Lilisity

Assisted Living

Lakeview Retirement Residence

1401 Lake Street Nw, Warroad, MN 56763 · Map
Licensed for 54 residents · LAKEVIEW RETIREMENT RESIDENCE

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Lakeview Retirement Residence is a state-licensed assisted living community in Warroad, Minnesota. It is licensed for 54 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
54 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Aug 7, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 54 residents

Assisted Living Facility 421214, current license dated Aug 1, 2025. Licensee LAKEVIEW RETIREMENT RESIDENCE.

Nearest emergency room

19.6 miles

Lifecare Medical Center.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 2 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Lakeview Retirement Residence this community54Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Lifecare Assisted Living - Gre41.6 mi16Not publishedActive0 substantiated
The Meadows58.6 mi24Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
August 7, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (August 7, 2025, state report 1PJP11)

MDH: “On August 4, 2025, through August 7, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed August 7, 2025: 7 correction orders

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z. In addition, the licensee failed to ensure the missing

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z. In addition, the licensee failed to ensure the missing resident plan was reviewed quarterly. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors of the facility. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “*Amended on August 25, 2025, to include background study affiliation. Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure current employee records contained all the required content to include a current background study clearance letter for one of nine employees (housekeeping (HSKPG)-E). In addition, the licensee failed to affiliate a background study to the licensee's healthcare facility identification number (HFID) for one of eight employees (dietary aide (DA)-K). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1550: 144G.64 (a) (4) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure two of two employees (director of maintenance (DM)-H, housekeeping (HSKPG)-E) received the required amount of mental illness and de-escalation in the required time frame.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure two of two employees (director of maintenance (DM)-H, housekeeping (HSKPG)-E) received the required amount of mental illness and de-escalation in the required time frame. In addition, the licensee failed to ensure one of two employees (DM-H) received annual dementia training for each 12 months of employment after hire. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(4) staff who do not provide direct care, including maintenance, housekeeping, and food service staff, must have at least four hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b), clauses (1) to (5), and two hours of initial training on mental [...]”

  • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident (R4) with a consumer bed rail.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident (R4) with a consumer bed rail. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd.2. (a) - Fire Protection And PhysicalEnvironment): $500.00
  • Tag 1290 (144g.60 Subdivision1 - BackgroundStudiesRequired): $1,000.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $1,500.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • April 26, 2022: report 4T6811 · 16 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed April 26, 2022: 16 correction orders

    • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3). In addition, the licensee failed to ensure an IAPP was developed for one of one resident (R4) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

    • Tag 640: 144G.42 Subd. 7 Posting information for reporting suspected c Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to support protection and safety through access to the state's systems for reporting suspected criminal activity and suspected vulnerable adult maltreatment as required.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to support protection and safety through access to the state's systems for reporting suspected criminal activity and suspected vulnerable adult maltreatment as required. This had the potential to affect all of the licensee's current residents, staff and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The facility shall support protection and safety through access to the state's systems for reporting suspected criminal activity and suspected vulnerable adult maltreatment by: (1) posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided [...]”

    • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z, with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z, with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

    • Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute an assisted living contract to include all required content for one of one resident (R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute an assisted living contract to include all required content for one of one resident (R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 970: 144.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”

    Show all 16
    • Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations contained all the required training for three of three unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-C, ULP-E, ULP-F) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations contained all the required training for three of three unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-C, ULP-E, ULP-F) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”

    • Tag 1460: 144G.63 Subdivision 1 Orientation of staff and supervisors Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure staff providing and supervising direct services completed an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing services for one of one employee (licensed practical nurse (LPN)-D) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure staff providing and supervising direct services completed an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing services for one of one employee (licensed practical nurse (LPN)-D) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “All staff providing and supervising direct services must complete an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing assisted living services to residents. [...]”

    • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure service plans included the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3,) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure service plans included the required content for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3,) with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents who received assisted living services from the licensee. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

    • Tag 1690: 144G.71 Subdivision 1 Medication management services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop, implement, and maintain current medication management policies and procedures that were developed under the supervision and direction of a registered nurse (RN) consistent with current practice standards and guidelines, with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop, implement, and maintain current medication management policies and procedures that were developed under the supervision and direction of a registered nurse (RN) consistent with current practice standards and guidelines, with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) This section applies only to assisted living facilities that provide medication management services. [...]”

    • Tag 1700: 144G.71 Subd. 2 Provision of medication management services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted an individualized medication assessment with the required content for two of three residents (R1, R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted an individualized medication assessment with the required content for two of three residents (R1, R3) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident who requests medication management services, the facility shall, prior to providing medication management services, have a registered nurse, licensed health professional, or authorized prescriber under section 151.37 conduct an [...]”

    • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) maintained a current individualized medication management plan following a change in condition and a change in medication management services for one of three residents (R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) maintained a current individualized medication management plan following a change in condition and a change in medication management services for one of three residents (R3) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1770: 144G.71 Subd. 9 Documentation of medication setup Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure documentation of medication setup included all the required content for one of one resident (R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure documentation of medication setup included all the required content for one of one resident (R3) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Documentation of dates of medication setup, name of medication, quantity of dose, times to be administered, route of administration, and name of person completing medication setup must be done at the time of setup.”

    • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a prescription drug had the original prescription label as required for one of one resident (R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a prescription drug had the original prescription label as required for one of one resident (R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

    • Tag 1930: 144G.72 Subd. 2 Policies and procedures Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop, implement, and maintain up-to-date written treatment or therapy management policies and procedures that were developed under the supervision and direction of a registered nurse (RN) consistent with current practice standards and guidelines with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop, implement, and maintain up-to-date written treatment or therapy management policies and procedures that were developed under the supervision and direction of a registered nurse (RN) consistent with current practice standards and guidelines with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility that provides treatment and therapy management services must develop, implement, and maintain up-to-date written treatment or therapy management policies and procedures. [...]”

    • Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure specific written instructions for each resident were documented in one of one resident's record (R3) who received blood glucose monitoring.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure specific written instructions for each resident were documented in one of one resident's record (R3) who received blood glucose monitoring. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

    • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 Appropriate care and services Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care, medical, or nursing standards for three of three residents (R6, R7, R8) with bedrails who lacked a bed rail assessment and an explanation of risks and benefits of the use of bed rails.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care, medical, or nursing standards for three of three residents (R6, R7, R8) with bedrails who lacked a bed rail assessment and an explanation of risks and benefits of the use of bed rails. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

    From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 54 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee LAKEVIEW RETIREMENT RESIDENCE
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
421214
License status
Active
Current license dated
2025-08-01
Licensed capacity
54
Licensee
LAKEVIEW RETIREMENT RESIDENCE
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Betsy Theriault

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 19.6 mi, nursing home 0.0 mi, pharmacy 1.1 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Lifecare Medical Center, Roseau. 19.6 miles away, straight line.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Warroad Care Center, Warroad. 0.0 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Lifecare Medical Center, Roseau. 19.6 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Thrifty White Pharmacy. 1.1 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 56763 as rural (rural area).
Hospice
3 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 56763.
Lifecare Hospice, office in Roseau, 19.6 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Phs Indian Hospital, Red Lake. 66.5 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
Wildfire risk to homes
In Roseau County, MN, risk to homes is greater than 98% of communities in Minnesota and 86% of communities nationwide. USDA rates the whole county, not this address. (USDA Forest Service, Wildfire Risk to Communities, April 2026)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively high, wildfire relatively high, tornado relatively low, heat wave relatively low, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  4. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  5. What fees are charged at move-in?
  6. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  7. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  8. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  9. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
  10. Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026See above
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Lakeview Retirement Residence provide?

Lakeview Retirement Residence is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Warroad, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 54 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Lakeview Retirement Residence?

No. We publish state licensing details for Lakeview Retirement Residence but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Lakeview Retirement Residence cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Lakeview Retirement Residence does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Lakeview Retirement Residence?

Visit Lakeview Retirement Residence at 1401 Lake Street Nw, Warroad, MN 56763.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid