Assisted Living
Five G Living Center
7007 Greenbriar Curve, Shakopee, MN 55379 · Map
Licensed for 5 residents · FIVE G LIVING CENTER LLC
Five G Living Center is a state-licensed assisted living community in Shakopee, Minnesota. It is licensed for 5 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 5 residents
Assisted Living Facility 425501, current license dated Jan 2, 2026. Licensee FIVE G LIVING CENTER LLC.
Nearest emergency room
3.7 miles
St Francis Regional Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Five G Living Center this community | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated | |
| Tender Care Providers | 1.0 mi | 4 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Sincere Care Shakopee | 1.2 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Huunocare | 1.6 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Martha House | 1.6 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
State inspection record0 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- December 20, 2023
- Evaluations on record
- 1
- Investigations substantiated
- 0 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 0 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 3 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (December 20, 2023, state report 32QV11)
MDH: “On December 19, 2023, through December 21, 2023, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a survey at the above provider, and the following correction orders are issued.”
Survey completed December 21, 2023: 13 correction orders
- Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a copy of the Uniform Disclosure of Assisted Living Service and Amenities (UDALSA) to one of one resident (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a copy of the Uniform Disclosure of Assisted Living Service and Amenities (UDALSA) to one of one resident (R1). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required staffing plan was posted as required, potentially affecting all of the licensee's current residents, staff, and visitors.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the required staffing plan was posted as required, potentially affecting all of the licensee's current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”
- Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post in a conspicuous place, information about the licensee's grievance procedure, the name, telephone number, and e-mail contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to post in a conspicuous place, information about the licensee's grievance procedure, the name, telephone number, and e-mail contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. This had the potential to affect staff, visitors and all residents receiving assisted living services. [...]”
Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”
- Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to engage in and maintain documentation of ongoing quality management activities relevant to the size and services provided by the assisted living provider.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to engage in and maintain documentation of ongoing quality management activities relevant to the size and services provided by the assisted living provider. [...]”
Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”
Show all 13
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to complete a written emergency disaster plan with all required content and failed to post the emergency plan prominently.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to complete a written emergency disaster plan with all required content and failed to post the emergency plan prominently. This had the potential to affect all current residents receiving services under the assisted living license, staff, and visitors to the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
- Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to perform the required monthly maintenance on fire extinguishers as required for the facility.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to perform the required monthly maintenance on fire extinguishers as required for the facility. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on the interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 1330: 144G.60 Subd. 4 (b) Unlicensed personnel Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to complete training and competency evaluations in all required training topics for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to complete training and competency evaluations in all required training topics for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B). [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Unlicensed personnel performing delegated nursing tasks in an assisted living facility must: (1) have successfully completed training and demonstrated competency by successfully completing a written or oral test of the topics in section 144G.61, [...]”
- Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services at least annually for one of one resident (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services at least annually for one of one resident (R1). [...]”
Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”
- Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management record with the required content for one of one resident (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management record with the required content for one of one resident (R1). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”
- Tag 1820: 144G.71 Subd. 13 Prescriptions Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of one resident (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of one resident (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or [...]”
Rule cited: “There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident.”
- Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide documentation in the resident's record regarding the disposition of medication to include the medication strength, prescription number, quantity, date of disposition, and names of staff and other individuals involved in the disposition for one of one deceased resident (R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide documentation in the resident's record regarding the disposition of medication to include the medication strength, prescription number, quantity, date of disposition, and names of staff and other individuals involved in the disposition for one of one deceased resident (R2). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”
From MDH’s letter: MDH granted the assisted living license; no immediate fines.
Unsubstantiated investigations (3)
- November 7, 2024 · report HL396675061M · MDH finding: Inconclusive
Details
Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator abused the resident when the alleged perpetrator locked the door to the resident's room secluding the resident in her room.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was inconclusive.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: abuse inconclusive.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was inconclusive. While the resident's door was locked and needed to be unlocked it is not evident if the resident or staff had locked the door.”
Action taken by facility: “No action taken.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed October 10, 2024: no correction orders issued.
- November 7, 2024 · report HL396675202M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility failed to ensure the resident was free from neglect when care planned services including medication administration and personal hygiene were not consistently provided to the resident leading to multiple hospitalizations.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. Although, the resident of the facility, the facility was unable to complete services daily due to the resident absences.”
Action taken by facility: “No action required.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed October 10, 2024: no correction orders issued.
- July 30, 2024 · report HL396673461M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP) abused the resident when she held the resident down and physically restrained the resident.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: abuse not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was not substantiated. The resident exhibited escalating threatening behaviors that were a danger to the resident and others. When de-escalation techniques were ineffective, the AP brought the resident to a chair and held her arms until law enforcement arrived. The incident does not rise to the level of abuse.”
Action taken by facility: “The facility continued to work with the resident, her family, and her providers to develop an effective program of behavior management.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed June 26, 2024: no correction orders issued.
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee FIVE G LIVING CENTER LLC
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility
- License number
- 425501
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2026-01-02
- Licensed capacity
- 5
- Licensee
- FIVE G LIVING CENTER LLC
- County
- Scott County
- Administrator/Authorized Agent
- Gute Gessisa
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.7 mi, nursing home 3.4 mi, pharmacy 3.4 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- St Francis Regional Medical Center, Shakopee. 3.7 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- St Gertrudes Health & Rehabilitation Center, Shakopee. 3.4 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Community Home Health Inc, Savage. 3.7 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walgreens. 3.4 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55379 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Fms Dialysis - Shakopee, Shakopee, 3.6 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Scott County Dialysis, Savage, 3.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Eden Prairie Dialysis, Eden Prairie, 5.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 22 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55379.
Caretenders Hospice, office in Minneapolis, 6.6 miles away, straight line
Minnesota Hospice LLC, office in Lakeville, 9.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars)
Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, office in Saint Louis Park, 11.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Park Nicollet Clinic, Bloomington. 4.9 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively high, wildfire relatively low, tornado very high, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
- Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
- Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
- Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Five G Living Center provide?
Five G Living Center is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Shakopee, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 5 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Five G Living Center?
No. We publish state licensing details for Five G Living Center but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Five G Living Center cost?
Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Five G Living Center does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Five G Living Center?
Visit Five G Living Center at 7007 Greenbriar Curve, Shakopee, MN 55379.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid