Tucson Place, Assisted Living & Memory Care

Last inspection

January 15, 2026

Inspections

12, 47 deficiencies cited

Complaint inspections

12, 11 with deficiencies cited

Enforcement cases

9, $11,250 in civil penalties

• License active since 2018

Enforcement cases

• April 30, 2026: Civil Penalty $500 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
• January 22, 2026: Civil Penalty $750 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
• January 21, 2026: Civil Penalty $1,000 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
• September 9, 2025: Civil Penalty $4,450 (complete) case closed (complete)
• September 9, 2025: details on AZ Care Check case finalized

January 15, 2026: complaint inspection, 1 deficiency

• Administration R9-10-803.J.1-6
  Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, after the manager had a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 46-454, to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to immediately report the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of the resident, according to A.R.S. § 46-454. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to assess if there was an immediate health and safety concern for residents who resided in the assisted living facility.
  Approved

October 21, 2025: complaint inspection, 2 deficiencies

• Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
  Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to ensure the health care institution administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery that included initial training and continued competency training for one of five personnel sampled.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: December 23, 2025
• Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.D.1
  Based on documentation review and interview, when a resident had an accident, emergency, or injury that resulted in the resident needing medical services, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver or an assistant caregiver immediately notified the resident's emergency contact and primary care provider (PCP).
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: December 30, 2025

September 9, 2025: complaint inspection, 4 deficiencies

• Health care institutions; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; first aid; immunity; falls; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.B.2
  Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to provide appropriate first aid before the arrival of emergency medical services to a non-injured resident who had fallen, appeared to be uninjured, and was unable to reasonably recover independently.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 25, 2025
• Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.a-g
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or assistant caregiver assisted with activities of daily living according to the resident’s service plan, and/or documented services provided in the resident's medical record, for two of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 25, 2025
• Resident Rights R9-10-810.B.1
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity, respect, and consideration. The deficient practice violated a resident's rights.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 24, 2025
• Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.D.1
  Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver immediately notified a resident's primary care provider or emergency contact when a resident had an accident, emergency, or injury that resulted in the resident needing medical services. The deficient practice posed a risk as the standards expected of employees were not followed.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 24, 2025

May 14, 2025: complaint inspection, 4 deficiencies

• Administration R9-10-803.J.1-6
  Based on document review, record review, and interview, after the manager had a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 46-454, to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to report the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of the resident according to A.R.S. § 46-454. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was a delay in reporting, according to A.R.S. § 46-454, and designated standards were not followed.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 10, 2025
• Personnel R9-10-806.A.1.a-b
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided documentation of completion of a caregiver training program, as required in R9-10-806(A)(1)(b)(i). The deficient practice posed a risk if the individuals were not qualified to provide the required services.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 4, 2025
• Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an employee provided documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) on or before the date the individual began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility, as specified in R9-10-113, for three of nine employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 27, 2025
• Resident Rights R9-10-810.B.1
  Based on record review, document review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity, respect, and consideration.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 10, 2025

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

• April 12, 2024: complaint inspection. An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00208098, AZ00208181 and AZ00208072 was conducted on April 12, 2024, and no deficiencies were cited.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 99 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.