Fantum Home Health Care, France Avenue North

Last evaluation

February 27, 2026

Evaluations on record

2

Investigations substantiated

1 kept 7 years

Inconclusive

1 kept 4 years

Unsubstantiated

0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (February 27, 2026, state report 0FZU11)

MDH: “On February 23, 2026, through February 27, 2026, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed February 27, 2026: 9 correction orders

• Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

  Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

• Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee tuberculosis (TB) testing with a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) or blood test was completed and documented for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B).

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee tuberculosis (TB) testing with a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST) or blood test was completed and documented for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B). [...]”

  Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

• Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) Days · fine: $500.00 assessed
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

  Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”

• Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) Days · fine: $500.00 assessed
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

  Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

• Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty One (21) Days
  Details

  Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G.

  MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was maintained in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statute 144G. [...]”

  Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included

Fines assessed by MDH

• Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd. 2. (a) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $500.00
• Tag 780 (144g.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $500.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $1,000.00.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

• March 26, 2026 · report HL398516762M · MDH finding: Substantiated, facility and individual responsibility
  Details

  Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when they failed to have adequate supervision and interventions in place for the resident's behaviors. As a result, the resident's behaviors escalated, and the resident hospitalized.”

  “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated.”

  “The facility and AP were responsible for the maltreatment.”

  Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect substantiated (facility and individual responsibility).

  MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The facility and AP were responsible for the maltreatment. The AP was notified of the resident's mental health incidents by unlicensed personnel (ULP). The AP failed to notify the licensed nurse of all the resident's incidents occurring in real time and provided the nurse only summaries after the resident's behavior escalated to the point requiring transfer to the emergency room. As a result, the resident did not receive a nurse reassessment of his vulnerabilities and/or behaviors to determine if interventions were effective or appropriate, and lacked any new interventions to reduce the risk of the resident endangering himself or others.”

  Action taken by facility: “At times during behavior escalation, the facility staff called COPE and 911.”

  Action taken by MDH: “The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”

  Survey completed January 21, 2026: 4 correction orders

  • Tag 330: 144G.30 Subd. 4 Information provided by facility Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide accurate and truthful information surrounding the death of one of one resident (R2) to Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) with records reviewed.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide accurate and truthful information surrounding the death of one of one resident (R2) to Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) with records reviewed. The licensee reported a staff member heard a loud sound, responded, found R2 unresponsive on the floor, called 911, and started CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The assisted living facility shall provide accurate and truthful information to the department during a survey, investigation, or other licensing activities. [...]”

  • Tag 450: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 4, pattern scope, scope/level letter K · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee staff failed to provide person centered services, non-nursing staff provided care planning and coordination with medical providers outside of their scope of practice, failed to update the registered nurse (RN) on resident incidents and behaviors and the RN failed provide appropriate supervision of delegated tasks by reviewing progress notes, assessing after hospitalizations and implementing specific interventions for substance abuse for two of two residents (R1, R2) reviewed.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee staff failed to provide person centered services, non-nursing staff provided care planning and coordination with medical providers outside of their scope of practice, failed to update the registered nurse (RN) on resident incidents and behaviors and the RN failed provide appropriate supervision of delegated tasks by reviewing progress notes, assessing after hospitalizations and implementing specific interventions for substance abuse for two of [...]”

    Rule cited: “All assisted living facilities shall: (1) distribute to residents the assisted living bill of rights; (2) provide services in a manner that complies with the Nurse Practice Act in sections 148.171 to 148.285; (3) utilize a person-centered planning and service [...]”

  • Tag 1690: 144G.71 Subdivision 1 Medication management services Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to implement medication management policies and procedures with orderly medications timely and address medication omissions with the rationale as "out of stock" for one of one resident (R2) reviewed.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to implement medication management policies and procedures with orderly medications timely and address medication omissions with the rationale as "out of stock" for one of one resident (R2) reviewed. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) This section applies only to assisted living facilities that provide medication management services. [...]”

  • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of two resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of two resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, the facility and an individual person were responsible for the maltreatment in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment reports for details.”

    Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.