Assisted Living and Memory Care
Clgv Assisted Living Memory
5825 St. Croix Avenue North, Golden Valley, MN 55422 · Map
Licensed for 18 residents · CLGV ASSISTED LIVING MEMORY
Clgv Assisted Living Memory is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in Golden Valley, Minnesota. It is licensed for 18 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 18 residents
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 423797, current license dated Jan 1, 2026. Licensee CLGV ASSISTED LIVING MEMORY.
Nearest emergency room
1.1 miles
North Memorial Health Hospital, rated 1 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clgv Assisted Living Memory this community | 18 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated | |
| Clgv Assisted Living | 0.0 mi | 50 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated |
| The Caring Sisters Home Care | 0.2 mi | 4 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Honesty Care Home | 0.5 mi | 4 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| S & H Health Care Services, 4935 Sorell Ave | 0.6 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | No record |
State inspection record0 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- February 20, 2025
- Evaluations on record
- 2
- Investigations substantiated
- 0 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 0 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 1 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (February 20, 2025, state report 5PU211)
MDH: “On February 18, 2025, through February 20, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider.”
Survey completed February 20, 2025: 10 correction orders
- Tag 220: 144G.17 LICENSE RENEWAL Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide information sufficient to show that the applicant met the requirements of licensure, including items required under section 144G.12, subdivision 1; which required documentation of compliance with the background study requirements in section 144G.13 for the owner, controlling individuals, and managerial officials.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide information sufficient to show that the applicant met the requirements of licensure, including items required under section 144G.12, subdivision 1; which required documentation of compliance with the background study requirements in section 144G.13 for the owner, controlling individuals, and managerial officials. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “A license that is not a provisional license may be renewed for a period of up to one year if the licensee: (1) submits an application for renewal in the format provided by the commissioner at least 60 calendar days before expiration of the license; (2) [...]”
- Tag 340: 144G.30 Subd. 5 Correction orders Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop and execute a plan of correction (POC) for 144G.62 Subd. 4., registered nurse (RN) 30-day supervision and
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop and execute a plan of correction (POC) for 144G.62 Subd. 4., registered nurse (RN) 30-day supervision and 144G.82 Subd. 3., dementia policies, issued during their previous routine survey. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) A correction order may be issued whenever the commissioner finds upon survey or during a complaint investigation that a facility, a managerial official, an agent of the facility, or staff of the facility is not in compliance with this chapter. [...]”
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained required content to include orientation, tuberculosis (TB) and annual training documentation for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained required content to include orientation, tuberculosis (TB) and annual training documentation for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a tuberculosis (TB) chest X-ray (CXR) was accompanied by a positive TB Mantoux (skin test) or blood test completed within 90 days prior to the CXR for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-L).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a tuberculosis (TB) chest X-ray (CXR) was accompanied by a positive TB Mantoux (skin test) or blood test completed within 90 days prior to the CXR for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-L). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”
Show all 10
- Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure resident records included a discharge summary for two of two residents (R1, R3).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure resident records included a discharge summary for two of two residents (R1, R3). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large [...]”
Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure they received a background study (BGS) clearance from NETStudy 2.0 (web-based system use to submit BGS requests to the Department of Human Services (DHS)) in affiliation with the assisted
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure they received a background study (BGS) clearance from NETStudy 2.0 (web-based system use to submit BGS requests to the Department of Human Services (DHS)) in affiliation with the assisted living licensee's health facility identification number (HFID) for two of 13 employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP-I, ULP-J). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”
- Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing a delegated task within 30 days of providing services for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-L).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing a delegated task within 30 days of providing services for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-L). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”
- Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the required ten dementia care policies.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop the required ten dementia care policies. Further, the licensee failed to ensure policies and procedures for assisted living with dementia care (ALFDC) were provided to residents and the residents' legal and designated representatives at the time of move in for one of one dementia care resident (R2). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.
Fines assessed by MDH
- Tag 1290 (144g.60 Subdivision 1 - Background Studies Required): $3,000.00
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.
Earlier evaluations (1)
- July 6, 2022: report TDN411 · 19 correction orders
Details
Survey completed July 6, 2022: 19 correction orders
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required staffing plan was developed and posted as required, potentially affecting the licensee's current residents, staff and visitors of the licensee.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the required staffing plan was developed and posted as required, potentially affecting the licensee's current residents, staff and visitors of the licensee. [...]”
Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to adhere to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to adhere to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. This had the potential to affect all residents of the licensee. [...]”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”
- Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to implement and follow the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) infection control guidance recommendations for eye protection for health care workers related to COVID-19.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to implement and follow the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) infection control guidance recommendations for eye protection for health care workers related to COVID-19. In addition, the licensee failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during medication administration and during meal service in the dining area. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C) with record reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C) with record reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the required evacuation drill frequency.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on document review and interview, the licensee failed to provide the required evacuation drill frequency. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
Show all 19
- Tag 970: 144.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property for two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property for two of two residents (R1, R2) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”
- Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (a) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) day
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure training and competency was completed for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C) to include all required content with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure training and competency was completed for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C) to include all required content with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”
- Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) day
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review the licensee failed to ensure training and competency evaluations were completed for all required skill areas prior to providing services for one of one unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-C) with record reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”
- Tag 1460: 144G.63 Subdivision 1 Orientation of staff and supervisors Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) day
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received orientation to assisted living licensing requirements and regulations for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C) with employee record reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received orientation to assisted living licensing requirements and regulations for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C) with employee record reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “All staff providing and supervising direct services must complete an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing assisted living services to residents. [...]”
- Tag 1640: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (a-e) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) day
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the current service plan included a signature or other authentication by the resident and/or representative to document agreement on the services to be provided for four of five residents (R1, R4, R5, R6) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the current service plan included a signature or other authentication by the resident and/or representative to document agreement on the services to be provided for four of five residents (R1, R4, R5, R6) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) No later than 14 calendar days after the date that services are first provided, an assisted living facility shall finalize a current written service plan. [...]”
- Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 (f) Service plan, implementation and revisions to Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for five of five residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the service plan included the required content for five of five residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6) with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”
- Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medication was administered as ordered for one of one resident (R2) with record reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medication was administered as ordered for one of one resident (R2) with record reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”
- Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to document in the resident's record the disposition of the medication including the medication's name, strength, prescription number as applicable, quantity, to whom the medications were given, date of disposition, and names of staff and other individuals involved in the disposition for one of one discharged resident (R3) with record reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to document in the resident's record the disposition of the medication including the medication's name, strength, prescription number as applicable, quantity, to whom the medications were given, date of disposition, and names of staff and other individuals involved in the disposition for one of one discharged resident (R3) with record reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”
- Tag 1930: 144G.72 Subd. 2 Policies and procedures Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop, implement, and maintain up-to-date written treatment or therapy management policies and procedures with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop, implement, and maintain up-to-date written treatment or therapy management policies and procedures with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility that provides treatment and therapy management services must develop, implement, and maintain up-to-date written treatment or therapy management policies and procedures. [...]”
- Tag 1940: 144G.72 Subd. 3 Individualized treatment or therapy managemen Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop a treatment management plan to include all required content for one of one resident (R5) with record reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop a treatment management plan to include all required content for one of one resident (R5) with record reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “For each resident receiving management of ordered or prescribed treatments or therapy services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the treatment or therapy services that will be provided to the [...]”
- Tag 1970: 144G.72 Subd. 6 Treatment and therapy orders Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure up-to-date written or electronically recorded orders were maintained for treatment of application of TED stockings for one of one resident (R5) with record reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure up-to-date written or electronically recorded orders were maintained for treatment of application of TED stockings for one of one resident (R5) with record reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “There must be an up-to-date written or electronically recorded order from an authorized prescriber for all treatments and therapies. [...]”
- Tag 2040: 144G.81 Subdivision 1 Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a hazard vulnerability or safety risk assessment that identified hazards on and around the property.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, document review, and interview, the licensee failed to provide a hazard vulnerability or safety risk assessment that identified hazards on and around the property. Mitigation of hazards to protect residents from harm was not included. This had the potential to directly affect all residents and staff. [...]”
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care that has a secured dementia care unit must meet the requirements of section 144G.45 and the following additional requirements: (1) a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk must be performed on and around [...]”
- Tag 2110: 144G.82 Subd. 3 Policies Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the required policies and procedures were provided to each resident and/or the resident's legal and designated representative at the time of move-in. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) In addition to the policies and procedures required in the licensing of all facilities, the assisted living facility with dementia care licensee must develop and implement policies and procedures that address the: (1) philosophy of how services are [...]”
- Tag 2260: 144G.90 Subd. 3 Notice of dementia training Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide in written or electronic form to residents, families, or other persons who request it, an accurate description of the dementia care training program with the required content with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide in written or electronic form to residents, families, or other persons who request it, an accurate description of the dementia care training program with the required content with records reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care shall make available in written or electronic form, to residents and families or other persons who request it, a description of the training program and related training it provides, including the categories of [...]”
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.
- Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Unsubstantiated investigations (1)
- May 22, 2025 · report HL304337521C
Details
Survey completed April 16, 2025: no correction orders issued.
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 18 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee CLGV ASSISTED LIVING MEMORY
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
- License number
- 423797
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2026-01-01
- Licensed capacity
- 18
- Licensee
- CLGV ASSISTED LIVING MEMORY
- County
- Hennepin County
- Administrator/Authorized Agent
- Angela Milhauser
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.1 mi, nursing home 0.0 mi, pharmacy 2.7 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- North Memorial Health Hospital, Robbinsdale. 1.1 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 1 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Covenant Living of Golden Valley Care & Rehab CTR, Golden Valley. 0.0 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Home Health Care Inc, Golden Valley. 1.9 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walgreens. 2.7 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55422 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Fmc Dialysis - Golden Valley, Golden Valley, 0.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Robbinsdale Dialysis, Robbinsdale, 2.1 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fkc - Robbinsdale Dialysis, Robbinsdale, 2.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 28 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55422.
Moments Hospice, office in Golden Valley, 0.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars)
Superior Hospice Inc., office in Golden Valley, 1.9 miles away, straight line
North Memorial Home Hlth Hospc, office in Robbinsdale, 1.9 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Twin Cities Physicians Professional Corporation, Golden Valley. 0.3 miles away, straight line. 3 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; in FEMA's high-risk flood area (Zone AE)
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Zone AE: 1% annual chance flood area (high risk); base flood elevation set. This is inside FEMA's Special Flood Hazard Area, where flood insurance is required for federally backed mortgages. (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively high. By hazard: inland flooding relatively high, wildfire very low, tornado very high, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- This address is in FEMA's high-risk flood area. Where do residents go in an evacuation, and how do you move them?
- The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
- What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
- How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Clgv Assisted Living Memory provide?
Clgv Assisted Living Memory is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in Golden Valley, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 18 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Clgv Assisted Living Memory?
No. We publish state licensing details for Clgv Assisted Living Memory but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Clgv Assisted Living Memory cost?
Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Clgv Assisted Living Memory does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Clgv Assisted Living Memory?
Visit Clgv Assisted Living Memory at 5825 St. Croix Avenue North, Golden Valley, MN 55422.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid