Lilisity

Assisted Living

Circle Drive Manor Assisted Li

56733 State Highway 56 South, West Concord, MN 55985 · Map
Licensed for 10 residents · CIRCLE DRIVE MANOR ASSISTED LIVING, LLC

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Circle Drive Manor Assisted Li is a state-licensed assisted living community in West Concord, Minnesota. It is licensed for 10 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
10 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: May 8, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 10 residents

Assisted Living Facility 422425, current license dated Oct 1, 2025. Licensee CIRCLE DRIVE MANOR ASSISTED LIVING, LLC.

Nearest emergency room

16.9 miles

Owatonna Hospital, rated 5 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Circle Drive Manor Assisted Li this community10Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Abilit Holdings Prairie Meadow9.4 mi70Not publishedActive2 substantiated
Vista at Pine Haven13.6 mi30Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Benedictine Living Community |15.1 mi65Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Northstar of Owatonna15.7 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
May 8, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (May 8, 2025, state report JY3E11)

MDH: “On May 5, 2025, through May 8, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider.”

Survey completed May 8, 2025: 20 correction orders

  • Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a copy of the Uniform Disclosure of Assisted Living Services and Amenities (UDALSA) with the required content for two of two residents (R6, R7).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a copy of the Uniform Disclosure of Assisted Living Services and Amenities (UDALSA) with the required content for two of two residents (R6, R7). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”

  • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required staffing plan was developed as required, potentially affecting the licensee's residents, staff, and any visitors of the licensee.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the required staffing plan was developed as required, potentially affecting the licensee's residents, staff, and any visitors of the licensee. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Subd. 1a (a-b) Minimum requirements; required food services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and is issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626. [...]”

  • Tag 580: 144G.42 Subd. 2 Quality management Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to implement and maintain a quality management program appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to implement and maintain a quality management program appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. This had the potential to affect all current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “The facility shall engage in quality management appropriate to the size of the facility and relevant to the type of services provided. [...]”

  • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 (b) Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for two of two residents (R6, R7).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individual abuse prevention plan (IAPP) was developed to include the required content for two of two residents (R6, R7). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

Show all 20
  • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained the required content for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained the required content for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

  • Tag 660: 144G.42 Subd. 9 Tuberculosis prevention and control Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included a facility TB risk assessment, documentation of a completed health history and symptom screening, including completion of a two-step TST (tuberculin skin test) or other evidence of TB screening such as a blood test for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D, ULP-E).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain a tuberculosis (TB) prevention program, based on the most current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which included a facility TB risk assessment, documentation of a completed health history and symptom screening, including completion of a two-step TST (tuberculin skin test) or other evidence of TB screening such as a blood test for two of two employees (unlicensed [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must establish and maintain a comprehensive tuberculosis infection control program according to the most current tuberculosis infection control guidelines issued by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division [...]”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop an all-hazards risk assessment emergency preparedness program and plan to include Appendix Z required elements and failed to post the plan prominently.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop an all-hazards risk assessment emergency preparedness program and plan to include Appendix Z required elements and failed to post the plan prominently. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training and drills.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content and provide the required training and drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure direct supervision of two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-D, ULP-E) performing delegated tasks was provided by the registered nurse (RN) within 30 calendar days after the date on which the individuals began working for the licensee.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure direct supervision of two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-D, ULP-E) performing delegated tasks was provided by the registered nurse (RN) within 30 calendar days after the date on which the individuals began working for the licensee. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

  • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure annual training included all required topics for each 12 months of employment for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure annual training included all required topics for each 12 months of employment for one of one employee (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

  • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-E) received the required amount of dementia care training in the required time frame.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-E) received the required amount of dementia care training in the required time frame. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

  • Tag 1700: 144G.71 Subd. 2 Provision of medication management services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a face-to-face medication management assessment to include all required content for one of one resident (R6) receiving medication management services.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted a face-to-face medication management assessment to include all required content for one of one resident (R6) receiving medication management services. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident who requests medication management services, the facility shall, prior to providing medication management services, have a registered nurse, licensed health professional, or authorized prescriber under section 151.37 conduct an [...]”

  • Tag 1710: 144G.71 Subd. 3 Individualized medication monitoring and reas Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure reassessment of medication management services at a minimum annually included all required content for one of one resident (R7).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure reassessment of medication management services at a minimum annually included all required content for one of one resident (R7). [...]”

    Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must monitor and reassess the resident's medication management services as needed under subdivision 2 when the resident presents with symptoms or other issues that may be medication-related and, at a minimum, annually.”

  • Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure an individualized medication management plan included all required content for one of two residents (R7).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure an individualized medication management plan included all required content for one of two residents (R7). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, the assisted living facility must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the medication management services that will be provided to the resident. [...]”

  • Tag 1750: 144G.71 Subd. 7 Delegation of medication administration Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-D, owner/ULP-B) completed insulin administration via a prefilled insulin pen according to manufacturer instructions for two of two residents with insulin (R5, R6).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-D, owner/ULP-B) completed insulin administration via a prefilled insulin pen according to manufacturer instructions for two of two residents with insulin (R5, R6). [...]”

    Rule cited: “When administration of medications is delegated to unlicensed personnel, the assisted living facility must ensure that the registered nurse has: (1) instructed the unlicensed personnel in the proper methods to administer the medications, and the unlicensed [...]”

  • Tag 1770: 144G.71 Subd. 9 Documentation of medication setup Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure documentation of medication setup included the required content for two of two residents (R6, R7).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure documentation of medication setup included the required content for two of two residents (R6, R7). [...]”

    Rule cited: “Documentation of dates of medication setup, name of medication, quantity of dose, times to be administered, route of administration, and name of person completing medication setup must be done at the time of setup.”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to monitor for expired medications and failed to ensure all medications bore a proper label for one of ten residents (R4).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to monitor for expired medications and failed to ensure all medications bore a proper label for one of ten residents (R4). [...]”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

  • Tag 1950: 144G.72 Subd. 4 Administration of treatments and therapy Level 2, pattern scope, scope/level letter E · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) specified, in writing, specific instructions and documented those instructions in the resident record for two of three residents (R5, R7) with treatments.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) specified, in writing, specific instructions and documented those instructions in the resident record for two of three residents (R5, R7) with treatments. [...]”

    Rule cited: “Ordered or prescribed treatments or therapies must be administered by a nurse, physician, or other licensed health professional authorized to perform the treatment or therapy, or may be delegated or assigned to unlicensed personnel by the licensed health [...]”

  • Tag 2310: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (a) Appropriate care and services Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: IMMEDIATE · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards for the licensee's two residents (R1, R2) who both had bed rails.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the care and services were provided according to acceptable health care and medical, or nursing standards for the licensee's two residents (R1, R2) who both had bed rails. This resulted in an immediate correction order on May 5, 2025. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to care and assisted living services that are appropriate based on the resident's needs and according to an up-to-date service plan subject to accepted health care standards.”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): Food and beverage inspection report included

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 2310 (144g.91 Subd. 4 (a) - Appropriate Care And Services): $3,000.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • December 13, 2022: report 32O311 · 16 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed December 13, 2022: 16 correction orders

    • Tag 470: 144G.41 Subdivision 1 Minimum requirements Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure night staff were awake to monitor residents needs and to minimize the risk of self-abuse.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure night staff were awake to monitor residents needs and to minimize the risk of self-abuse. This had the potential to affect all eight residents residing in the facility. This resulted in an immediate correction order on December 12, 2022, at 1:20 p.m. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(11) develop and implement a staffing plan for determining its staffing level that: (i) includes an evaluation, to be conducted at least twice a year, of the appropriateness of staffing levels in the facility; (ii) ensures sufficient staffing at all times to [...]”

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This had the potential to affect all residents in the Assisted Living facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    • Tag 485: 144G.41 Subd 1. (13) (i) (A) and (C) Minimum Requirements Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a menu was prepared and provided to residents a week in advance.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a menu was prepared and provided to residents a week in advance. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    • Tag 495: 144G.41 Subd. 1 (14) Minimum Requirements Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure that a registered nurse was available on-call 24 hours a day, seven days per week.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure that a registered nurse was available on-call 24 hours a day, seven days per week. This had the potential to affect all residents and staff of the facility. This resulted in an immediate correction order on December 12, 2022, at 1:20 p.m. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(14) provide staff access to an on-call registered nurse 24 hours per day, seven days per week.”

    • Tag 550: 144G.41 Subd. 7 Resident grievances; reporting maltreatment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to post the required information related to the grievance procedure. This had the potential to affect all the licensee's current residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “All facilities must post in a conspicuous place information about the facilities' grievance procedure, and the name, telephone number, and e-mail contact information for the individuals who are responsible for handling resident grievances. [...]”

    Show all 16
    • Tag 640: 144G.42 Subd. 7 Posting information for reporting suspected c Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to support protection and safety by not posting information and phone numbers for reporting to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) in common areas and near telephones in the licensee's assisted living facility.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to support protection and safety by not posting information and phone numbers for reporting to the Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) in common areas and near telephones in the licensee's assisted living facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “The facility shall support protection and safety through access to the state's systems for reporting suspected criminal activity and suspected vulnerable adult maltreatment by: (1) posting the 911 emergency number in common areas and near telephones provided [...]”

    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for one of one employee (registered nurse (RN)-A).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for one of one employee (registered nurse (RN)-A). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to post an emergency preparedness plan prominently.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to post an emergency preparedness plan prominently. This had the potential to impact all residents, staff, and visitors to the licensee's facility. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to maintain the facility in good repair in regards to resident health and safety in accordance with maintenance and repair program.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the facility in good repair in regards to resident health and safety in accordance with maintenance and repair program. This deficient condition has the ability to affect all staff and residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility was unable to provide documentation associated to annual evacuation training for residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility was unable to provide documentation associated to annual evacuation training for residents. This deficient condition has the ability to affect all staff and residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 1370: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (a) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure competency evaluations were completed by a registered nurse (RN) for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-B, ULP-D, ULP-E).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure competency evaluations were completed by a registered nurse (RN) for two of two unlicensed personnel (ULP-B, ULP-D, ULP-E). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Training and competency evaluations for all unlicensed personnel must include the following: (1) documentation requirements for all services provided; (2) reports of changes in the resident's condition to the supervisor designated by the facility; (3) [...]”

    • Tag 1380: 144G.61 Subd. 2 (b) Training and evaluation of unlicensed personn Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure competency evaluations were completed by a registered nurse (RN), for three of three unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-B, ULP-D, ULP-E).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure competency evaluations were completed by a registered nurse (RN), for three of three unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-B, ULP-D, ULP-E). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) In addition to paragraph (a), training and competency evaluation for unlicensed personnel providing assisted living services must include: (1) observing, reporting, and documenting resident status; (2) basic knowledge of body functioning and changes in [...]”

    • Tag 1440: 144G.62 Subd. 4 Supervision of staff providing delegated nurs Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing delegated tasks within 30 days of providing services for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-D, ULP-E).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted direct supervision of staff performing delegated tasks within 30 days of providing services for two of two unlicensed personnel ((ULP)-D, ULP-E). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Staff who perform delegated nursing or therapy tasks must be supervised by an appropriate licensed health professional or a registered nurse according to the assisted living facility's policy where the services are being provided to verify that the work [...]”

    • Tag 1460: 144G.63 Subdivision 1 Orientation of staff and supervisors Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure staff providing services completed an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing services for one of one employee (registered nurse (RN)-A).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure staff providing services completed an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing services for one of one employee (registered nurse (RN)-A). [...]”

      Rule cited: “All staff providing and supervising direct services must complete an orientation to assisted living facility licensing requirements and regulations before providing assisted living services to residents. [...]”

    • Tag 1610: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (a-b) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive assessment of the physical and cognitive needs of the prospective resident to include all areas identified on the uniform assessment tool prior to the date on which a prospective resident executes a contract with a facility or the date on which a prospective resident moves in for two of two residents (R1, R2).

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive assessment of the physical and cognitive needs of the prospective resident to include all areas identified on the uniform assessment tool prior to the date on which a prospective resident executes a contract with a facility or the date on which a prospective resident moves in for two of two residents (R1, R2). [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”

    • Tag 2410: 144G.91 Subd. 13 Personal and treatment privacy Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure privacy was maintained for one of one resident (R3) observed during medication administration.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to ensure privacy was maintained for one of one resident (R3) observed during medication administration. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Residents have the right to consideration of their privacy, individuality, and cultural identity as related to their social, religious, and psychological well-being. [...]”

    From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

    Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $6,000.00.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 10 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee CIRCLE DRIVE MANOR ASSISTED LIVING, LLC
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
422425
License status
Active
Current license dated
2025-10-01
Licensed capacity
10
Licensee
CIRCLE DRIVE MANOR ASSISTED LIVING, LLC
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Melissa Christianson

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 16.9 mi, nursing home 6.4 mi, pharmacy 18.1 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Owatonna Hospital, Owatonna. 16.9 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 5 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Fairview Care Center, Dodge Center. 6.4 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Steele County Phns, Owatonna. 16.9 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
OMC NW Pharmacy. 18.1 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55985 as metropolitan (metropolitan high commuting).
Hospice
7 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55985.
Mayo Clinic Hospice, office in Rochester, 19.2 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Moments Hospice, office in Rochester, 21.5 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars)
Seasons Hospice, office in Rochester, 22.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Mayo Clinic, Rochester. 19.2 miles away, straight line. 15 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively high, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively low, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  4. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  5. What fees are charged at move-in?
  6. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  7. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  8. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  9. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
  10. Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Circle Drive Manor Assisted Li provide?

Circle Drive Manor Assisted Li is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in West Concord, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 10 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Circle Drive Manor Assisted Li?

No. We publish state licensing details for Circle Drive Manor Assisted Li but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Circle Drive Manor Assisted Li cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Circle Drive Manor Assisted Li does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Circle Drive Manor Assisted Li?

Visit Circle Drive Manor Assisted Li at 56733 State Highway 56 South, West Concord, MN 55985.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid