Lilisity

Assisted Living

Angel Care Homes

7829 Hampshire Circle North, Brooklyn Park, MN 55445 · Map
Licensed for 5 residents · ANGEL CARE HOMES

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Angel Care Homes is a state-licensed assisted living community in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. It is licensed for 5 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
5 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living facility
$2,500 to $4,400/moTypical assisted living start in Hennepin County, from 18 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

0Substantiated investigations

Last evaluation: Nov 13, 2024. See the record

License

Active, 5 residents

Assisted Living Facility 425481, current license dated Jun 1, 2026. Licensee ANGEL CARE HOMES.

Nearest emergency room

6.0 miles

Maple Grove Hospital, rated 5 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Angel Care Homes this community5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Land of Lakes Residence0.0 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Optimal Loving Care0.1 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Heartfelt Care0.1 mi4Not publishedActive0 substantiated
Antique Gardens Senior Care0.3 mi5Not publishedActive0 substantiated
State inspection record0 substantiated
Last evaluation
November 13, 2024
Evaluations on record
2
Investigations substantiated
0 kept 7 years
Inconclusive
0 kept 4 years
Unsubstantiated
0 kept 3 years

Most recent evaluation (November 13, 2024, state report E7FG11)

MDH: “On November 12, 2024, through November 13, 2024, the Minnesota Department of Health conducted a survey at the above provider, and the following correction orders are issued.”

Survey completed November 13, 2024: 9 correction orders

  • Tag 480: 144G.41 Subd 1 (13) (i) (B) Minimum requirements Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Please refer to the FBEIR for any compliance dates
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code. This practice resulted in a level two violation (a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety) and was issued at a widespread scope (when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all the [...]”

    Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (B) food must be prepared and served according to the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules, chapter 4626; and”

  • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness (EP) plan with all the required content.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness (EP) plan with all the required content. This had the potential to affect all staff, visitors, and residents receiving services under the license. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

  • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 3, isolated scope, scope/level letter G · correction period: Immediate · fine: $3,000.00 assessed
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide emergency escape and rescue openings in complaince with Minnesota Fire Code, Minnesota Rules 7511.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide emergency escape and rescue openings in complaince with Minnesota Fire Code, Minnesota Rules 7511. This had the potential to directly affect one resident and all staff. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

  • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to install and maintain the portable fire extinguishers as required by statute.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to install and maintain the portable fire extinguishers as required by statute. This deficient condition had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

  • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7)
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

Show all 9
  • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content, and provide required training and drills.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, record review, and interview, the licensee failed to develop the fire safety and evacuation plan with the required content, and provide required training and drills. This had the potential to directly affect all residents, staff, and visitors. [...]”

    Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

  • Tag 1500: 144G.63 Subd. 5 Required annual training Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees received at least eight (8) hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment for one of two employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees received at least eight (8) hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment for one of two employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All staff that perform direct services must complete at least eight hours of annual training for each 12 months of employment. [...]”

  • Tag 1530: 144G.64 TRAINING IN DEMENTIA CARE REQUIRED Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employees completed at least two (2) hours of annual dementia care training for each 12 months of employment for one of two employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B).

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employees completed at least two (2) hours of annual dementia care training for each 12 months of employment for one of two employees (clinical nurse supervisor (CNS)-B). [...]”

    Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must meet the following training requirements: (1) supervisors of direct-care staff must have at least eight hours of initial training on topics specified under paragraph (b) within 120 working hours of the employment start [...]”

  • Tag 1890: 144G.71 Subd. 20 Prescription drugs Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
    Details

    Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure time sensitive medications were dated when opened for one of one resident (R1) with insulin.

    MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure time sensitive medications were dated when opened for one of one resident (R1) with insulin. [...]”

    Rule cited: “A prescription drug, prior to being set up for immediate or later administration, must be kept in the original container in which it was dispensed by the pharmacy bearing the original prescription label with legible information including the expiration or [...]”

From MDH’s letter: the letter says the facility is in substantial compliance.

Fines assessed by MDH

  • Tag 780 (144g.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) - Fire Protection And Physical Environment): $3,000.00

Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $3,000.00.

Earlier evaluations (1)
  • November 24, 2021: report RE8311 · 16 correction orders
    Details

    Survey completed February 1, 2022: 7 correction orders

    • Tag 485: 144G.41 Subd 1. (13) (i) (A) and (C) Minimum Requirements Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have menus prepared at least one week in advance and made available to all residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to have menus prepared at least one week in advance and made available to all residents. This had the potential to affect all two residents. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(13) offer to provide or make available at least the following services to residents: (i) at least three nutritious meals daily with snacks available seven days per week, according to the recommended dietary allowances in the United States Department of [...]”

    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records (re-issued) Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained the required orientation content and annual training for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D, licensed assisted living director (LALD)-A, and registered nurse (RN)-C) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained the required orientation content and annual training for three of three employees (unlicensed personnel (ULP)-D, licensed assisted living director (LALD)-A, and registered nurse (RN)-C) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

    • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment (re-issued) scope/level letter F
      Details

      MDH’s finding, as written: “No further action required.”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 1620: 144G.70 Subd. 2 Initial reviews, assessments, and monitoring Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive reassessment to include all areas identified on the uniform assessment tool for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) completed a comprehensive reassessment to include all areas identified on the uniform assessment tool for one of one resident (R1) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(c) Resident reassessment and monitoring must be conducted no more than 14 calendar days after initiation of services. [...]”

    Survey completed November 24, 2021: 9 correction orders

    • Tag 430: 144G.40 Subd. 2 Uniform checklist disclosure of services Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide a copy of the uniform disclosure of assisted living services and amenities (UDALSA) with the required content for two of two residents (R1 and R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to provide a copy of the uniform disclosure of assisted living services and amenities (UDALSA) with the required content for two of two residents (R1 and R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) All assisted living facilities must provide to prospective residents: (1) a disclosure of the categories of assisted living licenses available and the category of license held by the facility; (2) a written checklist listing all services permitted under [...]”

    • Tag 630: 144G.42 Subd. 6 Compliance with requirements for reporting ma Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure resident individual abuse prevention plans (IAPP) included statements of specific measures to be taken by staff to minimize the risk of abuse for two of two residents (R1 and R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure resident individual abuse prevention plans (IAPP) included statements of specific measures to be taken by staff to minimize the risk of abuse for two of two residents (R1 and R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) The facility must develop and implement an individual abuse prevention plan for each vulnerable adult. [...]”

    • Tag 650: 144G.42 Subd. 8 Employee records Level 2, isolated scope, scope/level letter D · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained the required orientation content for one of two employees (licensed assisted living director/unlicensed personnel ((LALD/ULP)-A) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure employee records contained the required orientation content for one of two employees (licensed assisted living director/unlicensed personnel ((LALD/ULP)-A) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must maintain current records of each paid employee, each regularly scheduled volunteer providing services, and each individual contractor providing services. [...]”

    • Tag 680: 144G.42 Subd. 10 Disaster planning and emergency preparedness Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content and to post an emergency preparedness plan prominently.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan with all the required content and to post an emergency preparedness plan prominently. This had the potential to affect all staff, visitors, and residents receiving services under the license. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) The facility must meet the following requirements: (1) have a written emergency disaster plan that contains a plan for evacuation, addresses elements of sheltering in place, identifies temporary relocation sites, and details staff assignments in the event [...]”

    • Tag 780: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (1) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms that complied with fire protection requirements.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide smoke alarms that complied with fire protection requirements. This had the potential to affect all residents staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(a) Each assisted living facility must comply with the State Fire Code in Minnesota Rules, chapter 7511, and: (1) for dwellings or sleeping units, as defined in the State Fire Code: (i) provide smoke alarms in each room used for sleeping purposes; (ii) [...]”

    Show all 9
    • Tag 790: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (2)-(3) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Seven (7) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide fire extinguishers that complied with fire protection requirements.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to provide fire extinguishers that complied with fire protection requirements. This had the potential to affect all residents staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(2) install and maintain portable fire extinguishers in accordance with the State Fire Code; (3) install portable fire extinguishers having a minimum 2-A:10-B:C rating within Group R-3 occupancies, as defined by the State Fire Code, located so that the travel [...]”

    • Tag 800: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (a) (4) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety and well-being of the residents.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation and interview, the licensee failed to maintain the physical environment in a continuous state of good repair and operation regarding the health, safety and well-being of the residents. This had the potential to affect all residents staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(4) keep the physical environment, including walls, floors, ceiling, all furnishings, grounds, systems, and equipment in a continuous state of good repair and operation with regard to the health, safety, comfort, and well-being of the residents in accordance [...]”

    • Tag 810: 144G.45 Subd. 2 (b)-(f) Fire protection and physical environment Level 2, widespread scope, scope/level letter F · correction period: Twenty-one (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to provide the required training to residents and staff for fire safety and evacuation and failed to provide evacuation maps.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee failed to provide the required training to residents and staff for fire safety and evacuation and failed to provide evacuation maps. This had the potential to affect all residents staff, and visitors. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(b) Each assisted living facility shall develop and maintain fire safety and evacuation plans. [...]”

    • Tag 1650: 144G.70 Subd. 4 Service plan, implementation, and revisions t Level 1, widespread scope, scope/level letter C · correction period: Twenty-One (21) days
      Details

      Summary: MDH found the licensee failed to ensure the resident service plan included the fees for services for two of two residents (R1 and R2) with records reviewed.

      MDH’s finding, as written: “Based on interview and record review, the licensee failed to ensure the resident service plan included the fees for services for two of two residents (R1 and R2) with records reviewed. [...]”

      Rule cited: “(f) The service plan must include: (1) a description of the services to be provided, the fees for services, and the frequency of each service, according to the resident's current assessment and resident preferences; (2) the identification of staff or [...]”

    Total fines assessed, as printed in the letter: $500.00.

What the levels and scopes mean (MDH’s words)

Level 1: “a violation that has no potential to cause more than a minimal impact on the resident and does not affect health or safety”

Level 2: “a violation that did not harm a resident's health or safety but had the potential to have harmed a resident's health or safety, but was not likely to cause serious injury, impairment, or death”

Level 3: “a violation that harmed a resident's health or safety, not including serious injury, impairment, or death, or a violation that has the potential to lead to serious injury, impairment, or death”

Isolated scope: “when one or a limited number of residents are affected or one or a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred only occasionally”

Pattern scope: “when more than a limited number of residents are affected, more than a limited number of staff are involved, or the situation has occurred repeatedly; but is not found to be pervasive”

Widespread scope: “when problems are pervasive or represent a systemic failure that has affected or has the potential to affect a large portion or all of the residents”

Summaries are ours and are marked “Summary”; quoted text is MDH’s own, shortened where marked [...]. Read the full reports at the links above or search every report on MDH’s site.

What these terms mean

MDH: “An evaluation is a process regulated by the division to ensure licensees comply with the laws, rules, and certifications for the type of care and services authorized under their license/certification.”

“An investigation may occur when the division is notified that care and services are not being provided by licensees as required by law. This may include allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial misuse.”

For maltreatment, Minnesota law defines substantiated as “a preponderance of the evidence shows that an act that meets the definition of maltreatment occurred” and inconclusive as “less than a preponderance of evidence to show that maltreatment did or did not occur” (Minn. Stat. 626.5572).

Correction orders, as MDH explains on each state form: “Tag numbers have been assigned to Minnesota State Statutes for Assisted Living Facilities.” “The letter in the left column is used for tracking purposes and reflects the scope and level issued pursuant to 144G.31 subd. 1, 2, and 3.” MDH adds that there is no requirement to submit a plan of correction for violations of Minnesota state statutes.

MDH keeps investigation results for seven years when allegations are substantiated, four years when inconclusive, and three years when unsubstantiated, so the counts cover different periods. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are evaluated and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, data as of September 28, 2026. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license, licensee ANGEL CARE HOMES
License type
Assisted Living Facility
License number
425481
License status
Active
Current license dated
2026-06-01
Licensed capacity
5
Licensee
ANGEL CARE HOMES
Administrator/Authorized Agent
Sadia Hashi

Source: Minnesota state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Administrator/Authorized Agent name from the Minnesota licensing record, as of Sep 9, 2026.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Minnesota

  • Elderly Waiver (EW), customized living services. Minnesota's Elderly Waiver, part of Medical Assistance (Minnesota Medicaid), can pay for "customized living" services, and a provider of those services must hold an assisted living license (or meet certain exceptions). You must qualify for Medical Assistance and need a nursing-home level of care. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 6.0 mi, nursing home 1.4 mi, pharmacy 0.5 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Maple Grove Hospital, Maple Grove. 6.0 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 5 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Saint Therese at Oxbow Lake, Brooklyn Park. 1.4 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Centerwell Home Health, Brooklyn Park. 1.5 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 0.5 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 55445 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita New Hope Dialysis Center, New Hope, 2.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fmc - Maple Grove Dialysis, Maple Grove, 3.3 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Fresenius Kidney Care Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Center, 3.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
16 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 55445.
North Memorial Home Hlth Hospc, office in Robbinsdale, 5.8 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Moments Hospice, office in Golden Valley, 7.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 1 of 5 stars)
Grace Hospice, office in Minneapolis, 8.8 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Hennepin Healthcare System Inc, Brooklyn Park. 0.6 miles away, straight line. 2 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively high. By hazard: inland flooding relatively high, wildfire very low, tornado relatively high, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The current license dates from 2026. Has the owner or operator changed recently?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division inspection recordsSep 28, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Angel Care Homes provide?

Angel Care Homes is licensed by the state of Minnesota for assisted living in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. Its licensed capacity is 5 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Angel Care Homes?

No. We publish state licensing details for Angel Care Homes but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Angel Care Homes cost?

Assisted Living in Hennepin County typically starts at $2,500 to $4,400 a month. Based on 18 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Angel Care Homes does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Angel Care Homes?

Visit Angel Care Homes at 7829 Hampshire Circle North, Brooklyn Park, MN 55445.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid