required.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement current policies and procedures as required. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must have policies and procedures in place to address the following and keep them current: (1) requirements in section 626.557, reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults; (2) conducting and handling background studies on [...]”

Show all 17
  • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for one of three residents (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for one of three residents (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content. Additionally, the licensee failed to post the EPP prominently. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving services under the assisted living license. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 700: 144G.43 Subdivision 1 Resident record Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure resident's personal health and medical information was kept private.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure resident's personal health and medical information was kept private. This had the potential to affect all residents residing within the facility. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Resident records, whether written or electronic, must be protected against loss, tampering, or unauthorized disclosure in compliance with chapter 13 and other applicable relevant federal and state laws. [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received at least eight (8) hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment for one of three employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS) -C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

  • Tag 1530: 144G.64 (a) (1-2) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to complete two hours of initial training on mental illness and de-escalation for employees hired prior to July 1, 2025, for three of three employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS) -C, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D, ULP-F).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to complete two hours of initial training on mental illness and de-escalation for employees hired prior to July 1, 2025, for three of three employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS) -C, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D, ULP-F). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following dementia care, mental illness, and de-escalation training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on dementia topics specified under [...]”

  • Tag 1610: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (a-b) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to a conduct a nursing assessment by a registered nurse (RN) of the physical and cognitive needs for one of two residents (R1) on or before the admission date.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to a conduct a nursing assessment by a registered nurse (RN) of the physical and cognitive needs for one of two residents (R1) on or before the admission date. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the RN conducted ongoing resident assessment and reassessment, not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last date of the assessment for two of two residents (R1, R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the RN conducted ongoing resident assessment and reassessment, not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last date of the assessment for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management record with the required content for two of two residents (R1 and R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management record with the required content for two of two residents (R1 and R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”

  • Tag 1820: 144G.71 Subd. 13 Prescriptions Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure written or

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident.”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure time sensitive medications were labeled with the date opened for one of two residents (R1).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure time sensitive medications were labeled with the date opened for one of two residents (R1). [...]”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

  • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care, and medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident (R1) with bed rails.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care, and medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident (R1) with bed rails. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 495 (144g.41 Subdivision. 1 (13) - Minimum Requirements): $1,000.00
  • Tag 810 (144g.45 Subd. 2 (b-F) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $1,000.00
  • Tag 2310 (144g.91 Subd. 4 (a) - Appropriate Care And Services): $1,000.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • August 2, 2024: report I2I611 · 17 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed August 2, 2024: 17 correction orders

    • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement a written staffing plan that included an evaluation completed by a registered nurse (RN) at least twice a year (as indicated in Minnesota Administrative Rule 4659.0180) at least twice a year.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement a written staffing plan that included an evaluation completed by a registered nurse (RN) at least twice a year (as indicated in Minnesota Administrative Rule 4659.0180) at least twice a year. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

    • Tag 500: 144G.41 Subd. 2 Policies and procedures Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement current policies and procedures as required.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement current policies and procedures as required. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must have policies and procedures in place to address the following and keep them current: (1) requirements in section 626.557, reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults; (2) conducting and handling background studies on [...]”

    • Tag 570: 144G.42 Subdivision 1 Display of license Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to display the original current license at the main entrance as required.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to display the original current license at the main entrance as required. This practice resulted in a level one violation (a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

      Rule cited: “The original current license must be displayed at the main entrance of each assisted living facility. The facility must provide a copy of the license to any person who requests it.”

    • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

    Show all 17
    • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain a written emergency

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a written emergency preparedness (EP) plan with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

    • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms that functioned and are interconnected so that the actuation of one alarm causes all alarms in the dwelling unit to actuate.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms that functioned and are interconnected so that the actuation of one alarm causes all alarms in the dwelling unit to actuate. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff and residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training and drills.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training and drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 1610: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (a-b) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to a conduct a nursing assessment by a registered nurse (RN) of the physical and cognitive needs for one of two residents (R1) on or before the admission date.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to a conduct a nursing assessment by a registered nurse (RN) of the physical and cognitive needs for one of two residents (R1) on or before the admission date. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted a reassessment, not to exceed 14 calendar days from the initiation of services, for two of two residents (R1, R2) and failed to ensure the RN conducted ongoing resident assessment and reassessment, not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last date of the assessment for two of two residents (R1, R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted a reassessment, not to exceed 14 calendar days from the initiation of services, for two of two residents (R1, R2) and failed to ensure the RN conducted ongoing resident assessment and reassessment, not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last date of the assessment for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

    • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to complete a service plan within 14 days of admission for one of two residents

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to complete a service plan within 14 days of admission for one of two residents (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

    • Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a re-assessment when there was change in the resident's medications to evaluate potential side effects or drug interactions for a resident's non-prescribed drug use. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”

    • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for two of two residents (R1, R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain a current individualized medication management record for each resident to include all required content for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access. [...]”

      Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

    • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information. [...]”

      Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

    • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide documentation in the resident's record regarding the disposition of medication to include medication's name, strength, prescription number as applicable, quantity, to whom the medications were given, date of disposition, and names of staff and other individuals involved in the disposition for three of three discharged residents (R3, R4, R5).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide documentation in the resident's record regarding the disposition of medication to include medication's name, strength, prescription number as applicable, quantity, to whom the medications were given, date of disposition, and names of staff and other individuals involved in the disposition for three of three discharged residents (R3, R4, R5). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

    From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee MINN CARE HOME HEALTH
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
422376
License status
Active
Current license dated
2025-10-01
Licensed capacity
5
Licensee
MINN CARE HOME HEALTH
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Ikenna Dijeh

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 5.7 mi, nursing home 1.4 mi, pharmacy 1.8 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
North Memorial Health Hospital, Robbinsdale. 5.7 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 1 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
The Estates at Fridley LLC, Fridley. 1.4 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Elizjoseph Healthcare LLC, Brooklyn Center. 1.1 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 1.8 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55430 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Fresenius Kidney Care Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Center, 1.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita East River Road Dialysis, Fridley, 1.6 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Fmc Dialysis - North Suburban, Coon Rapids, 3.8 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
20 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55430.
North Memorial Home Hlth Hospc, office in Robbinsdale, 4.9 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Moments Hospice, office in Golden Valley, 7.2 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars)
Grace Hospice, office in Minneapolis, 7.2 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Hennepin Healthcare System Inc, Brooklyn Park. 2.9 miles away, straight line. 2 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Minn Care Home Health, Fremont Avenue North provide?

Minn Care Home Health, Fremont Avenue North is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 5 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Minn Care Home Health, Fremont Avenue North?

No. We publish state licensing details for Minn Care Home Health, Fremont Avenue North but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Minn Care Home Health, Fremont Avenue North cost?

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Minn Care Home Health, Fremont Avenue North does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Minn Care Home Health, Fremont Avenue North?

Visit Minn Care Home Health, Fremont Avenue North at 7215 Fremont Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid