Assisted Living
First Light Residential Care L
6338 Girard Avenue S, Richfield, MN 55423 · Map
Licensed for 5 residents · FIRST LIGHT RESIDENTIAL CARE
First Light Residential Care L is a state-licensed assisted living community in Richfield, Minnesota. It is licensed for 5 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 5 residents
Assisted Living Facility 421859, current license dated Aug 11, 2025. Licensee FIRST LIGHT RESIDENTIAL CARE.
Nearest emergency room
1.5 miles
M Health Fairview Southdale Hospital, rated 5 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Light Residential Care L this community | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated | |
| Magnanimous Living, Dupont Ave S | 0.2 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Applewood Home Health Care, Irving Avenue South | 0.2 mi | 4 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Magnanimous Living, Mildred Drive | 0.3 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Oasis Home Health Care | 0.4 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
State inspection record0 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- February 20, 2026
- Evaluations on record
- 1
- Investigations substantiated
- 0 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 0 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 1 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (February 20, 2026, state report CK1311)
MDH: “On February 17, 2026, through February 20, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider, and the following correction orders are issued.”
Survey completed February 20, 2026: 9 correction orders
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Immediate · fine: $1,000.00 potential
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet the needs of one of two residents (R1) who required two-person assistance with transfers, mobility, and activities of daily living.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet the needs of one of two residents (R1) who required two-person assistance with transfers, mobility, and activities of daily living. [...]”
Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”
- Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records included evidence for a competency for appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records included evidence for a competency for appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A). The licensee also failed to ensure employee records included evidence for unplanned time away medication training for one of two employees (ULP-B). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 1330: 144G.60 Subd. 4 (b) Unlicensed personnel Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training was completed in all required areas for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, ULP-B).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training was completed in all required areas for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-A, ULP-B). [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Unlicensed personnel performing delegated nursing tasks in an assisted living facility must: (1) have successfully completed training and demonstrated competency by successfully completing a written or oral test of the topics in section 144G.61, [...]”
Show all 9
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a 14-day assessment and ongoing resident assessment and reassessment, not to exceed 14 calendar days from the date of admission and 90 calendar days from the last date of the assessment for two of two residents (R1, R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a 14-day assessment and ongoing resident assessment and reassessment, not to exceed 14 calendar days from the date of admission and 90 calendar days from the last date of the assessment for two of two residents (R1, R2). The licensee also failed to ensure the resident assessment was accurate for one of one resident (R1). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”
- Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7)
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to revise the service plan to ensure it included all services to be provided for one of two residents (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to revise the service plan to ensure it included all services to be provided for one of two residents (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are [...]”
Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”
- Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement a current treatment or therapy management plan to include all required content for one of two residents (R1) with a treatment ordered. [...]”
Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”
- Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure treatments were performed as ordered for one of two residents (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure treatments were performed as ordered for one of two residents (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a [...]”
Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”
MDH letters in this report
- June 10, 2026: Notice Of Removal Of Provisional Conditional License - License Granted
- April 15, 2026: Notice Of Provisional Extension And Conditional License
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is not in substantial compliance; MDH granted the assisted living license; no immediate fines.
Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): No orders were issued for this inspection report.
Potential fines listed by MDH (not assessed at this time)
- Tag 470 (144g.41 Subdivision 1 - Minimum Requirements), letter G: $1,000.00
Total potential fines, as printed in the letter: $1,000.00.
Unsubstantiated investigations (1)
- July 16, 2026 · report HL421651980M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when the resident had a change in condition and failed to follow the provider orders.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The resident had arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (occurs when cholesterol and fatty deposits form plaque inside your arteries, narrowing them and restricting blood flow) and a history of edema in his legs. The provider ordered medication and compression wraps, however the resident refused to wear the compression wraps because they hurt his legs. The provider was aware the resident refused the wraps; occupational therapy was ordered and the edema decreased.”
Action taken by facility: “No action required.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed July 7, 2026: no correction orders issued.
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee FIRST LIGHT RESIDENTIAL CARE
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility
- License number
- 421859
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2025-08-11
- Licensed capacity
- 5
- Licensee
- FIRST LIGHT RESIDENTIAL CARE
- County
- Hennepin County
- Administrator/Authorized Agent
- Sofia Mohamed
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.5 mi, nursing home 1.1 mi, pharmacy 0.7 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- M Health Fairview Southdale Hospital, Edina. 1.5 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 5 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Edenbrook of Edina, Minneapolis. 1.1 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Almost Family, Edina. 3.1 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- CVS Pharmacy. 0.7 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55423 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Davita Richfield Dialysis, Richfield, 0.6 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Fmc - Southtown Dialysis, Bloomington, 2.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fmc Dialysis - South Minneapolis, Minneapolis, 2.7 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 28 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55423.
Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital, office in Saint Louis Park, 3.8 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Healthpartners Hospice And Palliatice Care, office in Bloomington, 4.2 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Brighton Hospice, office in Saint Louis Park, 4.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Hennepin Healthcare System Inc, Richfield. 0.5 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
- Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
- Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
- Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does First Light Residential Care L provide?
First Light Residential Care L is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Richfield, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 5 residents.
Does Lilisity rate First Light Residential Care L?
No. We publish state licensing details for First Light Residential Care L but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does First Light Residential Care L cost?
Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. First Light Residential Care L does not publish its prices.
How do I contact First Light Residential Care L?
Visit First Light Residential Care L at 6338 Girard Avenue S, Richfield, MN 55423.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid