Assisted Living
Caretta Senior Living Maplewoo (Assisted Living)
1910 County Road C East, Maplewood, MN 55109 · Map
Licensed for 58 residents · CARETTA SENIOR LIVING MAPLEWOOD LLC
Caretta Senior Living Maplewoo (Assisted Living) is a state-licensed assisted living community in Maplewood, Minnesota. It is licensed for 58 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 58 residents
Assisted Living Facility 422916, current license dated Sep 27, 2025. Licensee CARETTA SENIOR LIVING MAPLEWOOD LLC.
Nearest emergency room
0.9 miles
M Health Fairview St John'S Hospital, rated 5 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caretta Senior Living Maplewoo (Assisted Living) this community | 58 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated | |
| Caretta Senior Living Maplewoo (Assisted Living and Memory Care) | 0.1 mi | 26 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Carefree Cottages of Maplewood | 0.6 mi | 135 | $1,200/mo | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Scenic Hills Alternative Care, 1747 Gervais Avenue | 0.7 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Scenic Hills Alternative Care, 1729 Gervais Avenue | 0.7 mi | 6 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
State inspection record0 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- September 25, 2025
- Evaluations on record
- 1
- Investigations substantiated
- 0 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 1 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 0 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (September 25, 2025, state report MUMB11)
MDH: “On September 22, 2025, through September 25, 2025, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider and the following correction orders are issued.”
Survey completed September 25, 2025: 10 correction orders
- Tag 180: 144G.16 Subd. 2 Initial survey Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Two (2) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to notify the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) within two days of beginning to provide assisted living services under the provisional assisted living license.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to notify the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) within two days of beginning to provide assisted living services under the provisional assisted living license. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) During the provisional license period, the commissioner shall survey the provisional licensee after the commissioner is notified or has evidence that the provisional licensee is providing assisted living services to at least one resident. [...]”
- Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the uniform checklist disclosure of services (UDALSA) accurately reflected services provided by the licensee.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the uniform checklist disclosure of services (UDALSA) accurately reflected services provided by the licensee. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 (a) Staff records Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the employee record contained the required content for two of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B, ULP-E). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid staff member, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 900: 144G.50 Subdivision 1 Contract required Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide to the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) a complete unsigned copy of the assisted living contract.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide to the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) a complete unsigned copy of the assisted living contract. This had the potential to affect all current residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) An assisted living facility may not offer or provide housing or assisted living services to any individual unless it has executed a written contract with the resident. [...]”
- Tag 920: 144G.50 Subd. 2 (c) Contract information Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for two of two residents (R2, R3).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to execute a written assisted living contract with the required content for two of two residents (R2, R3). This practice resulted in a level one violation (a violation that will cause only minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has potential to affect a large portion or all of the [...]”
Rule cited: “(c) The contract must include: (1) a disclosure of the category of assisted living facility license held by the facility and, if the facility is not an assisted living facility with dementia care, a disclosure that it does not hold an assisted living facility [...]”
Show all 10
- Tag 970: 144G.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the licensee's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the licensee's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”
- Tag 1730: 144G.71 Subd. 5 Individualized medication management plan Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain an accurate individualized medication management record for one of one resident (R2) receiving medication management services.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to maintain an accurate individualized medication management record for one of one resident (R2) receiving medication management services. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) For each resident receiving medication management services, a registered nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, or qualified staff delegated the task by a registered nurse must prepare and include in the service plan a written statement of the [...]”
- Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to administer medications according to provider orders for one of two residents (R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to administer medications according to provider orders for one of two residents (R2). This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death), and was issued at an isolated scope (when one or a limited number of residents are affected or [...]”
Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”
- Tag 1910: 144G.71 Subd. 22 Disposition of medications Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to document in the resident's record the disposition of the medication in for one of two discharged residents (R1).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to document in the resident's record the disposition of the medication in for one of two discharged residents (R1). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Any current medications being managed by the assisted living facility must be provided to the resident when the resident's service plan ends or medication management services are no longer part of the service plan. [...]”
- Tag 2320: 144G.91 Subd. 4 (b) Appropriate care and services Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered according to policy and accepted standards of practice by one of two unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B observed administrating medications.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were administered according to policy and accepted standards of practice by one of two unlicensed personnel (ULP)-B observed administrating medications. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Residents have the right to receive health care and other assisted living services with continuity from people who are properly trained and competent to perform their duties and in sufficient numbers to adequately provide the services agreed to in the [...]”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance; MDH granted the assisted living license; no immediate fines.
Food and beverage inspection (included in this report): No orders were issued for this inspection report.
Inconclusive investigations (1)
- May 18, 2026 · report HL408838702M · MDH finding: Inconclusive
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected the resident when they failed to administer insulin as ordered and the resident was hospitalized for high blood sugar.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was inconclusive.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect inconclusive.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was inconclusive. The resident experienced high blood sugars with hospitalization and diagnoses of an infection. After hospitalization, the facility had a transcription error that resulted in the resident having both long-acting and short-acting insulin administered close to the same time, resulting in a low blood sugar. Because the investigation could not determine who the resident's primary care provider was, it was unknown if the decrease in insulin order was a result of the low blood sugar or due to the facility's limitations to providing sliding scale (dose based on blood sugar results). Additionally, the facility failed to monitor the resident's blood sugar for two days prior to the second hospitalization, aside from one blood sugar reading that was high, but not a medical emergency. [...]”
Action taken by facility: “The facility sent the resident to the hospital for further evaluation when high blood sugar results were received.”
Action taken by MDH: “The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”
Survey completed April 13, 2026: 3 correction orders
- Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Two (2) days
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review the licensee failed to include the correct name and contact number for the resident's medical provider in the resident's record, as required for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed. [...]”
Rule cited: “Contents of a resident record include the following for each resident: (1) identifying information, including the resident's name, date of birth, address, and telephone number; (2) the name, address, and telephone number of the resident's emergency contact, [...]”
- Tag 1760: 144G.71 Subd. 8 Documentation of administration of medication Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review the licensee failed to properly transcribe insulin orders and administer insulin correctly, as required for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed. R1 received two types of insulin close time resulting in a low blood sugar. Additionally, R1 did not receive scheduled long-acting insulin before bed and had a high blood sugar. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each medication administered by the assisted living facility staff must be documented in the resident's record. The documentation must include the signature and title of the person who administered the medication. [...]”
- Tag 1960: 144G.72 Subd. 5 Documentation of administration of treatments Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and document review the licensee failed to completed blood sugar checks as ordered for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed. R1 experienced a hospitalization for an infection with insulin order changes. The licensee failed to complete scheduled blood sugar checks four times per day for two days aside from one check. [...]”
Rule cited: “Each treatment or therapy administered by an assisted living facility must be in the resident record. [...]”
- Tag 730: 144G.43 Subd. 3 Contents of resident record Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Two (2) days
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 58 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee CARETTA SENIOR LIVING MAPLEWOOD LLC
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility
- License number
- 422916
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2025-09-27
- Licensed capacity
- 58
- Licensee
- CARETTA SENIOR LIVING MAPLEWOOD LLC
- County
- Ramsey County
- Administrator/Authorized Agent
- Angie Bantle
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 0.9 mi, nursing home 0.7 mi, pharmacy 0.5 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- M Health Fairview St John'S Hospital, Maplewood. 0.9 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 5 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Maplewood Rehabilitation Center, Maplewood. 0.7 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Mahadd Home Health Care, White Bear Lake. 2.0 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walgreens. 0.5 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55109 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Davita Maplewood Dialysis Center, Maplewood, 0.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Fmc - Maplewood Heights, Maplewood, 1.0 mile away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Phalen Dialysis, Saint Paul, 4.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 25 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55109.
Suite Living Hospice, LLC, office in White Bear Lake, 1.3 miles away, straight line
Beyond Hospice, office in Oakdale, 2.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 5 of 5 stars)
St Croix Hospice, office in Oakdale, 5.5 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Fairview Health Services, Saint Paul. 8.5 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively low. By hazard: inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively moderate, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The current license dates from 2025. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Caretta Senior Living Maplewoo (Assisted Living) provide?
Caretta Senior Living Maplewoo (Assisted Living) is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Maplewood, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 58 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Caretta Senior Living Maplewoo (Assisted Living)?
No. We publish state licensing details for Caretta Senior Living Maplewoo (Assisted Living) but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Caretta Senior Living Maplewoo (Assisted Living) cost?
Assisted Living in Minnesota typically starts at $2,200 to $4,800 a month. Based on 74 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Caretta Senior Living Maplewoo (Assisted Living) does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Caretta Senior Living Maplewoo (Assisted Living)?
Visit Caretta Senior Living Maplewoo (Assisted Living) at 1910 County Road C East, Maplewood, MN 55109.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid