Assisted Living
Cozy Baraka Home Care, Boone Avenue North
3554 Boone Avenue North, New Hope, MN 55427 · Map
Licensed for 4 residents · COZY BARAKA HOME CARE INC.
Cozy Baraka Home Care, Boone Avenue North is a state-licensed assisted living community in New Hope, Minnesota. It is licensed for 4 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 4 residents
Assisted Living Facility 425708, current license dated May 25, 2026. Licensee COZY BARAKA HOME CARE INC..
Nearest emergency room
2.5 miles
North Memorial Health Hospital, rated 1 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cozy Baraka Home Care, Boone Avenue North this community | 4 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated | |
| Alltracare | 0.2 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Smc Ashton, Boone Avenue North | 0.3 mi | 4 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated |
| Wholesome Senior Living | 0.4 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Totalcare Assisted Living Serv | 0.5 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
State inspection record1 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- August 13, 2025
- Evaluations on record
- 2
- Investigations substantiated
- 1 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 1 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 0 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (August 13, 2025, state report EEN111)
MDH: “On August 12, 2025, through August 13, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”
Survey completed August 13, 2025: 5 correction orders
- Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days · fine: $500.00 assessed
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program that complied with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an infection control program that complied with accepted health care, medical and nursing standards for infection control. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, employees, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”
- Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post information directing individuals to the Office of Health Facility Complaints (OHFC) at the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) if they had complaints about the facility or person providing services.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to post information directing individuals to the Office of Health Facility Complaints (OHFC) at the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) if they had complaints about the facility or person providing services. [...]”
Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and email contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”
- Tag 775: 144G.45 Subd. 2. (a) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain facility in compliance with Minnesota State Fire Code under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain facility in compliance with Minnesota State Fire Code under Minnesota Rules Chapter 7511. This had the potential to affect some residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and:”
- Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Immediate · fine: $1,000.00 assessed
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure they received a background study (BGS) clearance
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure they received a background study (BGS) clearance from NETStudy 2.0 (web-based system use to submit BGS requests to the Department of Human Services (DHS)) in affiliation with the assisted living licensee's health facility identification number (HFID) for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B) with a COVID-19 expired BGS. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”
- Tag 1530: 144G.64 (a) (1-2) Training in Dementia, Mental Illness, and De- Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure two hours of initial mental illness and de-escalation training was conducted within 160 hours of providing direct care to residents for two of two direct care staff (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-C).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure two hours of initial mental illness and de-escalation training was conducted within 160 hours of providing direct care to residents for two of two direct care staff (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-C). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following dementia care, mental illness, and de-escalation training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on dementia topics specified under [...]”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.
Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included
Fines assessed by MDH
- Tag 510 (144g.41 Subd.3 - Infection Control Program): $500.00
- Tag 1290 (144g.60 Subdivision1 - BackgroundStudiesRequired): $1,000.00
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $1,500.00.
Earlier evaluations (1)
- April 5, 2023: report EWKU11 · 13 correction orders
Details
Survey completed April 5, 2023: 13 correction orders
- Tag 490: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (ii)-(vii) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a daily program of social and recreational activities based on individual and group interests, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs, that create opportunities for active participation in the community at large.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to have a daily program of social and recreational activities based on individual and group interests, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs, that create opportunities for active participation in the community at large. This had the potential to affect all the residents of the licensee. [...]”
Rule cited: “(iv) upon the request of the resident, provide direct or reasonable assistance with arranging for transportation to medical and social services appointments, shopping, and other recreation, and provide the name of or other identifying information about the [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) documented a competency for the delegation of medication administration for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) documented a competency for the delegation of medication administration for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain a written emergency preparedness (EP) plan with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a written emergency preparedness (EP) plan with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
- Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain fire extinguishers in accordance with MN Statute.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain fire extinguishers in accordance with MN Statute. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a fire safety and evacuation plan with required elements, failed to provide required employee training on fire safety and evacuation, and failed to conduct required evacuation drills as required.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop a fire safety and evacuation plan with required elements, failed to provide required employee training on fire safety and evacuation, and failed to conduct required evacuation drills as required. This had the potential to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
Show all 13
- Tag 910: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (a-b) Contract information Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for one of one resident (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written contract with the required content for one of one resident (R1). This had the potential to affect all residents living in the assisted living facility. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The contract must include in a conspicuous place and manner on the contract the legal name and the health facility identification of the facility. [...]”
- Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (a) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-C).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-C). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”
- Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-C).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations included all the required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-C). [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”
- Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) provided direct supervision of staff performing delegated tasks within 30 calendar days after the task was delegated for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-B, ULP-C).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) provided direct supervision of staff performing delegated tasks within 30 calendar days after the task was delegated for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-B, ULP-C). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”
- Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure direct-care staff completed the required amount of dementia care training in the required time frame for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure direct-care staff completed the required amount of dementia care training in the required time frame for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”
- Tag 1820: 144G.71 Subd. 13 Prescriptions Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of two residents (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of two residents (R1). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected [...]”
Rule cited: “There must be a current written or electronically recorded prescription as defined in section 151.01, subdivision 16a, for all prescribed medications that the assisted living facility is managing for the resident.”
- Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of two residents (R1) using oxygen.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure written or electronically recorded prescriptions were obtained for one of two residents (R1) using oxygen. [...]”
Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”
- Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7)
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care, medical or nursing standards for one of one resident (R1) when the licensee failed to ensure supplemental oxygen (O2) tanks were stored safely to prevent tipping.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide care and services according to acceptable health care, medical or nursing standards for one of one resident (R1) when the licensee failed to ensure supplemental oxygen (O2) tanks were stored safely to prevent tipping. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.
- Tag 490: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (ii)-(vii) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Substantiated investigations (state reports)
- March 1, 2022 · report HL36907001M
Inconclusive investigations (1)
- May 3, 2023 · report HL369073164M · MDH finding: Inconclusive
Details
Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP) abused a resident (resident #1) when he told the resident he would break the resident's legs and stick a plunger up the resident's rectum.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was inconclusive.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: abuse inconclusive.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was inconclusive. Although resident #1 reported the incident to several people, he was inconsistent with what he reported. The AP denied the allegations. In addition, there were conflicting stories between family members and other residents on what happened. Multiple staff stated they were afraid of resident #1 because he was physically and verbally aggressive.”
Action taken by facility: “The AP no longer works at the facility.”
Action taken by MDH: “The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”
Survey completed March 30, 2023: 2 correction orders
- Tag 620: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (a) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the requirements for reporting suspected maltreatment for one of two residents (R2) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to comply with the requirements for reporting suspected maltreatment for one of two residents (R2) with records reviewed. The licensee was aware of the incident but failed to immediately report the incident to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The assisted living facility must comply with the requirements for the reporting of maltreatment of vulnerable adults in section 626.557. [...]”
- Tag 3000: 626.557 Subd. 3 Timing of report Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to comply with the requirements for reporting suspected maltreatment for one of
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to comply with the requirements for reporting suspected maltreatment for one of two residents (R2) with records reviewed. The licensee was aware of the incident but failed to immediately report the incident to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) A mandated reporter who has reason to believe that a vulnerable adult is being or has been maltreated, or who has knowledge that a vulnerable adult has sustained a physical injury which is not reasonably explained shall immediately report the information [...]”
- Tag 620: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (a) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 4 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee COZY BARAKA HOME CARE INC.
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility
- License number
- 425708
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2026-05-25
- Licensed capacity
- 4
- Licensee
- COZY BARAKA HOME CARE INC.
- County
- Hennepin County
- Administrator/Authorized Agent
- Mardiya Jaffer
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.5 mi, nursing home 1.0 mi, pharmacy 1.0 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- North Memorial Health Hospital, Robbinsdale. 2.5 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 1 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Good Samaritan Ambassador, New Hope. 1.0 mile away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Home Health Care Inc, Golden Valley. 2.4 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Hy-Vee Pharmacy. 1.0 mile away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55427 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Fmc Dialysis - Golden Valley, Golden Valley, 2.1 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fkc - Robbinsdale Dialysis, Robbinsdale, 2.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Davita New Hope Dialysis Center, New Hope, 3.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 26 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55427.
Superior Hospice Inc., office in Golden Valley, 2.4 miles away, straight line
North Memorial Home Hlth Hospc, office in Robbinsdale, 3.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Moments Hospice, office in Golden Valley, 3.1 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Twin Cities Physicians Professional Corporation, Golden Valley. 2.8 miles away, straight line. 3 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
- Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
- Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
- Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Cozy Baraka Home Care, Boone Avenue North provide?
Cozy Baraka Home Care, Boone Avenue North is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in New Hope, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 4 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Cozy Baraka Home Care, Boone Avenue North?
No. We publish state licensing details for Cozy Baraka Home Care, Boone Avenue North but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Cozy Baraka Home Care, Boone Avenue North cost?
Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Cozy Baraka Home Care, Boone Avenue North does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Cozy Baraka Home Care, Boone Avenue North?
Visit Cozy Baraka Home Care, Boone Avenue North at 3554 Boone Avenue North, New Hope, MN 55427.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid