Marvella

Last evaluation

November 20, 2025

Evaluations on record

2

Investigations substantiated

1 kept 7 years

Inconclusive

0 kept 4 years

Unsubstantiated

0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (November 20, 2025, state report ZLQ211)

MDH: “On November 17, 2025, through November 20, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed November 20, 2025: 5 correction orders

• Tag 130: 144G.12, Subd. 1 Application for Licensure Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to meet the requirements of licensure by exceeding licensed resident capacity.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to meet the requirements of licensure by exceeding licensed resident capacity. This had the potential to affect all residents of the assisted living facility. [...]”

  Rule cited: “Each application for an assisted living facility license, including provisional and renewal applications, must include information sufficient to show that the applicant meets the requirements of licensure, including: (1) the business name and legal entity [...]”

• Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program that complied with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program that complied with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control. The deficient practice had the potential to affect residents, employees, and visitors. [...]”

  Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

• Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

  Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

• Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 1, isolated scope, scope/level letter A · correction period: Seven (7) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

  Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

• Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing resident monitoring and reassessment, not to exceed 14 calendar days from the start of services and ongoing assessment not to exceed every 90 days for one of two residents (R1). [...]”

  Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): No orders were issued for this inspection report.

Fines assessed by MDH

• Tag 510 (144g.41 Subd. 3 - Infection Control Program): $500.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

• February 28, 2025 · report HL394446742M · MDH finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility
  Details

  Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP), a facility staff member financially exploited resident #1 and resident #2. The AP used resident #1's credit card and made unapproved charges and took resident #1's wedding ring. Resident #2 was financially exploited when the AP took $40.00 from the resident.”

  “The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated.”

  “The AP was responsible for the maltreatment.”

  Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: financial exploitation substantiated (individual responsibility).

  MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined financial exploitation was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. During the course of the investigation, it was discovered resident #1 and resident #4 had charges made on their credit card that totaled almost $5,000.00 from vendors used by the AP including apartment rent. Although resident #1 lost a wedding ring and cash, and resident #2, resident #3, resident #4 had cash taken from them, it could not be determined if the AP took the wedding ring and cash because of the uncertain time frame of the incidents, no witnesses, and the number of people that had access to the resident's apartments.”

  Action taken by facility: “The facility completed an internal investigation, notified the police and suspended the AP. The AP is no longer employed by the facility.”

  Action taken by MDH: “The facility was issued a correction order regarding the vulnerable adult's right to be free from maltreatment.”

  Survey completed January 27, 2025: 1 correction order

  • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure two of four residents reviewed (R1 and R4) was free from maltreatment.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure two of four residents reviewed (R1 and R4) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and an individual person was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”

    Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 88 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.