Lilisity

Assisted Living

Kayli Residence

8256 Scott Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 · Map
Licensed for 5 residents · KAYLI RESIDENCE LLC

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Kayli Residence is a state-licensed assisted living community in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. It is licensed for 5 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
5 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,500 to $4,400/moTypical assisted living start in Hennepin County, from 18 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Apr 7, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 5 residents

Assisted Living Facility 424944, current license dated May 17, 2026. Licensee KAYLI RESIDENCE LLC.

Nearest emergency room

5.7 miles

Mercy Hospital, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Kayli Residence this community5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Home Partners0.1 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Triumph Care Group0.2 mi5Not publishedActiveNo record
Serenity Healthcare Services0.2 mi5Not publishedActiveNo record
First Choice Nursing Services, 81st Avenue North0.3 mi5Not publishedActive1 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
April 7, 2026
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (April 7, 2026, state report 3WGC11)

MDH: “On April 6, 2026, through April 7, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider, and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed April 7, 2026: 6 correction orders

  • Tag 910: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (a-b) Contract information Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for three of three residents who resided in the licensee's facility.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for three of three residents who resided in the licensee's facility. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The contract must include in a conspicuous place and manner on the contract the legal name and the health facility identification of the facility. [...]”

  • Tag 930: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (d-e; 1-4) Contract information Level 1, pattern scope, scope/level letter B · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with all required content for two of three residents (R1, R3).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with all required content for two of three residents (R1, R3). This practice resulted in a level one violation (a violation that will cause only minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety) and was issued at a pattern scope (when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred [...]”

    Rule cited: “(d) The contract must include a description of the facility's complaint resolution process available to residents, including the name and contact information of the person representing the facility who is designated to handle and resolve complaints. [...]”

  • Tag 950: 144G.50 Subd. 3 Designation of representative Level 1, isolated scope, scope/level letter A · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to include the required statutory language giving residents the right to identify a designated representative on its own separate page for one of three residents (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to include the required statutory language giving residents the right to identify a designated representative on its own separate page for one of three residents (R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Before or at the time of execution of an assisted living contract, an assisted living facility must offer the resident the opportunity to identify a designated representative in writing in the contract and must provide the following verbatim notice on a [...]”

  • Tag 1330: 144G.60 Subd. 4 (b) Unlicensed personnel Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations were completed for all required skill areas, prior to providing services, for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations were completed for all required skill areas, prior to providing services, for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Unlicensed personnel performing delegated nursing tasks in an assisted living facility must: (1) have successfully completed training and demonstrated competency by successfully completing a written or oral test of the topics in section 144G.61, [...]”

  • Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the current service plan included a signature or other authentication by the resident or resident's designated representative and the licensee to document agreement on the services to be provided for one of three residents (R3).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the current service plan included a signature or other authentication by the resident or resident's designated representative and the licensee to document agreement on the services to be provided for one of three residents (R3). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a medication was labeled with the resident's name for one of one resident (R2) who utilized insulin.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a medication was labeled with the resident's name for one of one resident (R2) who utilized insulin. [...]”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): No orders were issued for this inspection report.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • June 26, 2024: report WNB011 · 5 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed June 26, 2024: 5 correction orders

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records included all required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, agent (A)-B).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records included all required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, agent (A)-B). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 690: 144G.43 Subdivision 1 Resident record Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure entries in resident records were authenticated with the name and title of the person making the entry for one of one resident (R1).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure entries in resident records were authenticated with the name and title of the person making the entry for one of one resident (R1). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Assisted living facilities must maintain records for each resident for whom it is providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure up-to-date written or electronic treatment orders were maintained for one of one resident (R1) who had a treatment.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure up-to-date written or electronic treatment orders were maintained for one of one resident (R1) who had a treatment. [...]”

      Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”

    From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; MDH granted the assisted living license; no immediate fines.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee KAYLI RESIDENCE LLC
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
424944
License status
Active
Current license dated
2026-05-17
Licensed capacity
5
Licensee
KAYLI RESIDENCE LLC
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Victoria Munyeka

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 5.7 mi, nursing home 0.5 mi, pharmacy 0.7 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Mercy Hospital, Coon Rapids. 5.7 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake, Brooklyn Park. 0.5 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Aspen Home Health Care Inc, Brooklyn Park. 1.0 mile away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 0.7 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55443 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita New Hope Dialysis Center, New Hope, 3.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fresenius Kidney Care Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Center, 3.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fmc Dialysis - North Suburban, Coon Rapids, 4.3 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
28 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55443.
Serenity Hospice Homes LLC, office in Brooklyn Park, 2.1 miles away, straight line
Mary T Hospice, office in Coon Rapids, 6.0 miles away, straight line
North Memorial Home Hlth Hospc, office in Robbinsdale, 6.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Hennepin Healthcare System Inc, Brooklyn Park. 0.8 miles away, straight line. 2 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Kayli Residence provide?

Kayli Residence is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 5 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Kayli Residence?

No. We publish state licensing details for Kayli Residence but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Kayli Residence cost?

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Kayli Residence does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Kayli Residence?

Visit Kayli Residence at 8256 Scott Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, MN 55443.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid