White Violet Adult Care Home II

Last inspection

November 20, 2025

Inspections

4, 11 deficiencies cited

Complaint inspections

2, 2 with deficiencies cited

Enforcement cases

2, $3,250 in civil penalties

• License active since 2024

Enforcement cases

• April 6, 2026: Civil Penalty $2,750 (complete); Notice of Enforcement (complete) case closed (complete)
• October 28, 2025: Civil Penalty $500 (complete) case closed (complete)

November 20, 2025: complaint inspection, 1 deficiency

• Personal Care Services R9-10-814.E
  Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a bell, intercom, or other mechanical means to alert employees to a resident’s needs or emergencies is available and accessible in a bedroom or residential unit being used by a resident receiving personal care services. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 22, 2025

November 3, 2025: complaint inspection, 6 deficiencies

• Administration R9-10-803.A.7
  Based on observation, documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to notify the Department according to A.R.S. § 36-425(I) when there was a change in the manager and identify the name and qualifications of the new manager. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to ensure the facility maintained a qualified manager.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 16, 2026
• Administration R9-10-803.B.3.a-b
  Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a designated caregiver was present on the assisted living facility's premises and accountable for the assisted living facility when the manager was not present on the assisted living facility premises. The deficient practice posed a risk as no individual was designated to act on behalf of the governing authority in the onsite management of the assisted living facility.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 4, 2025
• Personnel R9-10-806.B.4.a-b
  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the manager or a caregiver was present at an assisted living home when a resident was present in the assisted living home. The deficient practice posed a risk as no qualified employee was present to meet a resident's needs.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 5, 2025
• Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee included documentation required by this rule, for one of three personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as required information for a personnel member could not be verified.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 5, 2025
• Medical Records R9-10-811.A.1
  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure medical records were maintained for 1 of 2 residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the required information could not be verified.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 6, 2025
• Medication Services R9-10-817.B.3.a-c
  Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a medication administered to a resident was documented in the resident's medical record for all five residents. The deficient practice posed a risk as medication could not be verified as administered against a medication order.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 7, 2025

June 26, 2025: compliance (annual) inspection, 4 deficiencies

• Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
  Based on records review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that an employee provided documentation of freedom from infectious Tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for one of three sampled employees.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 27, 2025
• Administration R9-10-803.B.3.a-b
  Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a designated caregiver was present on the assisted living facility's premises and accountable for the assisted living facility when the manager was not present on the assisted living facility premises. The deficient practice posed a risk as no individual was designated to act on behalf of the governing authority in the onsite management of the assisted living facility.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 27, 2025
• Personal Care Services R9-10-814.B.1-2
  Based on record review and interview, the manager the manager failed to obtain a statement from the resident's primary care provider or other medical practitioner, who examined the resident at the onset of the condition, or within 30 calendar days before acceptance, and at least once every six months throughout the duration of the resident's condition, reviewed the assisted living facility's scope of services, and signed and dated a determination stating that the resident's needs can be met by the assisted living facility within the assisted living facility's scope of services and, for ...
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 28, 2025
• Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a-c
  Based on observations, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 30, 2025

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

• June 3, 2024: compliance (initial) inspection. No deficiencies were found during the off-site initial inspection for a change of ownership conducted on June 3, 2024.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.