Lilisity

Assisted Living

Loving Care Cottage

7740 Hadley Avenue South, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 · Map
Licensed for 6 residents · LOVING CARE COTTAGE LLC

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Loving Care Cottage is a state-licensed assisted living community in Cottage Grove, Minnesota. It is licensed for 6 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
6 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Dec 19, 2024. See the record

License

Active, 6 residents

Assisted Living Facility 421799, current license dated Aug 1, 2025. Licensee LOVING CARE COTTAGE LLC.

Nearest emergency room

5.7 miles

M Health Fairview Woodwinds Hospital, rated 4 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Loving Care Cottage this community6Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Shekky Care Services Professio0.1 mi5Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Cottage Grove Wp0.2 mi44Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Cottage Grove Wp II0.4 mi44Not publishedActive2 substantiated
Peace Healthcare Systems0.5 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
December 19, 2024
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (December 19, 2024, state report SZHR11)

MDH: “On May 5, 2025, to May 6, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a revisit at the above provider to follow-up on orders issued pursuant to a survey completed on December 19, 2024.”

Survey completed May 6, 2025: 14 correction orders

  • Tag 115: 144G.10 Subd. 2 Licensure categories (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to obtain an assisted living facility with dementia care license when the licensee provided dementia care services, and utilized a lock to secure the facility so residents could not exit the locked door without entering a code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to obtain an assisted living facility with dementia care license when the licensee provided dementia care services, and utilized a lock to secure the facility so residents could not exit the locked door without entering a code. This had the potential to affect all five residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The categories in this subdivision are established for assisted living facility licensure. (1) The assisted living facility category is for assisted living facilities that only provide assisted living services. [...]”

  • Tag 340: 144G.30 Subd. 5 Correction orders (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide sufficient documentation with actions taken to comply with the correction orders from a survey completed December 19, 2024.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide sufficient documentation with actions taken to comply with the correction orders from a survey completed December 19, 2024. The lack of action to ensure compliance with regulations had the potential to affect all residents receiving services from the licensee. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) A correction order may be issued whenever the commissioner finds upon survey or during a complaint investigation that a facility, a managerial official, an agent of the facility, or staff of the facility is not in compliance with this chapter. [...]”

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma (re-issued) Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for two of two residents (R2, R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for two of two residents (R2, R5). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records (re-issued) Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, for two of two employees (licensed assisted living director/clinical nurse supervisor (LALD/CNS)-A, volunteer (V)-F).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, for two of two employees (licensed assisted living director/clinical nurse supervisor (LALD/CNS)-A, volunteer (V)-F). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

Show all 14
  • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included a TB history and symptom screening, TB baseline testing and TB transmission training for one (volunteer (V)-F).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included a TB history and symptom screening, TB baseline testing and TB transmission training for one (volunteer (V)-F). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident record included documentation that services were provided as identified in the service plan for two of two residents (R2, R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident record included documentation that services were provided as identified in the service plan for two of two residents (R2, R5). [...]”

    Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) provide smoke alarms outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of bedrooms; (iii) provide smoke [...]”

  • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2-3) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED (re-issued) Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required amount of dementia care training was completed in the required time frame in accordance with 144G.64 for two of two employees, (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the required amount of dementia care training was completed in the required time frame in accordance with 144G.64 for two of two employees, (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

  • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident service plan included the required content for three of three residents (R2, R3, R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident service plan included the required content for three of three residents (R2, R3, R5). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large [...]”

    Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan (re-issued) Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management plan with the required content for two of two residents (R2, R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management plan with the required content for two of two residents (R2, R5). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

Survey completed March 11, 2025: 27 correction orders

  • Tag 115: 144G.10 Subd. 2 Licensure categories (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) The categories in this subdivision are established for assisted living facility licensure. (1) The assisted living facility category is for assisted living facilities that only provide assisted living services. [...]”

  • Tag 340: 144G.30 Subd. 5 Correction orders (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) A correction order may be issued whenever the commissioner finds upon survey or during a complaint investigation that a facility, a managerial official, an agent of the facility, or staff of the facility is not in compliance with this chapter. [...]”

  • Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”

  • Tag 460: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(5) provide a means for residents to request assistance for health and safety needs 24 hours per day, seven days per week; (6) allow residents the ability to furnish and decorate the resident's unit within the terms of the assisted living contract; (7) permit [...]”

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

Show all 27
  • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program (re-issued) scope/level letter F · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

  • Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

  • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records (re-issued) scope/level letter E
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) provide smoke alarms outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of bedrooms; (iii) provide smoke [...]”

  • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2-3) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (a) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”

  • Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”

  • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

  • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

  • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to (re-issued) scope/level letter E
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

  • Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

  • Tag 1770: 144G.71 Subd. 9 Documentation of medication setup (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “Documentation of dates of medication setup, name of medication, quantity of dose, times to be administered, route of administration, and name of person completing medication setup must be done at the time of setup.”

  • Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

  • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care standards, medical or nursing standards for three of three residents (R2, R4, R5) who utilized hospital style bed rails.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care standards, medical or nursing standards for three of three residents (R2, R4, R5) who utilized hospital style bed rails. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

Survey completed December 19, 2024: 28 correction orders

  • Tag 115: 144G.10 Subd. 2 Licensure categories Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to obtain an assisted living facility with dementia care license when the licensee provided dementia care services, and utilized a lock to secure the facility so residents could not exit the locked door without entering a code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to obtain an assisted living facility with dementia care license when the licensee provided dementia care services, and utilized a lock to secure the facility so residents could not exit the locked door without entering a code. This had the potential to affect all five residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The categories in this subdivision are established for assisted living facility licensure. (1) The assisted living facility category is for assisted living facilities that only provide assisted living services. [...]”

  • Tag 340: 144G.30 Subd. 5 Correction orders Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to record actions taken to comply with all correction orders from a survey completed March 17, 2022.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to record actions taken to comply with all correction orders from a survey completed March 17, 2022. The lack of action to ensure compliance with regulations had the potential to affect all residents staff and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) A correction order may be issued whenever the commissioner finds upon survey or during a complaint investigation that a facility, a managerial official, an agent of the facility, or staff of the facility is not in compliance with this chapter. [...]”

  • Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a copy of the uniform checklist disclosure of services (UDALSA) with the required content, before executing an assisted living contract for two of two residents (R2, R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a copy of the uniform checklist disclosure of services (UDALSA) with the required content, before executing an assisted living contract for two of two residents (R2, R5). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”

  • Tag 460: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a means for residents to request assistance for health and safety needs 24 hours a day, seven days a week (24/7) for two of two residents (R2, R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide a means for residents to request assistance for health and safety needs 24 hours a day, seven days a week (24/7) for two of two residents (R2, R5). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(5) provide a means for residents to request assistance for health and safety needs 24 hours per day, seven days per week; (6) allow residents the ability to furnish and decorate the resident's unit within the terms of the assisted living contract; (7) permit [...]”

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

Show all 28
  • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. The licensee failed to ensure direct care staff performed adequate hand hygiene (HH) for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

  • Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure, including the name,

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure, including the name, telephone number, and e-mail contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

  • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for two of two residents (R2, R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for two of two residents (R2, R5). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, for two of four employees (licensed assisted living director/clinical nurse supervisor (LALD/CNS)-A, and volunteer (V)-F).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, for two of four employees (licensed assisted living director/clinical nurse supervisor (LALD/CNS)-A, and volunteer (V)-F). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included: TB baseline testing and TB transmission training for one of one volunteer (volunteer (V)-F);

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included: TB baseline testing and TB transmission training for one of one volunteer (volunteer (V)-F); TB history and symptom screening for two of three employees/volunteer (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D, and V-F). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident record included documentation that services were provided as identified in the service plan for two of two residents (R2, R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident record included documentation that services were provided as identified in the service plan for two of two residents (R2, R5). [...]”

    Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the current Minnesota Fire Code provisions.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the current Minnesota Fire Code provisions. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) provide smoke alarms outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of bedrooms; (iii) provide smoke [...]”

  • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2-3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide or maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide or maintain fire extinguishers as required throughout the facility. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff, visitors, and residents. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content, make the plan readily available, provide required training and drills.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content, make the plan readily available, provide required training and drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to obtain a cleared Minnesota

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to obtain a cleared Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) background study clearance prior to providing services for one of one volunteer staff (volunteer (V)-F). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (a) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency was completed with all required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency was completed with all required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”

  • Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluation was completed with all required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluation was completed with all required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”

  • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing delegated nursing or therapy tasks within 30 days of first providing those services for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing delegated nursing or therapy tasks within 30 days of first providing those services for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

  • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required amount of dementia care training was completed in the required time frame in accordance with 144G.64 for two of two employees, (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the required amount of dementia care training was completed in the required time frame in accordance with 144G.64 for two of two employees, (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing resident monitoring and

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing resident monitoring and reassessment, utilizing a uniform assessment tool, no more than 14 days after admission for one of two residents (R2), and not more than 90 days from the previous assessment for two of two residents (R2, R5). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

  • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the current service plan included a signature or other authentication by the resident and the facility to document agreement on the services to be provided for two of three residents (R2, R3).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the current service plan included a signature or other authentication by the resident and the facility to document agreement on the services to be provided for two of three residents (R2, R3). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident service plan included the required content for three of three residents (R2, R3, R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident service plan included the required content for three of three residents (R2, R3, R5). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large [...]”

    Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

  • Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a face-to-face medication management reassessment at least annually for two of two residents (R2, R5) who received medication management services.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a face-to-face medication management reassessment at least annually for two of two residents (R2, R5) who received medication management services. [...]”

    Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management plan with the required content for two of two residents (R2, R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management plan with the required content for two of two residents (R2, R5). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

  • Tag 1770: 144G.71 Subd. 9 Documentation of medication setup Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to document all required content for medication set up for two of two residents (R2, R5). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic [...]”

    Rule cited: “Documentation of dates of medication setup, name of medication, quantity of dose, times to be administered, route of administration, and name of person completing medication setup must be done at the time of setup.”

  • Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the facility failed to store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartment according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access for two of two residents (R2, R5).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartment according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access for two of two residents (R2, R5). [...]”

    Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

  • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care standards, medical or nursing standards for four of five residents (R2, R3, R4, R5) who utilized hospital style bed rails.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care standards, medical or nursing standards for four of five residents (R2, R3, R4, R5) who utilized hospital style bed rails. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 510 (144g.41 Subd. 3 - Infection Control Program): $500.00
  • Tag 1290 (144g.60 Subdivision 1 - Background Studies Required): $3,000.00
  • Tag 2310 (144g.91 Subd. 4 (a) - Appropriate Care And Services): $3,000.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $6,500.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • March 17, 2022: report O2RO11 · 23 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed March 17, 2022: 23 correction orders

    • Tag 110: 144G.10 Subdivision 1a Assisted living director license required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employment of an assisted living director (LALD) licensed by the Board of Executives for Long Term Services and Supports (BELTSS).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employment of an assisted living director (LALD) licensed by the Board of Executives for Long Term Services and Supports (BELTSS). This had the potential to affect all residents receiving Assisted Living services. This resulted in an immediate correction order issued on March 22, 2022. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must employ an assisted living director licensed or permitted by the Board of Executives for Long Term Services and Supports.”

    • Tag 250: 144G.20 Subdivision 1 Conditions Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to show they met the requirements of licensure, by attesting the managerial officials who oversaw the day-to-day operations understood applicable statutes and rules; nor developed and/or implemented current policies and procedures as required with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to show they met the requirements of licensure, by attesting the managerial officials who oversaw the day-to-day operations understood applicable statutes and rules; nor developed and/or implemented current policies and procedures as required with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The commissioner may refuse to grant a provisional license, refuse to grant a license as a result of a change in ownership, refuse to renew a license, suspend or revoke a license, or impose a conditional license if the owner, controlling individual, or [...]”

    • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a staffing plan was developed, implemented, and evaluated for appropriateness of staffing levels as required.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a staffing plan was developed, implemented, and evaluated for appropriateness of staffing levels as required. This had the potential to affect all of the licensee's residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain an effective infection control program that complied with accepted health, medical and nursing standards for infection control related to hygiene for one of five residents (R3) observed during medication administration.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observations, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to maintain an effective infection control program that complied with accepted health, medical and nursing standards for infection control related to hygiene for one of five residents (R3) observed during medication administration. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

    Show all 23
    • Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure and contact information for the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care and Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure and contact information for the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care and Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving assisted living services, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and e-mail contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

    • Tag 570: 144G.42 Subdivision 1 Display of license Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to display the original current license at the main entrance of the assisted living facility as

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to display the original current license at the main entrance of the assisted living facility as required. This had the potential to affect all of the licensee's current residents, staff and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The original current license must be displayed at the main entrance of each assisted living facility. The facility must provide a copy of the license to any person who requests it.”

    • Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to engage in quality management activity appropriate to the size of the facility, relevant to the type of services provided, and failed to maintain documentation on quality management activities.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to engage in quality management activity appropriate to the size of the facility, relevant to the type of services provided, and failed to maintain documentation on quality management activities. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”

    • Tag 640: 144G.42 Subd. 7 Posting information for reporting suspected c Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post the required content in common areas to include: 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided by the assisted living facility and the reporting number for the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) to report suspected maltreatment of a vulnerable adult under section 626.557.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to post the required content in common areas to include: 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided by the assisted living facility and the reporting number for the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) to report suspected maltreatment of a vulnerable adult under section 626.557. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving assisted living services, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The facility shall support protection and safety through access to the state's systems for reporting suspected criminal activity and suspected vulnerable adult maltreatment by: (1) posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the required fire safety training and evacuation plans for residents and staff.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide the required fire safety training and evacuation plans for residents and staff. This has the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 1300: 144G.60 Subd. 2 Qualifications, training, and competency Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure unlicensed personnel (ULP) were trained and competent in the provision of services with current practice standards appropriate to the residents' needs for three of three employees (ULP-A, ULP-B, and

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on record review and interview, the licensee failed to ensure unlicensed personnel (ULP) were trained and competent in the provision of services with current practice standards appropriate to the residents' needs for three of three employees (ULP-A, ULP-B, and ULP-C) with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “All staff persons providing assisted living services must be trained and competent in the provision of services consistent with current practice standards appropriate to the resident's needs, and promote and be trained to support the assisted living bill of [...]”

    • Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) trained and competency-evaluated staff in all required topics for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, ULP-B, and ULP-C) with employee records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) trained and competency-evaluated staff in all required topics for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, ULP-B, and ULP-C) with employee records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”

    • Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) trained and competency-tested direct care staff in all required topics for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, ULP-B, and ULP-C) with employee records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) trained and competency-tested direct care staff in all required topics for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, ULP-B, and ULP-C) with employee records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”

    • Tag 1450: 144G.62 Subd. 5 Documentation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure documentation of direct supervision of staff performing delegated tasks for three of three unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, ULP-B, and ULP-C) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, observation, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure documentation of direct supervision of staff performing delegated tasks for three of three unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, ULP-B, and ULP-C) with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “A facility must retain documentation of supervision activities in the personnel records.”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure three of three

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, ULP-B, and ULP-C) with records reviewed received orientation to 144G licensing requirements. The had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1480: 144G.63 Subd. 3 Orientation to resident Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure staff providing assisted living services were oriented specifically to each individual resident and the services to be provided to individual residents for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, ULP-B, and ULP-C), with employee records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure staff providing assisted living services were oriented specifically to each individual resident and the services to be provided to individual residents for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, ULP-B, and ULP-C), with employee records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Staff providing assisted living services must be oriented specifically to each individual resident and the services to be provided. This orientation may be provided in person, orally, in writing, or electronically.”

    • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident service plan included the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, and R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident service plan included the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, and R3) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

    • Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure reassessment and monitoring of medication management services for three of three residents (R1, R2, and R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure reassessment and monitoring of medication management services for three of three residents (R1, R2, and R3) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”

    • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management record with the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, and R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management record with the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, and R3) with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure security and accountability for the overall management, control, and disposition of medications.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and document review, the licensee failed to ensure security and accountability for the overall management, control, and disposition of medications. This had the potential to affect all five residents receiving assisted living services, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”

    • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to document in resident records disposition of medications with the the signature and verification of two staff members accounting for the medications.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to document in resident records disposition of medications with the the signature and verification of two staff members accounting for the medications. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a treatment management plan to include all required content and/or revised as needed for one of three residents (R1) with record reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop a treatment management plan to include all required content and/or revised as needed for one of three residents (R1) with record reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 Appropriate care and services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure care and services were provided according to a suitable and up-to-date plan and subject to accepted health care and medical standards for one of five residents (R4) observed for transfers.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure care and services were provided according to a suitable and up-to-date plan and subject to accepted health care and medical standards for one of five residents (R4) observed for transfers. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

    From MDH’s letter: MDH granted the assisted living license; no immediate fines.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 6 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee LOVING CARE COTTAGE LLC
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
421799
License status
Active
Current license dated
2025-08-01
Licensed capacity
6
Licensee
LOVING CARE COTTAGE LLC
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Charity Weinreich

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 5.7 mi, nursing home 0.6 mi, pharmacy 0.7 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
M Health Fairview Woodwinds Hospital, Woodbury. 5.7 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 4 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Norris Square, Cottage Grove. 0.6 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Spectrum Community Health Inc, Inver Grove Heights. 3.1 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 0.7 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55016 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Cottage Grove Dialysis, Cottage Grove, 2.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 5 of 5 stars)
Davita Woodbury Dialysis, Woodbury, 6.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fresenius Kidney Care Woodbury, Woodbury, 6.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
24 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55016.
Hospice Of The Midwest, office in Woodbury, 6.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
St Croix Hospice, office in Oakdale, 8.1 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Beyond Hospice, office in Oakdale, 11.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Fairview Clinics, Eagan. 9.6 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively low, tornado very high, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Loving Care Cottage provide?

Loving Care Cottage is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Cottage Grove, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 6 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Loving Care Cottage?

No. We publish state licensing details for Loving Care Cottage but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Loving Care Cottage cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Loving Care Cottage does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Loving Care Cottage?

Visit Loving Care Cottage at 7740 Hadley Avenue South, Cottage Grove, MN 55016.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid