Assisted Living

Garden Home Al

16612 Seymore Drive, Minnetonka, MN 55345 · Map
Licensed for 5 residents · GARDEN HOME AL LLC

State license active

Is this your community? Claim this listing

Garden Home Al is a state-licensed assisted living community in Minnetonka, Minnesota. It is licensed for 5 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered

5 residentsLicensed capacity

State licensedAssisted living facility

$2,500 to $4,400/moTypical assisted living start in Hennepin County, from 18 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

1Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Nov 18, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 5 residents

Assisted Living Facility 422868, current license dated Oct 31, 2025. Licensee GARDEN HOME AL LLC.

State inspection record1 substantiated

Last evaluation: November 18, 2025
Evaluations on record: 2
Investigations substantiated: 1 kept 7 years
Inconclusive: 0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated: 2 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (November 18, 2025, state report 2ZHU11)

MDH: “On November 17, 2025, through November 18, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider, and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed November 18, 2025: 9 correction orders

Tag 460: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a means for residents to request assistance for health and safety needs 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide a means for residents to request assistance for health and safety needs 24 hours a day, seven days a week. [...]”
Rule cited: “(5) provide a means for residents to request assistance for health and safety needs 24 hours per day, seven days per week; (6) allow residents the ability to furnish and decorate the resident's unit within the terms of the assisted living contract; (7) permit [...]”
Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”
Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review the licensee failed to maintain a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, pattern scope, scope/level letter H · correction period: Immediate
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with Minnesota Fire Code, Minnesota Rules 7511.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with Minnesota Fire Code, Minnesota Rules 7511. This practice resulted in a level three violation (a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, or a violation that had the potential to cause more than minimal harm to the resident), and was issued at a pattern scope (when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but [...]”
Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”
Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

Show all 9

Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”
Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”
Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing resident assessment and reassessment, not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last date of the assessment for two of two residents (R1, R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing resident assessment and reassessment, not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last date of the assessment for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”
Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management record with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management record with the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included

Earlier evaluations (1)

October 25, 2023: report 9DDE11 · 4 correction orders
Details
Survey completed January 30, 2024: 1 correction order
- Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the required annual and monthly maintenance on fire extinguishers.
  MDH’s finding, as written: “The licensee failed to provide the required annual and monthly maintenance on fire extinguishers. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
  Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”
Survey completed October 25, 2023: 3 correction orders
- Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the required annual and monthly maintenance on fire extinguishers.
  MDH’s finding, as written: “The licensee failed to provide the required annual and monthly maintenance on fire extinguishers. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
  Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”
- Tag 820: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (g) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, pattern scope, scope/level letter H · correction period: Immediate
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure physical facility elements did not constitute a distinct hazard to life.
  MDH’s finding, as written: “The licensee failed to ensure physical facility elements did not constitute a distinct hazard to life. The licensee failed to provide resident bedrooms with the minimum window opening meeting the minimum state standard for egress. This had the potential to directly affect all residents. [...]”
  Rule cited: “(g) Existing construction or elements, including assisted living facilities that were registered as housing with services establishments under chapter 144D prior to August 1, 2021, shall be permitted to continue in use provided such use does not constitute a [...]”
- Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: IMMEDIATE
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a background study (BGS) was submitted and a clearance received in affiliation with the assisted living licensee's current health facility identification 37567 for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A).
  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a background study (BGS) was submitted and a clearance received in affiliation with the assisted living licensee's current health facility identification 37567 for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A). [...]”
  Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

May 27, 2025 · report HL375674028C
Details
Survey completed May 8, 2025: 3 correction orders
- Tag 330: 144G.30 Subd. 4 Information provided by facility Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide clinical records and incident reports for three of four residents (R2, R4, R5) reviewed.
  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide clinical records and incident reports for three of four residents (R2, R4, R5) reviewed. [...]”
  Rule cited: “(a) The assisted living facility shall provide accurate and truthful information to the department during a survey, investigation, or other licensing activities. [...]”
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure they had an awake staff person 24 hours per day seven days per week, who was responsible for providing the health and safety needs of four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5) with records reviewed.
  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure they had an awake staff person 24 hours per day seven days per week, who was responsible for providing the health and safety needs of four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5) with records reviewed. [...]”
  Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”
- Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the individualized abuse prevention plans (IAPP) accurately reflected the resident's vulnerabilities, and failed to implement person centered, individualized interventions to minimize the risk of abuse/harm for three of four residents (R2, R3, R4,) with records reviewed.
  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the individualized abuse prevention plans (IAPP) accurately reflected the resident's vulnerabilities, and failed to implement person centered, individualized interventions to minimize the risk of abuse/harm for three of four residents (R2, R3, R4,) with records reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to cause serious injury. R2 had violent behavior which posed a risk of abuse to all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
  Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

Unsubstantiated investigations (2)

May 22, 2025 · report HL375672303M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP), an unknown facility staff member, sexually abused the resident when they raped her.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined sexual abuse was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: sexual abuse not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined sexual abuse was not substantiated. The resident made multiple allegations of rape against multiple individuals which were untrue. The resident had a significant mental health history which contributed to these allegations.”
Action taken by facility: “The facility placed functioning cameras in common areas and review video footage when allegations occur.”
Action taken by MDH: “The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”
Survey completed May 8, 2025: 3 correction orders
- Tag 330: 144G.30 Subd. 4 Information provided by facility Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide clinical records and incident reports for three of four residents (R2, R4, R5) reviewed.
  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide clinical records and incident reports for three of four residents (R2, R4, R5) reviewed. [...]”
  Rule cited: “(a) The assisted living facility shall provide accurate and truthful information to the department during a survey, investigation, or other licensing activities. [...]”
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure they had an awake staff person 24 hours per day seven days per week, who was responsible for providing the health and safety needs of four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5) with records reviewed.
  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure they had an awake staff person 24 hours per day seven days per week, who was responsible for providing the health and safety needs of four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5) with records reviewed. [...]”
  Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”
- Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the individualized abuse prevention plans (IAPP) accurately reflected the resident's vulnerabilities, and failed to implement person centered, individualized interventions to minimize the risk of abuse/harm for three of four residents (R2, R3, R4,) with records reviewed.
  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the individualized abuse prevention plans (IAPP) accurately reflected the resident's vulnerabilities, and failed to implement person centered, individualized interventions to minimize the risk of abuse/harm for three of four residents (R2, R3, R4,) with records reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to cause serious injury. R2 had violent behavior which posed a risk of abuse to all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
  Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”
May 22, 2025 · report HL375677822M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “Allegation # 1. The facility neglected a resident when they failed to provide wound care and pain management after the resident's leg was surgically amputated. Allegation # 2. The AP (unknown facility staff) sexually abused the resident when they placed their finger into the resident's anus.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined sexual abuse was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into 2 allegations and found: neglect not substantiated; sexual abuse not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “Allegation # 1. The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The facility discovered the resident's wound and coordinated medical care with his physician. Although the resident required an amputation (removal) of his leg, the facility provided pain medications and wound care. Allegation # 2. The Minnesota Department of Health determined sexual abuse was not substantiated. The resident was incontinent (no control) of bowel and required staff members to wash him after each incontinent episode.”
Action taken by facility: “The facility coordinated medical care for the resident.”
Action taken by MDH: “The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”
Survey completed May 8, 2025: 3 correction orders
- Tag 330: 144G.30 Subd. 4 Information provided by facility Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide clinical records and incident reports for three of four residents (R2, R4, R5) reviewed.
  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide clinical records and incident reports for three of four residents (R2, R4, R5) reviewed. [...]”
  Rule cited: “(a) The assisted living facility shall provide accurate and truthful information to the department during a survey, investigation, or other licensing activities. [...]”
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure they had an awake staff person 24 hours per day seven days per week, who was responsible for providing the health and safety needs of four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5) with records reviewed.
  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure they had an awake staff person 24 hours per day seven days per week, who was responsible for providing the health and safety needs of four of four residents (R2, R3, R4, R5) with records reviewed. [...]”
  Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”
- Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
  Details
  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the individualized abuse prevention plans (IAPP) accurately reflected the resident's vulnerabilities, and failed to implement person centered, individualized interventions to minimize the risk of abuse/harm for three of four residents (R2, R3, R4,) with records reviewed.
  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the individualized abuse prevention plans (IAPP) accurately reflected the resident's vulnerabilities, and failed to implement person centered, individualized interventions to minimize the risk of abuse/harm for three of four residents (R2, R3, R4,) with records reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to cause serious injury. R2 had violent behavior which posed a risk of abuse to all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
  Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee GARDEN HOME AL LLC

License type: Assisted Living Facility
License number: 422868
License status: Active
Current license dated: 2025-10-31
Licensed capacity: 5
Licensee: GARDEN HOME AL LLC
County: Hennepin County
Administrator/Authorized Agent: Fardowsa Gelle

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

The state recorded a finding in May 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
What fees are charged at move-in?

What we checked7 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

Source	Data as of	What we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records	Sep 28, 2026	See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases	Oct 15, 2026	Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016	Oct 15, 2026	Nothing on record
HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted	Jul 6, 2026	Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)	Sep 20, 2026	Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General Information	Aug 19, 2026	Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care Agencies	May 27, 2026	Nothing on record

Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask

What type of care does Garden Home Al provide?

Garden Home Al is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Minnetonka, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 5 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Garden Home Al?

No. We publish state licensing details for Garden Home Al but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Garden Home Al cost?

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Garden Home Al does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Garden Home Al?

Visit Garden Home Al at 16612 Seymore Drive, Minnetonka, MN 55345.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid

Other communities in Hennepin County

See all Assisted Living in Minnetonka →