Assisted Living and Memory Care
Diamond Willow Assisted Living
6353 East Superior Street, Duluth, MN 55804 · Map
Licensed for 26 residents · DIAMOND WILLOW ASSISTED LIVING
Diamond Willow Assisted Living is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Duluth, Minnesota. It is licensed for 26 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 26 residents
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 423836, current license dated Jan 1, 2026. Licensee DIAMOND WILLOW ASSISTED LIVING.
Nearest emergency room
5.1 miles
St Lukes Hospital, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diamond Willow Assisted Living this community | 26 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated | |
| Lakeside Manor | 1.4 mi | 40 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Ecumen Duluth the Shores | 2.3 mi | 70 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated |
| Pines III Assisted Living | 3.6 mi | 61 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Anne's Place | 4.6 mi | 3 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
State inspection record1 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- September 11, 2025
- Evaluations on record
- 2
- Investigations substantiated
- 1 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 0 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 0 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (September 11, 2025, state report TG3B11)
MDH: “On September 9, 2025, through September 11, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”
Survey completed September 11, 2025: 5 correction orders
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”
- Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D) during feeding assistance and three of three employees (ULP-E, ULP-F, ULP-G) during personal cares.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D) during feeding assistance and three of three employees (ULP-E, ULP-F, ULP-G) during personal cares. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”
- Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Code. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 1880: 144G.71 Subd. 19 Storage of medications Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure refrigerated
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure refrigerated medications were maintained at manufacturer recommended temperatures by failing to monitor and document medication refrigerator temperatures for two of two medication refrigerators. [...]”
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility must store all prescription medications in securely locked and substantially constructed compartments according to the manufacturer's directions and permit only authorized personnel to have access.”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.
Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): No orders were issued for this inspection report.
Fines assessed by MDH
- Tag 510 (144g.41 Subd.3 - Infection Control Program): $500.00
- Tag 775 (144g.45 Subd.2. (a) - Fire Protection And PhysicalEnvironment): $500.00
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $1,000.00.
Earlier evaluations (1)
- October 14, 2021: report RE9011 · 15 correction orders
Details
Survey completed January 18, 2022: 4 correction orders
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action is required.”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records (re-issued) Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained all required content for three of four unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-D, ULP-E and ULP-F) with employee records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained all required content for three of four unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-D, ULP-E and ULP-F) with employee records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required (re-issued) Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and execute a written contract, prior to the start of services, with the required content to provide assisted living services for one of five residents (R4) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and execute a written contract, prior to the start of services, with the required content to provide assisted living services for one of five residents (R4) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring (re-issued) Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse completed a follow-up assessment within 14 days of start of services two of five residents (R1, R3) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse completed a follow-up assessment within 14 days of start of services two of five residents (R1, R3) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”
Survey completed October 14, 2021: 11 correction orders
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop, implement or post in the facility a staffing plan to meet the needs of all residents.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop, implement or post in the facility a staffing plan to meet the needs of all residents. This had the potential to affect all 21 current residents, staff and visitors of the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This had the potential to affect all 21 current residents residing at the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”
- Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · fine: $500.00 assessed
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure infection control standards were followed during medication administration for two of four residents (R4, R3) observed during a medication pass.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure infection control standards were followed during medication administration for two of four residents (R4, R3) observed during a medication pass. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”
- Tag 570: 144G.42 Subdivision 1 Display of license Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to display its current assisted living license in the main entrance of the
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and document review, the licensee failed to display its current assisted living license in the main entrance of the facility. This had the potential to affect all 21 current residents, staff, and visitors to the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “The original current license must be displayed at the main entrance of each assisted living facility. The facility must provide a copy of the license to any person who requests it.”
- Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to engage in and maintain documentation of quality management activities, commensurate with the size of the business.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review, the licensee failed to engage in and maintain documentation of quality management activities, commensurate with the size of the business. This had the potential to affect all 21 current residents, staff and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”
Show all 11
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained all required content for two of four unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-A and ULP-B) with employee records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained all required content for two of four unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-A and ULP-B) with employee records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content and failed to post an emergency preparedness plan prominently.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and document review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content and failed to post an emergency preparedness plan prominently. This had the potential to affect all 21 current residents in the facility, staff and any visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
- Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and execute
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and execute a written contract, prior to the start of services, with the required content to provided assisted living services for one of five residents (R5) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”
- Tag 1610: 144G.70 Subd. 2 Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse completed an initial, comprehensive nursing assessment prior to signing of assisted living contract or providing
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse completed an initial, comprehensive nursing assessment prior to signing of assisted living contract or providing services for one of four residents (R5) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse completed a follow-up assessment within 14 days of start of services for two of five residents (R5, R1) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse completed a follow-up assessment within 14 days of start of services for two of five residents (R5, R1) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”
- Tag 3090: 144.6502, Subd. 8 Notice to Visitors Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a required notice was posted at the main entry way of the facility to display statutory language to disclose electronic monitoring activity.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and document review, the licensee failed to ensure a required notice was posted at the main entry way of the facility to display statutory language to disclose electronic monitoring activity. This had the potential to affect the 21 current residents, staff and any visitors to the facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “Subd. 8.Notice to visitors. (a) A facility must post a sign at each facility entrance accessible to visitors that states: "Electronic monitoring devices, including security cameras and audio devices, may be present to record persons and activities." (b) The [...]”
Fines assessed by MDH
- Tag 510 (144g.41 Subd. 3 - Infection Control Program): $500.00
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements (re-issued) scope/level letter F
Substantiated investigations (state reports)
- November 21, 2023 · report HL285457007M · MDH finding: Substantiated, facility responsibility
Details
Allegation, as written: “A facility staff member/alleged perpetrator (AP) sexually abused the resident by inappropriately touching her on more than one occasion, causing bruising of the thighs and vagina. In addition, the facility neglected the resident when facility staff failed to assess, investigate, and implement new interventions when multiple occurrences of inner thigh bruising were observed on the resident.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was inconclusive.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated.”
“The facility was responsible for the maltreatment.”
Summary: MDH looked into 2 allegations and found: abuse inconclusive; neglect substantiated (facility responsibility).
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was inconclusive. Due to incomplete and conflicting accounts, the cause of the bruising was not able to be determined, and an alleged perpetrator (AP) was not able to be identified. The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The facility was responsible for the maltreatment. Inner thigh bruising was observed on the resident on three separate occasions over a fifteen-week period. Neglect occurred when the facility failed to act on their awareness and knowledge of the multiple occurrences of unexplained bruising and An equal opportunity employer. failed to develop and/or implement new interventions to protect the resident's health and safety.”
Action taken by facility: “The facility conducted an internal investigation into the allegations of sexual abuse.”
Action taken by MDH: “The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”
Survey completed October 11, 2023: 1 correction order
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one resident reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.
MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one resident reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, the facility was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”
Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 26 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee DIAMOND WILLOW ASSISTED LIVING
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
- License number
- 423836
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2026-01-01
- Licensed capacity
- 26
- Licensee
- DIAMOND WILLOW ASSISTED LIVING
- County
- Saint Louis County
- Administrator/Authorized Agent
- Dana Dallum
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 5.1 mi, nursing home 2.3 mi, pharmacy 3.8 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- St Lukes Hospital, Duluth. 5.1 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Ecumen Lakeshore, Duluth. 2.3 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Ecumen Home Care Lakeshore, Duluth. 2.3 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Falks Pharmacy. 3.8 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55804 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Fmc Dialysis Services Of Spirit Valley, Duluth, 10.1 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fresenius Kidney Care Miller Hill, Hermantown, 10.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 7 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55804.
Aspirus St. Luke'S At Home-Hospice-Duluth, office in Duluth, 5.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Essentia Health St Mary'S Hospice & Palliative Care Services, office in Duluth, 5.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Caringedge Hospice Hermantown, office in Hermantown, 8.9 miles away, straight line - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Polinsky Medical Rehabilitation Center, Duluth. 10.4 miles away, straight line. 3 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, coastal flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
- What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
- How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | Could not read the site |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Diamond Willow Assisted Living provide?
Diamond Willow Assisted Living is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Duluth, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 26 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Diamond Willow Assisted Living?
No. We publish state licensing details for Diamond Willow Assisted Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Diamond Willow Assisted Living cost?
Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Diamond Willow Assisted Living does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Diamond Willow Assisted Living?
Use Diamond Willow Assisted Living's website, diamondwillow.com, or visit at 6353 East Superior Street, Duluth, MN 55804.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid