Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

Lake Song Assisted Living

206 Crosier Drive North, Onamia, MN 56359 · Map
Licensed for 37 residents · LAKE SONG ASSISTED LIVING

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Lake Song Assisted Living is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Onamia, Minnesota. It is licensed for 37 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
37 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility dementia care
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Minnesota typically starts at $3,900 to $8,600 a month. Based on 40 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Care and services

From the community’s website

What Lake Song Assisted Living says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.

  • Apartment types named: one-bedroom, two-bedroom. One-bedroom, one-bedroom + den, and two-bedroom units fit different needs and preferences. (page, checked Oct 15, 2026)

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

1Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Aug 13, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 37 residents

Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 425277, current license dated May 1, 2026. Licensee LAKE SONG ASSISTED LIVING.

State inspection record1 substantiated
Last evaluation
August 13, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
1 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
1 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (August 13, 2025, state report 97FP11)

MDH: “On November 5, 2025, through November 6, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a follow-up survey at the above provider to follow-up on orders issued pursuant to a survey completed on August 13, 2025.”

Survey completed November 6, 2025: 18 correction orders

  • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

  • Tag 485: 144G.41 Subdivision 1.a (a) Minimum requirements; required food services (re-issued) scope/level letter C
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must offer to provide or make available at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) [...]”

  • Tag 500: 144G.41 Subd. 2 Policies and procedures (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must have policies and procedures in place to address the following and keep them current: (1) requirements in section 626.557, reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults; (2) conducting and handling background studies on [...]”

  • Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

  • Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”

Show all 18
  • Tag 640: 144G.42 Subd. 7 Posting information for reporting suspected c (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “The facility shall support protection and safety through access to the state's systems for reporting suspected criminal activity and suspected vulnerable adult maltreatment by: (1) posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “{0 775} 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical {0 775} SS=F environment Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: This MN Requirement is not met as evidenced by:”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required (re-issued) scope/level letter E
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

  • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) (3) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care staff must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

  • Tag 1690: 144G.71 Subdivision 1 Medication management services (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) This section applies only to assisted living facilities that provide medication management services. [...]”

  • Tag 1780: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility that is providing medication management services to the resident must develop and implement policies and procedures for giving accurate and current medications to residents for planned or unplanned times away from home [...]”

  • Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”

  • Tag 1930: 144G.72 Subd. 2 Policies and procedures (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility that provides treatment and therapy management services must develop, implement, and maintain up-to-date written treatment or therapy management policies and procedures. [...]”

  • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies (re-issued) scope/level letter F
    Details

    Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

  • Tag 2170: 144G.84 SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA (re-issued) scope/level letter D
    Details

    Rule cited: “(b) Each resident must be evaluated for activities according to the licensing rules of the facility. [...]”

  • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the care and services

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident (R4) with an assistive device (consumer bed rail). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

Survey completed August 13, 2025: 19 correction orders

  • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post a daily work schedule at the beginning of each work shift.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to post a daily work schedule at the beginning of each work shift. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

  • Tag 485: 144G.41 Subdivision 1.a (a) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the Assisted Living

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the Assisted Living contract did not require any resident to include and pay for meals as a part of their assisted living package fee. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must offer to provide or make available at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) [...]”

  • Tag 500: 144G.41 Subd. 2 Policies and procedures Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to show they had met the requirements of licensure, by attesting the managerial officials who were in charge of the day-to-day operations, had developed and implemented current policies and procedures, as required.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to show they had met the requirements of licensure, by attesting the managerial officials who were in charge of the day-to-day operations, had developed and implemented current policies and procedures, as required. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must have policies and procedures in place to address the following and keep them current: (1) requirements in section 626.557, reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults; (2) conducting and handling background studies on [...]”

  • Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post in a conspicuous place, the contact information for the Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities (OOMHDD).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to post in a conspicuous place, the contact information for the Office of Ombudsman for Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities (OOMHDD). This had the potential to affect the licensee's current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

  • Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain documentation of quality management activity programs appropriate to the size and relevant to the type of services provided.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain documentation of quality management activity programs appropriate to the size and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”

    Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”

Show all 19
  • Tag 640: 144G.42 Subd. 7 Posting information for reporting suspected c Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to support protection and safety by not posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided by the facility as required.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to support protection and safety by not posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided by the facility as required. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “The facility shall support protection and safety through access to the state's systems for reporting suspected criminal activity and suspected vulnerable adult maltreatment by: (1) posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided [...]”

  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for two of three employees (clinical nurse supervisor/CNS-A, unlicensed personnel/ULP-C).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for two of three employees (clinical nurse supervisor/CNS-A, unlicensed personnel/ULP-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content defined in Appendix Z. This had

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content defined in Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect residents receiving services under the assisted living license, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Two (2) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure background studies were affiliated with their health facility

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure background studies were affiliated with their health facility identification (HFID) for five of six employees (clinical nurse supervisor/CNS-A, registered nurse/RN-H, unlicensed personnel/ULP-C, ULP-E, ULP-G). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure annual training included all required topics for each 12 months of employment for one of three employees (clinical nurse supervisor/CNS-A).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure annual training included all required topics for each 12 months of employment for one of three employees (clinical nurse supervisor/CNS-A). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

  • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) (3) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure one of three employees (unlicensed personnel/ULP-E) received the required amount of mental illness and de-escalation training within the required time frame.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure one of three employees (unlicensed personnel/ULP-E) received the required amount of mental illness and de-escalation training within the required time frame. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care staff must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

  • Tag 1690: 144G.71 Subdivision 1 Medication management services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain current written medication management policies and procedures under the supervision and direction of a registered nurse (RN).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain current written medication management policies and procedures under the supervision and direction of a registered nurse (RN). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) This section applies only to assisted living facilities that provide medication management services. [...]”

  • Tag 1780: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for giving accurate and current medications for those residents who received medication management services having planned and unplanned times away from home.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for giving accurate and current medications for those residents who received medication management services having planned and unplanned times away from home. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility that is providing medication management services to the resident must develop and implement policies and procedures for giving accurate and current medications to residents for planned or unplanned times away from home [...]”

  • Tag 1790: 144G.71 Subd. 10 Medication management for residents who will Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) developed comprehensive written procedures for the unlicensed personnel (ULP) providing medications for residents having unplanned time away when the licensed nurse was not available.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) developed comprehensive written procedures for the unlicensed personnel (ULP) providing medications for residents having unplanned time away when the licensed nurse was not available. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(2) for unplanned time away, when the pharmacy is not able to provide the medications, a licensed nurse or unlicensed personnel shall provide medications in amounts and dosages needed for the length of the anticipated absence, not to exceed seven calendar [...]”

  • Tag 1930: 144G.72 Subd. 2 Policies and procedures Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain current written treatment management policies and procedures under the supervision and direction of a registered nurse (RN).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain current written treatment management policies and procedures under the supervision and direction of a registered nurse (RN). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility that provides treatment and therapy management services must develop, implement, and maintain up-to-date written treatment or therapy management policies and procedures. [...]”

  • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure policies and procedures required in the licensing of assisted living facilities with dementia care were developed and provided to each resident and the residents' legal and designated representative at the time of move-in.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure policies and procedures required in the licensing of assisted living facilities with dementia care were developed and provided to each resident and the residents' legal and designated representative at the time of move-in. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

  • Tag 2170: 144G.84 SERVICES FOR RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to conduct an evaluation for activities that addressed all provisions and failed to develop an individualized activity plan based on the evaluation for one of two residents (R2) who resided in an assisted living with dementia care facility.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to conduct an evaluation for activities that addressed all provisions and failed to develop an individualized activity plan based on the evaluation for one of two residents (R2) who resided in an assisted living with dementia care facility. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each resident must be evaluated for activities according to the licensing rules of the facility. [...]”

  • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: IMMEDIATE · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident (R1) with an assistive device (consumer bed rail) and one of one resident (R2) with hospital-style bed rails.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident (R1) with an assistive device (consumer bed rail) and one of one resident (R2) with hospital-style bed rails. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd.2. (a) - Fire Protection And PhysicalEnvironment): $500.00
  • Tag 2310 (144g.91 Subd.4 (a) - Appropriate CareAnd Services): $1,000.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $1,500.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • March 1, 2023: report ZPJX11 · 16 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed March 1, 2023: 16 correction orders

    • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement a staffing plan to determine staffing levels to meet the needs of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement a staffing plan to determine staffing levels to meet the needs of the residents. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

    • Tag 640: 144G.42 Subd. 7 Posting information for reporting suspected c Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post the required information to include posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided by the assisted living facility This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to post the required information to include posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided by the assisted living facility This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The facility shall support protection and safety through access to the state's systems for reporting suspected criminal activity and suspected vulnerable adult maltreatment by: (1) posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents. This deficient condition had the potential to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the required resident and employee training on fire safety and evacuation plans.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain the required resident and employee training on fire safety and evacuation plans. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    Show all 16
    • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a background study was submitted and a clearance received in affiliation with the assisted living with dementia care license for three of three registered nurses ((RN)- E, RN-G and RN-H) utilized to conduct assessments from the integrated health system home care agency.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a background study was submitted and a clearance received in affiliation with the assisted living with dementia care license for three of three registered nurses ((RN)- E, RN-G and RN-H) utilized to conduct assessments from the integrated health system home care agency. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

    • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure direct supervision of staff performing delegated tasks was provided within 30 calendar days after the date on which the individual begins working for the licensee for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D, ULP-F)

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure direct supervision of staff performing delegated tasks was provided within 30 calendar days after the date on which the individual begins working for the licensee for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D, ULP-F) This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

    • Tag 1460: 144G.63 Subdivision 1 Orientation of staff and supervisors Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide staff orientation to assisted living licensing requirements and regulations for three of three registered nurses ((RN)-E, RN-G, RN-H) who provided RN services for licensee.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide staff orientation to assisted living licensing requirements and regulations for three of three registered nurses ((RN)-E, RN-G, RN-H) who provided RN services for licensee. [...]”

      Rule cited: “All staff providing and supervising direct services must complete an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing assisted living services to residents. [...]”

    • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure service plans included the required content for two of three residents (R1, R3).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure service plans included the required content for two of three residents (R1, R3). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment or death), and was issued at a pattern scope (when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a [...]”

      Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individual treatment management plan with all required content for one of three residents (R3) who received ordered treatments.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individual treatment management plan with all required content for one of three residents (R3) who received ordered treatments. [...]”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) specified, in writing, specific instructions and documented those instructions in the resident record for one of three residents (R3).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) specified, in writing, specific instructions and documented those instructions in the resident record for one of three residents (R3). [...]”

      Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

    • Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7)
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure treatments or therapies were administered as prescribed, or to document the reason they were not provided to meet the resident's needs for one of three (R3) residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure treatments or therapies were administered as prescribed, or to document the reason they were not provided to meet the resident's needs for one of three (R3) residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”

    • Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure up-to-date written or an electronically recorded order was maintained for one of three residents (R3) who received a treatment managed by the provider.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure up-to-date written or an electronically recorded order was maintained for one of three residents (R3) who received a treatment managed by the provider. [...]”

      Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”

    • Tag 2040: 144G.81 Subdivision 1 Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk assessment of the physical environment on and around the property for the facility.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on record review and interview, the licensee failed to provide hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk assessment of the physical environment on and around the property for the facility. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care that has a secured dementia care unit must meet the requirements of section 144G.45 and the following additional requirements: (1) a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk must be performed on and around [...]”

    • Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement all required policies and procedures related to dementia care.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement all required policies and procedures related to dementia care. In addition, the licensee failed to provide dementia care policies to residents and the residents' legal and designated representatives at the time of move in. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”

    • Tag 2260: 144G.90 Subd. 3 Notice of dementia training Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide in written or electronic form to residents, families, or other persons who request it, an accurate description of the dementia care training program with the required content.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide in written or electronic form to residents, families, or other persons who request it, an accurate description of the dementia care training program with the required content. [...]”

      Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care shall make available in written or electronic form, to residents and families or other persons who request it, a description of the training program and related training it provides, including the categories of [...]”

    From MDH’s letter: no immediate fines.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

  • May 23, 2024 · report HL305479407M · MDH finding: Substantiated, facility responsibility
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when staff failed to administer the resident's medications according to physician orders and the resident required hospitalization.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated.”

    “The facility was responsible for the maltreatment.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect substantiated (facility responsibility).

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The facility was responsible for the maltreatment. Facility staff failed to supervise administration of medication and the resident missed various medications over an approximate two-month period. The resident was hospitalized for fluid overload and NSTEMI (non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction), a type of heart attack.”

    Action taken by facility: “The facility reported the medication error to the primary care provider.”

    Action taken by MDH: “The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”

    Survey completed April 15, 2024: 3 correction orders

    • Tag 620: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (a) / 626.557, Subd. 3 Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to report an allegation of suspected neglect to Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) within 24 hours of staff becoming aware of the incident for one of one resident (R1).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of suspected neglect to Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) within 24 hours of staff becoming aware of the incident for one of one resident (R1). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The assisted living facility must comply with the requirements for the reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults in section 626.557. [...]”

    • Tag 2320: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (b) Appropriate care and services Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services in accordance with the service plan, when staff failed to administer medications as ordered, resulting in medication error(s) for one of one resident (R1) reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services in accordance with the service plan, when staff failed to administer medications as ordered, resulting in medication error(s) for one of one resident (R1) reviewed. After being hospitalized with chest pain, 62 pills were found in the resident's recliner. Medications found included various vitamins, an antibiotic, a medication to reduce extra fluid in the body. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Residents have the right to receive health care and other assisted living services with continuity from people who are properly trained and competent to perform their duties and in sufficient numbers to adequately provide the services agreed to in the [...]”

    • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one residents reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one residents reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and the facility was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”

      Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

Unsubstantiated investigations (1)
  • April 29, 2026 · report HL305471500M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP), facility unlicensed staff, neglected the resident when the AP did not follow the plan of care and the resident fell resulting in death.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”

    “The AP was not responsible for the maltreatment.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The AP was not responsible for the maltreatment. The AP followed the resident's plan of care. The resident's care plan directed unlicensed staff to allow the resident time and reapproach when the resident was agitated. When the AP offered toileting assistance to the resident, the resident became agitated, and the resident declined assistance. The AP told the resident she would return to check on her. When the AP returned, the resident was on the floor not breathing. Emergency services were called, and the resident was pronounced deceased.”

    Action taken by facility: “The facility completed an internal investigation and held an all staff meeting to review the incident and emergency processes.”

    Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time”

    Survey completed March 10, 2026: no correction orders issued.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 37 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee LAKE SONG ASSISTED LIVING
License type
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
License number
425277
License status
Active
Current license dated
2026-05-01
Licensed capacity
37
Licensee
LAKE SONG ASSISTED LIVING
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Holly Downing

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  4. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  5. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  6. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  7. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  8. What fees are charged at move-in?
  9. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  10. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked8 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteSee above
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Lake Song Assisted Living provide?

Lake Song Assisted Living is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Onamia, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 37 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Lake Song Assisted Living?

No. We publish state licensing details for Lake Song Assisted Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Lake Song Assisted Living cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Lake Song Assisted Living does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Lake Song Assisted Living?

Use Lake Song Assisted Living's website, lakesong.org, or visit at 206 Crosier Drive North, Onamia, MN 56359.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid