Lilisity

Assisted Living and Memory Care

Cerenity Care Center - Marian

200 Earl Street, St. Paul, MN 55106 · Map
Licensed for 30 residents · CERENITY CARE CENTER - MARIAN OF ST PAUL

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Cerenity Care Center - Marian is a state-licensed assisted living, memory care community in St. Paul, Minnesota. It is licensed for 30 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingAlso memory care
30 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility dementia care
$2,200 to $4,800/moTypical assisted living start in Minnesota, from 74 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.
Memory Care in Minnesota typically starts at $3,900 to $8,600 a month. Based on 40 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Care and services

From the community’s website

What Cerenity Care Center - Marian says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.

  • Offers respite or short-term stays. Respite Care (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Provides transportation. For individuals who need assistance with regular daily activities such as meals, housekeeping, transportation to appointments and personal care. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • 3 meals a day. The Assisted Living apartments provide additional supportive assistance with daily life, such as weekly housekeeping and three meals a day. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
  • Has a secured outdoor area. The beautifully landscaped enclosed courtyard is a year-round delight—blooming in spring, vibrant in summer, colorful in fall, and serene in winter. (page, checked Oct 12, 2026)

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

1Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: May 13, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 30 residents

Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care 422128, current license dated Sep 1, 2025. Licensee CERENITY CARE CENTER - MARIAN OF ST PAUL.

Nearest emergency room

2.0 miles

Regions Hospital, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Cerenity Care Center - Marian this community30Not publishedActive1 substantiated
Cerenity Residence Marian of S0.1 mi135Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Zencare Health0.1 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Precious Health Services Llf0.2 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Blue Moon Center0.6 mi4Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record1 substantiated
Last evaluation
May 13, 2025
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
1 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (May 13, 2025, state report CKDY11)

MDH: “On May 12, 2025, through May 13, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider.”

Survey completed May 13, 2025: 8 correction orders

  • Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program to comply with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. The licensee failed to ensure direct care staff performed adequate hand hygiene (HH) for one of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”

  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b-f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the required training for staff.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide the required training for staff. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Two (2) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to obtain a cleared Department of Human Services (DHS) background study, associated with the licensee's health facility identification number (HFID) for two of eight employees (resident services director (RSD)-G, housekeeper (H)-I).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview, and record review, the licensee failed to obtain a cleared Department of Human Services (DHS) background study, associated with the licensee's health facility identification number (HFID) for two of eight employees (resident services director (RSD)-G, housekeeper (H)-I). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”

  • Tag 1470: 144G.63 Subd. 2 Content of required orientation Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received orientation to include all required content for one of two employees (registered nurse (RN)-C).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received orientation to include all required content for one of two employees (registered nurse (RN)-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The orientation must contain the following topics: (1) an overview of this chapter; (2) an introduction and review of the facility's policies and procedures related to the provision of assisted living services by the individual staff person; (3) handling [...]”

  • Tag 1540: 144G.64 (a) TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees had completed at least eight (8) hours of initial dementia training for supervisors of direct care staff within 80 working hours of the employment start date for one of two employees (registered nurse (RN)-C).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees had completed at least eight (8) hours of initial dementia training for supervisors of direct care staff within 80 working hours of the employment start date for one of two employees (registered nurse (RN)-C). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(3) for assisted living facilities with dementia care, direct-care employees must have completed at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 80 working hours of the employment start date. [...]”

Show all 8
  • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing resident monitoring and reassessment, utilizing a uniform assessment tool, no more than 14 days after start of services for one of three residents (R2).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) conducted ongoing resident monitoring and reassessment, utilizing a uniform assessment tool, no more than 14 days after start of services for one of three residents (R2). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to include an original prescription label with legible information and expired found in one of two medication carts.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to include an original prescription label with legible information and expired found in one of two medication carts. [...]”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

  • Tag 2040: 144G.81 Subdivision 1 Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk assessment of the physical environment on and around the property.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on record review and interview, the licensee failed to provide a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk assessment of the physical environment on and around the property. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all staff, residents, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “An assisted living facility with dementia care that has a secured dementia care unit must meet the requirements of section 144G.45 and the following additional requirements: (1) a hazard vulnerability assessment or safety risk must be performed on and around [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.

Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): No orders were issued for this inspection report.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • March 30, 2023: report BE1F11 · 3 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed March 30, 2023: 3 correction orders

    • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the facility's fire safety and evacuation plan with required elements.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on record review and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the facility's fire safety and evacuation plan with required elements. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 3090: 144.6502, Subd. 8 Notice to Visitors Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the required notice was posted at the main entry way of the establishment to display statutory language to disclose electronic monitoring activity, potentially affecting all current residents in the assisted living facility, staff and any visitors of the licensee.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the required notice was posted at the main entry way of the establishment to display statutory language to disclose electronic monitoring activity, potentially affecting all current residents in the assisted living facility, staff and any visitors of the licensee. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) A facility must post a sign at each facility entrance accessible to visitors that states: "Electronic monitoring devices, including security cameras and audio devices, may be present to record persons and activities." (b) The facility is responsible for [...]”

    From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; no immediate fines.

Substantiated investigations (state reports)

  • January 13, 2025 · report HL359706922M · MDH finding: Substantiated, individual responsibility
    Details

    Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP), facility staff, abused a resident when the AP had sexual contact with the resident.”

    “The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) determined abuse was substantiated.”

    “The AP was responsible for the maltreatment.”

    Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: abuse substantiated (individual responsibility).

    MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) determined abuse was substantiated. The AP was responsible for the maltreatment. The resident consistently reported a traumatic sexual encounter with the AP. The resident stated the AP sexually touched her vagina when she was laying naked on the bed.”

    Action taken by facility: “The facility investigated the incident, interviewed all residents regarding safety, re-educated all staff on the Minnesota Vulnerable Adult Act. The AP no longer works at the facility.”

    Action taken by MDH: “The facility was issued a correction order regarding the vulnerable adult's right to be free from maltreatment.”

    Survey completed December 18, 2024: 1 correction order

    • Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and an individual person was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”

      Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 30 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee CERENITY CARE CENTER - MARIAN OF ST PAUL
License type
Assisted Living Facility Dementia Care
License number
422128
License status
Active
Current license dated
2025-09-01
Licensed capacity
30
Licensee
CERENITY CARE CENTER - MARIAN OF ST PAUL

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.0 mi, nursing home 0.0 mi, pharmacy 1.6 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Regions Hospital, Saint Paul. 2.0 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Cerenity Marian of St Paul LLC, Saint Paul. 0.0 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Care Plus Home Health Agency Inc, Saint Paul. 0.8 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 1.6 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55106 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Fmc Dialysis Services Of St Paul, Saint Paul, 0.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Phalen Dialysis, Saint Paul, 1.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Sun Ray Dialysis Unit, Saint Paul, 1.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
25 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55106.
Hospice Of The Midwest, office in Woodbury, 4.4 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Sholom Hospice, office in Saint Paul, 4.5 miles away, straight line
St Croix Hospice, office in Oakdale, 4.8 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Fairview Health Services, Saint Paul. 5.3 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in January 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  3. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  4. How many caregivers work in memory care during the day, the evening and overnight, and for how many residents?
  5. What dementia training does each caregiver get before working alone, and every year after?
  6. How do staff respond when a resident is agitated, frightened or tries to leave?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
The community’s own websiteSee above
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Cerenity Care Center - Marian provide?

Cerenity Care Center - Marian is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living, memory care in St. Paul, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 30 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Cerenity Care Center - Marian?

No. We publish state licensing details for Cerenity Care Center - Marian but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Cerenity Care Center - Marian cost?

Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Cerenity Care Center - Marian does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Cerenity Care Center - Marian?

Use Cerenity Care Center - Marian's website, cerenityseniorcare.org/marian-of-st-paul-senior-living, or visit at 200 Earl Street, St. Paul, MN 55106.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid