Lilisity

Assisted Living

Falls Landing Assisted Living

1101 North Hiawatha Avenue, Pipestone, MN 56164 · Map
Licensed for 28 residents · FALLS LANDING ASSISTED LIVING

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Falls Landing Assisted Living is a state-licensed assisted living community in Pipestone, Minnesota. It is licensed for 28 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
28 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Apr 3, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 28 residents

Assisted Living Facility 425892, current license dated Aug 1, 2026. Licensee FALLS LANDING ASSISTED LIVING.

Nearest emergency room

1.5 miles

Pipestone County Medical Center.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Falls Landing Assisted Living this community28Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Good Samaritan Society Pipesto1.4 mi55$2,194/moActive0 substantiated
Oasis Care Home24.4 mi6Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Good Samaritan Society Luverne25.3 mi30$1,984/moActive0 substantiated
Lakeview Senior Housing27.4 mi18Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
April 3, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (April 3, 2025, state report TEM611)

MDH: “On April 1, 2025, through April 3, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider.”

Survey completed April 3, 2025: 5 correction orders

  • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control with proper hand hygiene for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, licensed assisted living director (LALD)-A).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control with proper hand hygiene for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, licensed assisted living director (LALD)-A). This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

  • Tag 1060: 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a written notice with all the required content to the resident, legal representative, and designated representative, for an emergency relocation for one of one resident (R3).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a written notice with all the required content to the resident, legal representative, and designated representative, for an emergency relocation for one of one resident (R3). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. [...]”

  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive assessment including all required information in the Uniform Assessment Tool for one of one resident (R1) every 90 days as required.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive assessment including all required information in the Uniform Assessment Tool for one of one resident (R1) every 90 days as required. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

  • Tag 1750: 144G.71 Subd. 7 Delegation of medication administration Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident record specified, in writing, specific instructions for diclofenac gel (pain relief) for one of two residents (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident record specified, in writing, specific instructions for diclofenac gel (pain relief) for one of two residents (R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “When administration of medications is delegated to unlicensed personnel, the assisted living facility must ensure that the registered nurse has: (1) instructed the unlicensed personnel in the proper methods to administer the medications, and the unlicensed [...]”

  • Tag 2320: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (b) Appropriate care and services Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, licensee failed to ensure medications were administered according to policy and accepted standards of practice for two of two residents (R5, R1) with insulin, one of one resident (R2) with diclofenac gel, and one of one resident with an inhaler (R4). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Residents have the right to receive health care and other assisted living services with continuity from people who are properly trained and competent to perform their duties and in sufficient numbers to adequately provide the services agreed to in the [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 510 (144g.41 Subd. 3 - Infection Control Program): $500.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • June 10, 2022: report ZQBT11 · 29 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed June 10, 2022: 29 correction orders

    • Tag 250: 144G.20 Subdivision 1 Conditions Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to show they met the requirements of licensure, by attesting the managerial officials who oversaw the day-to-day operations understood applicable statutes and rules; nor developed and/or implemented current policies and procedures as required with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to show they met the requirements of licensure, by attesting the managerial officials who oversaw the day-to-day operations understood applicable statutes and rules; nor developed and/or implemented current policies and procedures as required with records reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The commissioner may refuse to grant a provisional license, refuse to grant a license as a result of a change in ownership, refuse to renew a license, suspend or revoke a license, or impose a conditional license if the owner, controlling individual, or [...]”

    • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required staffing plan was developed as required, potentially affecting the licensee's residents, staff, and any visitors of the licensee.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the required staffing plan was developed as required, potentially affecting the licensee's residents, staff, and any visitors of the licensee. In addition, the facility failed to post a staffing schedule daily in a central location, that was accessible to staff, residents, volunteers, and the public. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This had the potential to affect all 17 residents residing at the facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control related to COVID-19, when they did not comply with

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control related to COVID-19, when they did not comply with MDH guidance for COVID-19 related to wearing appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment). Staff failed to screen for COVID-19 when entering the building for their shift. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

    • Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to implement and maintain a quality management program appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to implement and maintain a quality management program appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”

    Show all 29
    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C and ULP-D, and registered nurse (RN)-B reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C and ULP-D, and registered nurse (RN)-B reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included documentation of a completed health history and symptom screening, including completion of a two-step TST (tuberculin skin test) or other evidence of TB screening such as a blood test for one of three employees (registered nurse (RN)-B) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included documentation of a completed health history and symptom screening, including completion of a two-step TST (tuberculin skin test) or other evidence of TB screening such as a blood test for one of three employees (registered nurse (RN)-B) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

    • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and have available a written emergency disaster plan with all required content outlined in Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and have available a written emergency disaster plan with all required content outlined in Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

    • Tag 700: 144G.43 Subdivision 1 Resident record Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure resident records were protected against unauthorized disclosure of both electronic and written records.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure resident records were protected against unauthorized disclosure of both electronic and written records. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Resident records, whether written or electronic, must be protected against loss, tampering, or unauthorized disclosure in compliance with chapter 13 and other applicable relevant federal and state laws. [...]”

    • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed provide smoke alarms in all sleeping rooms throughout the facility.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed provide smoke alarms in all sleeping rooms throughout the facility. This deficient condition had the ability to affect all staff and residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a fire safety and evacuation plan with required elements.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on a record review and interview, the licensee failed to develop a fire safety and evacuation plan with required elements. This had the potential to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (a) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C and ULP-D) completed training and competency evaluations in all required training topics.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C and ULP-D) completed training and competency evaluations in all required training topics. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”

    • Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C and ULP-D completed training and competency evaluations in all required training topics.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C and ULP-D completed training and competency evaluations in all required training topics. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”

    • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted direct

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing delegated nursing or therapy tasks within 30 days of first providing those services for one of two unlicensed personnel (ULP)-F with employee records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

    • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure orientation to assisted living facility statutes included all the required content for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D, and registered nurse (RN)-B) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure orientation to assisted living facility statutes included all the required content for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D, and registered nurse (RN)-B) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

    • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D and registered nurse (RN)-B) received the required amount of dementia care training, in the required time frame in accordance with 144G.64 with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C, ULP-D and registered nurse (RN)-B) received the required amount of dementia care training, in the required time frame in accordance with 144G.64 with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure ongoing comprehensive assessments were completed timely for six of six residents (R5, R4, R6, R7, R8 and R2), and failed to complete a change in condition assessment was for one of one resident (R2) with record

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure ongoing comprehensive assessments were completed timely for six of six residents (R5, R4, R6, R7, R8 and R2), and failed to complete a change in condition assessment was for one of one resident (R2) with record reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

    • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for two of three residents (R4, R5) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for two of three residents (R4, R5) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

    • Tag 1700: 144G.71 Subd. 2 Provision of medication management services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a medication assessment for three of three residents (R2, R5, and R7) that included interventions needed in management of medications to prevent diversion of medication by the resident or others who may have access to the medications and provide instructions to the resident and legal or designated representatives on interventions to manage the resident's medications to prevent diversion of medications.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review, the licensee failed to have a medication assessment for three of three residents (R2, R5, and R7) that included interventions needed in management of medications to prevent diversion of medication by the resident or others who may have access to the medications and provide instructions to the resident and legal or designated representatives on interventions to manage the resident's medications to prevent diversion of medications. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident who requests medication management services, the facility shall, prior to providing medication management services, have a registered nurse, licensed health professional, or authorized prescriber under section 151.37 conduct an [...]”

    • Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed annual medication re-assessments for one of two residents (R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed annual medication re-assessments for one of two residents (R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”

    • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management record with the required content for three of three residents (R2, R5, and R6) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop an individualized medication management record with the required content for three of three residents (R2, R5, and R6) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

    • Tag 1750: 144G.71 Subd. 7 Delegation of medication administration Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP-C) completed training and competency evaluations in all required training topics.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure one of one unlicensed personnel (ULP-C) completed training and competency evaluations in all required training topics. This resulted in an immediate order issued on July 15, 2022, at approximately 1:40 p.m. [...]”

      Rule cited: “When administration of medications is delegated to unlicensed personnel, the assisted living facility must ensure that the registered nurse has: (1) instructed the unlicensed personnel in the proper methods to administer the medications, and the unlicensed [...]”

    • Tag 1830: 144G.71 Subd. 14 Renewal of prescriptions Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to renew prescriptions at least every 12 months for three of three residents (R2, R4, and R7) with record reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to renew prescriptions at least every 12 months for three of three residents (R2, R4, and R7) with record reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Prescriptions must be renewed at least every 12 months or more frequently as indicated by the assessment in subdivision 2. Prescriptions for controlled substances must comply with chapter 152.”

    • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure time sensitive medications were dated when opened and had a pharmacy label for two of two residents (R2 and R3) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure time sensitive medications were dated when opened and had a pharmacy label for two of two residents (R2 and R3) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

    • Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed upon disposition, document in the resident's record the disposition of the medication including the medication's prescription number as applicable for one of one discharged resident (R9) with record review.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed upon disposition, document in the resident's record the disposition of the medication including the medication's prescription number as applicable for one of one discharged resident (R9) with record review. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”

    • Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and implement a treatment or therapy management record to include all required content for five of five residents (R2, R4, R5, R6, and R8) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and implement a treatment or therapy management record to include all required content for five of five residents (R2, R4, R5, R6, and R8) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”

    • Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure unlicensed personnel were trained and demonstrated competency in treatments to a registered nurse

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure unlicensed personnel were trained and demonstrated competency in treatments to a registered nurse (RN) for three of three unlicensed personnel (ULP-C, ULP-D and ULP-E) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

    • Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a written prescriber's order for a treatment was obtained for two of five residents (R2 and R6) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a written prescriber's order for a treatment was obtained for two of five residents (R2 and R6) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”

    • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 Appropriate care and services Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: IMMEDIATE
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident (R2) with bilateral half siderails, with record reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards for one of one resident (R2) with bilateral half siderails, with record reviewed. This resulted in an immediate correction order on June 6, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

    From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 28 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee FALLS LANDING ASSISTED LIVING
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
425892
License status
Active
Current license dated
2026-08-01
Licensed capacity
28
Licensee
FALLS LANDING ASSISTED LIVING
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Jennifer Currier

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.5 mi, nursing home 0.7 mi, pharmacy 14.0 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Pipestone County Medical Center, Pipestone. 1.5 miles away, straight line.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Good Samaritan Society - Pipestone, Pipestone. 0.7 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Avera@Home Pipestone, Pipestone. 1.5 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Lewis Drug. 14.0 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 56164 as rural (rural area).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Pipestone Dialysis, Pipestone, 1.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
7 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 56164.
Avera@Home Pipestone, office in Pipestone, 1.5 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Hutchinson Health, Hutchinson. 112.9 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; in FEMA's high-risk flood area (Zone AE)

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Zone AE: 1% annual chance flood area (high risk); base flood elevation set. This is inside FEMA's Special Flood Hazard Area, where flood insurance is required for federally backed mortgages. (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding very low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively moderate, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. This address is in FEMA's high-risk flood area. Where do residents go in an evacuation, and how do you move them?
  2. The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  3. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  4. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  5. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  6. What fees are charged at move-in?
  7. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  8. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  9. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  10. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Falls Landing Assisted Living provide?

Falls Landing Assisted Living is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Pipestone, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 28 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Falls Landing Assisted Living?

No. We publish state licensing details for Falls Landing Assisted Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Falls Landing Assisted Living cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Falls Landing Assisted Living does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Falls Landing Assisted Living?

Visit Falls Landing Assisted Living at 1101 North Hiawatha Avenue, Pipestone, MN 56164.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid