Assisted Living
Healing Homes Living Services
83 Cook Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55117 · Map
Licensed for 3 residents · HEALING HOMES LIVING SERVICES
Healing Homes Living Services is a state-licensed assisted living community in St. Paul, Minnesota. It is licensed for 3 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 3 residents
Assisted Living Facility 425535, current license dated Jun 1, 2026. Licensee HEALING HOMES LIVING SERVICES.
Nearest emergency room
1.3 miles
Regions Hospital, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healing Homes Living Services this community | 3 | Not published | Active | 3 substantiated | |
| Aurora Assisted Living | 0.1 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Sunshine Group Home | 0.1 mi | 4 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated |
| Trusted Care Residence | 0.1 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Avelia Estates | 0.4 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | No record |
State inspection record3 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- December 2, 2024
- Evaluations on record
- 2
- Investigations substantiated
- 3 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 0 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 1 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (December 2, 2024, state report N0SZ11)
MDH: “On November 18, 2024, through December 2, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider.”
Survey completed December 2, 2024: 10 correction orders
- Tag 110: 144G.10 Subdivision 1a Assisted living director license required Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Two (2) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the licensed assisted living director (LALD) was listed as the director of record on the Board of Executives for Long-Term Services and Support (BELTSS) website.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the licensed assisted living director (LALD) was listed as the director of record on the Board of Executives for Long-Term Services and Support (BELTSS) website. This had the potential to affect all the licensee's residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must employ an assisted living director licensed or permitted by the Board of Executives for Long Term Services and Supports.”
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”
- Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to implement and maintain a quality management program appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to implement and maintain a quality management program appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”
- Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included: a current TB blood test for one of two employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B);
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included: a current TB blood test for one of two employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B); TB history and symptom screening for two of two employees (CNS-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content as defined in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors at the assisted living facility.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content as defined in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors at the assisted living facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
Show all 10
- Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the current Minnesota Fire Code provisions.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the current Minnesota Fire Code provisions. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training and drills.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training and drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 950: 144G.50 Subd. 3 Designation of representative Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to offer the resident the opportunity to identify a designated representative in writing with the required statutory language for one of one resident (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to offer the resident the opportunity to identify a designated representative in writing with the required statutory language for one of one resident (R1). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Before or at the time of execution of an assisted living contract, an assisted living facility must offer the resident the opportunity to identify a designated representative in writing in the contract and must provide the following verbatim notice on a [...]”
- Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received the required amount of dementia care training with the required content, for two of two employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received the required amount of dementia care training with the required content, for two of two employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B and unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”
- Tag 3090: 144.6502, Subd. 8 Notice to Visitors Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required posting at the main entry way of the facility, included statutory language to disclose electronic monitoring activity, potentially affecting all current residents in the assisted living facility, staff, and any visitors to the facility.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure the required posting at the main entry way of the facility, included statutory language to disclose electronic monitoring activity, potentially affecting all current residents in the assisted living facility, staff, and any visitors to the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) A facility must post a sign at each facility entrance accessible to visitors that states: "Electronic monitoring devices, including security cameras and audio devices, may be present to record persons and activities." (b) The facility is responsible for [...]”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.
Earlier evaluations (1)
- October 8, 2021: report PYKS11 · 12 correction orders
Details
Survey completed October 8, 2021: 12 correction orders
- Tag 450: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the current assisted living bill of rights (BOR) to one of one resident (R1) with record reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide the current assisted living bill of rights (BOR) to one of one resident (R1) with record reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “All assisted living facilities shall: (1) distribute to residents the assisted living bill of rights; (2) provide services in a manner that complies with the Nurse Practice Act in sections 148.171 to 148.285; (3) utilize a person-centered planning and service [...]”
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared according to the Minnesota Food Code. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”
- Tag 620: 144G.42 Subd. 6 Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7)
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an allegation of alleged maltreatment was reported to Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MARRC) timely for one of one resident (R1) with record reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an allegation of alleged maltreatment was reported to Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MARRC) timely for one of one resident (R1) with record reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “144G.42 Subd. 6. Compliance with requirements for reporting maltreatment of vulnerable adults; abuse prevention plan. (a) The assisted living facility must comply with the requirements for the reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults in section 626.557. [...]”
- Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Immediate
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review the licensee failed to identify a specific intervention for each known vulnerability and failed to update the individual abuse prevention plan after an incident indicated a new vulnerability and the risk of causing harm to self for one of one resident (R1) with record review. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records included all required content for one of two employees (ULP-B) with employee records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records included all required content for one of two employees (ULP-B) with employee records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
Show all 12
- Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure smoke alarms were provided on each story of the home.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure smoke alarms were provided on each story of the home. The licensee also failed to ensure smoke alarms were clean and updated. This had the potential to directly affect all two residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”
- Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”
Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans, failed to provide required training to residents and employees for fire safety and evacuation, and failed to conduct required employee evacuation drills.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans, failed to provide required training to residents and employees for fire safety and evacuation, and failed to conduct required employee evacuation drills. This has the potential to affect the licensee's two (2) residents and staff. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract included a signature or other authentication by the resident and the facility for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract included a signature or other authentication by the resident and the facility for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Immediate
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to complete a change of condition reassessment when a resident
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to complete a change of condition reassessment when a resident presented with new or changed symptoms for one of one resident (R1) with record reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”
- Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 Service plan, implementation, and revisions t Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plan addendum included a signature or other authentication by the resident and the facility to document agreement on the services to be provided for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plan addendum included a signature or other authentication by the resident and the facility to document agreement on the services to be provided for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”
- Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed re-assessments when there was change in the resident's medications and potential side effects after R1 admitted to usage of non-prescribed drug use for one of one resident (R1) with record reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed re-assessments when there was change in the resident's medications and potential side effects after R1 admitted to usage of non-prescribed drug use for one of one resident (R1) with record reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.
- Tag 450: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Substantiated investigations (state reports)
- September 19, 2024 · report HL365616662C
Details
Survey completed September 11, 2024: 2 correction orders
- Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure and contact information for the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care and Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and document review, the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure and contact information for the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care and Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving assisted living services, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”
- Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Two (2) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure six of seven employees reviewed unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-F, ULP-G, ULP-H, ULP-I, ULP-J) and registered nurse (RN)-K, had a background studies completed prior to starting employment and providing direct cares to residents.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure six of seven employees reviewed unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-F, ULP-G, ULP-H, ULP-I, ULP-J) and registered nurse (RN)-K, had a background studies completed prior to starting employment and providing direct cares to residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”
- Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one
- December 22, 2023 · report HL365612802C
Details
Survey completed December 22, 2023: 4 correction orders
- Tag 770: 144G.45 Subdivision 1 Minimum site Requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure public utilities are available and working, as required for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review, the licensee failed to ensure public utilities are available and working, as required for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “The following are required for all assisted living facilities: (1) public utilities must be available, and working or inspected and approved water and septic systems must be in place; (2) the location must be publicly accessible to fire department services [...]”
- Tag 1060: 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review the licensee failed to notify the required representatives, as required for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. [...]”
- Tag 1690: 144G.71 Subdivision 1 Medication management services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure security and accountability of controlled medications per the licensee policy of counting controlled medications on day and evening shift.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review, the licensee failed to ensure security and accountability of controlled medications per the licensee policy of counting controlled medications on day and evening shift. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and directly affected 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed who received controlled medications. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) This section applies only to assisted living facilities that provide medication management services. [...]”
- Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, observation, and document review the licensee failed to properly store and secure medications, as required for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R3, R4) reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”
- Tag 770: 144G.45 Subdivision 1 Minimum site Requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
- December 6, 2021 · report HL36561001M
Unsubstantiated investigations (1)
- October 29, 2025 · report HL365615045M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP) emotionally abused resident 1 and resident 2 when the AP swung a baseball bat around the facility and caused property destruction. Both resident 1 and resident 2 felt threatened, intimidated, and unsafe. In addition, the AP threatened to remove resident 1's cat from the facility which caused resident 1 emotional distress.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined emotional abuse was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: emotional abuse not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined emotional abuse was not substantiated. Although the AP was upset after resident 2 used racial slurs, placed an overarching tree branch outside over the patio door, and tied a noose around a baseball bat, the AP did not use the bat in a threatening way. In addition, there was no evidence of property destruction. Resident 1's cat was removed from the facility for sanitary concerns.”
Action taken by facility: “The facility nurse provided staff reeducation and return demonstration of medication administration documentation.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed October 14, 2025: no correction orders issued.
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 3 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee HEALING HOMES LIVING SERVICES
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility
- License number
- 425535
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2026-06-01
- Licensed capacity
- 3
- Licensee
- HEALING HOMES LIVING SERVICES
- County
- Ramsey County
- Administrator/Authorized Agent
- Chikio Richmond
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.3 mi, nursing home 1.3 mi, pharmacy 1.3 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Regions Hospital, Saint Paul. 1.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Capitol View Transitional Care Center, Saint Paul. 1.3 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Divine Healthcare Network, Saint Paul. 2.0 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walgreens. 1.3 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55117 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Fresenius Medical Care - Midway St Paul, Saint Paul, 1.0 mile away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
St Paul Capitol At Home, Saint Paul, 1.0 mile away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Davita St Paul Capitol Dialysis, Saint Paul, 1.0 mile away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 23 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55117.
Sholom Hospice, office in Saint Paul, 4.1 miles away, straight line
Our Lady Of Peace Hospice, office in Saint Paul, 4.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Presbyterian Homes Hospice Inc, office in Roseville, 4.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Fairview Health Services, Saint Paul. 3.3 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding very low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
- Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
- Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
- Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Healing Homes Living Services provide?
Healing Homes Living Services is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in St. Paul, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 3 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Healing Homes Living Services?
No. We publish state licensing details for Healing Homes Living Services but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Healing Homes Living Services cost?
Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Healing Homes Living Services does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Healing Homes Living Services?
Visit Healing Homes Living Services at 83 Cook Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55117.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid