Assisted Living
Capital Home Health Care
3516 73rd Avenue, Brooklyn Park, MN 55429 · Map
Licensed for 4 residents · CAPITAL HOME HEALTH CARE LLC
Capital Home Health Care is a state-licensed assisted living community in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. It is licensed for 4 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
License
Active, 4 residents
Assisted Living Facility 424560, current license dated Apr 1, 2026. Licensee CAPITAL HOME HEALTH CARE LLC.
Nearest emergency room
5.5 miles
North Memorial Health Hospital, rated 1 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Home Health Care this community | 4 | Not published | Active | 1 substantiated | |
| Well Care Health Services, 73rd Avenue | 0.0 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Estherra Care, Chowen Avenue North | 0.1 mi | 4 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
| Homenest Assisted Living | 0.2 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Associate Healthcare | 0.2 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 substantiated |
State inspection record1 substantiated
- Last evaluation
- September 26, 2024
- Evaluations on record
- 1
- Investigations substantiated
- 1 kept 7 years
- Inconclusive
- 1 kept 4 years
- Unsubstantiated
- 2 kept 3 years
Most recent evaluation (September 26, 2024, state report 59BH11)
MDH: “On September 23, 2024, through September 26, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a full survey at the above provider.”
Survey completed September 26, 2024: 14 correction orders
- Tag 250: 144G.20 Subdivision 1 Conditions Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the management officials who were in charge of the day-to-day operations; and responsible for the resident's assisted living services, understood all of the assisted living facility regulations when the licensee failed to develop or implement medication and treatment management policies.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the management officials who were in charge of the day-to-day operations; and responsible for the resident's assisted living services, understood all of the assisted living facility regulations when the licensee failed to develop or implement medication and treatment management policies. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The commissioner may refuse to grant a provisional license, refuse to grant a license as a result of a change in ownership, refuse to renew a license, suspend or revoke a license, or impose a conditional license if the owner, controlling individual, or [...]”
- Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
Details
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”
Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”
- Tag 510: 144G.41 Subd. 3 Infection control program Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program that complied with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control related to gloving, hand hygiene, and cough etiquette for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control program that complied with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control related to gloving, hand hygiene, and cough etiquette for one of two employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must establish and maintain an infection control program that complies with accepted health care, medical, and nursing standards for infection control. [...]”
- Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained the required content for two of two employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained the required content for two of two employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B, unlicensed personnel (ULP)-C). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”
- Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to maintain a written emergency preparedness plan (EPP) with all the required content as defined in Appendix Z. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”
Show all 14
- Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide interconnected smoke alarms throughout the facility.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide interconnected smoke alarms throughout the facility. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”
- Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the facility's physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”
- Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with required content. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”
Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”
- Tag 970: 144G.50 Subd. 5 Waivers of liability prohibited Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the assisted living contract did not include language waiving the facility's liability for health, safety, or personal property of a resident. This had the potential to affect all residents. [...]”
Rule cited: “The contract must not include a waiver of facility liability for the health and safety or personal property of a resident. [...]”
- Tag 1060: 144G.52 Subd. 9 Emergency relocation Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a written notice with the required content for an emergency relocation to the resident, legal representative, or designated representative and failed to provide the notification to the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) of the emergency relocation greater than four days for one of four residents (R2).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a written notice with the required content for an emergency relocation to the resident, legal representative, or designated representative and failed to provide the notification to the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) of the emergency relocation greater than four days for one of four residents (R2). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) A facility may remove a resident from the facility in an emergency if necessary due to a resident's urgent medical needs or an imminent risk the resident poses to the health or safety of another facility resident or facility staff member. [...]”
- Tag 1290: 144G.60 Subdivision 1 Background studies required Level 3, widespread scope, scope/level letter I · correction period: Immediate · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to re-run a COVID-19 expired background study (BGS)for one of five employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G) and failed to ensure to affiliate a BGS with the licensee's health facility identification number (HFID) for two of five employees (ULP-E, ULP-F).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to re-run a COVID-19 expired background study (BGS)for one of five employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-G) and failed to ensure to affiliate a BGS with the licensee's health facility identification number (HFID) for two of five employees (ULP-E, ULP-F). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Employees, contractors, and regularly scheduled volunteers of the facility are subject to the background study required by section 144.057 and may be disqualified under chapter 245C. [...]”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted a reassessment, not to exceed 14 calendar days from the initiation of services, for one of two residents (R2) and failed to ensure the RN conducted ongoing resident assessment and reassessment, not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last date of the assessment for two of two residents (R2, R3).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) conducted a reassessment, not to exceed 14 calendar days from the initiation of services, for one of two residents (R2) and failed to ensure the RN conducted ongoing resident assessment and reassessment, not to exceed 90 calendar days from the last date of the assessment for two of two residents (R2, R3). [...]”
Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”
- Tag 1800: 144G.71 Subd. 11 Prescribed and nonprescribed medication Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to determine whether the licensee shall require a prescription for all over-the counter (OTC) medications provided by the assisted living staff prior to managing the medication for one of four residents (R5).
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to determine whether the licensee shall require a prescription for all over-the counter (OTC) medications provided by the assisted living staff prior to managing the medication for one of four residents (R5). [...]”
Rule cited: “The assisted living facility must determine whether the facility shall require a prescription for all medications the provider manages. [...]”
- Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure medications were kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure medications were kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information. [...]”
Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”
From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.
Fines assessed by MDH
- Tag 1290 (144g.60 Subdivision 1 - Background Studies Required): $3,000.00
Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.
Substantiated investigations (state reports)
- April 30, 2026 · report HL343608782M · MDH finding: Substantiated, facility responsibility
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected a resident when they failed to provide supervision. Facility staff found the resident unresponsive and all life saving measures were ineffective.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated.”
“The facility was responsible for the maltreatment.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect substantiated (facility responsibility).
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was substantiated. The facility was responsible for the maltreatment. The resident had an extensive history of using street drugs (fentanyl, methamphetamine) which resulted in legal requirements for treatment. His legal commitment requirements included abstinence from street drugs or drugs not prescribed to him. Failure to comply with the commitment requirements would have required the resident to return to a more restrictive treatment program. The facility received this information prior to admitting him and determined they could provide the services he required. Three months after the resident admitted to the facility, he overdosed on street drugs, required lifesaving measures, and recovered. [...]”
Action taken by facility: “The facility called 911 then they found him unresponsive and attempted life saving measures.”
Action taken by MDH: “The responsible party will be notified of their right to appeal the maltreatment finding. The facility was found to be in noncompliance.”
Survey completed March 31, 2026: 2 correction orders
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 4, isolated scope, scope/level letter J · correction period: SEVEN (7) DAYS
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to conduct change of condition nursing assessments to address drug seeking behavior and street drug overdoses for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to conduct change of condition nursing assessments to address drug seeking behavior and street drug overdoses for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed. Because of this failure, the licensee did not implement further services to identify and mitigate the risks of R1's behavior. R1 died from a drug overdose (fentanyl, and methamphetamine). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.
MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and the facility was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”
Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 4, isolated scope, scope/level letter J · correction period: SEVEN (7) DAYS
Inconclusive investigations (1)
- December 1, 2022 · report HL34360001M · MDH finding: Inconclusive
Details
Allegation, as written: “The alleged perpetrator (AP) abused a resident when he punched him in the head.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was inconclusive.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: abuse inconclusive.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined abuse was inconclusive. Although facility administration reported observation of video footage of the AP hitting the resident, no video footage was available for review at the time of the onsite visit. The resident sustained no injury and the AP denied abusing the resident. Police were contacted at the time of the incident and no charges were filed.”
Action taken by facility: “The facility reported and investigated the incident. The facility provided additional training to staff in de-escalation techniques. The AP is no longer employed by the facility.”
Action taken by MDH: “None taken at this time.”
Survey completed August 29, 2022: no correction orders issued.
Unsubstantiated investigations (2)
- May 1, 2026 · report HL343606674C
Details
Survey completed March 31, 2026: 2 correction orders
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 4, isolated scope, scope/level letter J · correction period: SEVEN (7) DAYS
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to conduct change of condition nursing assessments to address drug seeking behavior and street drug overdoses for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to conduct change of condition nursing assessments to address drug seeking behavior and street drug overdoses for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed. Because of this failure, the licensee did not implement further services to identify and mitigate the risks of R1's behavior. R1 died from a drug overdose (fentanyl, and methamphetamine). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.
MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and the facility was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”
Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 4, isolated scope, scope/level letter J · correction period: SEVEN (7) DAYS
- April 30, 2026 · report HL343601721M · MDH finding: Not Substantiated
Details
Allegation, as written: “The facility neglected a resident when they failed to provide supervision. As a result, the resident broke the window in his room and cut his hand. The resident then started a fire in his room.”
“The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated.”
Summary: MDH looked into an allegation and found: neglect not substantiated.
MDH’s conclusion, as written: “The Minnesota Department of Health determined neglect was not substantiated. The incident was a sudden and unforeseen event. At the time of the incident an unlicensed personnel (ULP) was helping the resident with his "virtual" (video) medical appointment with a mental health physician. During the visit, the resident became angry, broke his window, and cut his hand. Law enforcement arrived at the facility and tried to get him medical care, but he continued to be aggressive and fought with them. The resident took a gas "torch" he had hidden in his room and started a fire, causing an evacuation.”
Action taken by facility: “No action taken.”
Action taken by MDH: “No further action taken at this time.”
Survey completed March 31, 2026: 2 correction orders
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 4, isolated scope, scope/level letter J · correction period: SEVEN (7) DAYS
Details
Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to conduct change of condition nursing assessments to address drug seeking behavior and street drug overdoses for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed.
MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to conduct change of condition nursing assessments to address drug seeking behavior and street drug overdoses for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed. Because of this failure, the licensee did not implement further services to identify and mitigate the risks of R1's behavior. R1 died from a drug overdose (fentanyl, and methamphetamine). [...]”
Rule cited: “(a) Residents who are not receiving any assisted living services shall not be required to undergo an initial nursing assessment. [...]”
- Tag 2360: 144G.91 Subd. 8 Freedom from maltreatment
Details
Summary: MDH found the facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment.
MDH’s finding, as written: “The facility failed to ensure one of one resident(s) reviewed (R1) was free from maltreatment. Findings include: The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) issued a determination maltreatment occurred, and the facility was responsible for the maltreatment, in connection with incidents which occurred at the facility. Please refer to the public maltreatment report for details.”
Rule cited: “Residents have the right to be free from physical, sexual, and emotional abuse; neglect; financial exploitation; and all forms of maltreatment covered under the Vulnerable Adults Act.”
- Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 (c-e) Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 4, isolated scope, scope/level letter J · correction period: SEVEN (7) DAYS
What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)
Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”
Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”
Level 4: “a violation harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury or death, or a violation that was likely to lead to serious injury or death”
Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”
Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”
Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”
Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.
What these terms mean
MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”
“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”
For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).
Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.
MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 4 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license, licensee CAPITAL HOME HEALTH CARE LLC
- License type
- Assisted Living Facility
- License number
- 424560
- License status
- Active
- Current license dated
- 2026-04-01
- Licensed capacity
- 4
- Licensee
- CAPITAL HOME HEALTH CARE LLC
- County
- Hennepin County
- Administrator/Authorized Agent
- Sadik Bashir
Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota
- Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 5.5 mi, nursing home 1.2 mi, pharmacy 1.6 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- North Memorial Health Hospital, Robbinsdale. 5.5 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 1 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Maranatha Care Center, Brooklyn Center. 1.2 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Elizjoseph Healthcare LLC, Brooklyn Center. 0.9 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walgreens. 1.6 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 55429 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Fresenius Kidney Care Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Center, 1.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita East River Road Dialysis, Fridley, 2.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Davita New Hope Dialysis Center, New Hope, 3.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 22 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55429.
North Memorial Home Hlth Hospc, office in Robbinsdale, 4.8 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Moments Hospice, office in Golden Valley, 7.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars)
Grace Hospice, office in Minneapolis, 7.5 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Hennepin Healthcare System Inc, Brooklyn Park. 1.5 miles away, straight line. 2 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in April 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
- Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
- Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
- Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection records | Sep 28, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | No plain statements of services found |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Capital Home Health Care provide?
Capital Home Health Care is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 4 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Capital Home Health Care?
No. We publish state licensing details for Capital Home Health Care but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Capital Home Health Care cost?
Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Capital Home Health Care does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Capital Home Health Care?
Use Capital Home Health Care's website, capitalhhc.com, or visit at 3516 73rd Avenue, Brooklyn Park, MN 55429.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid