The Woodmark at Sun City

Last inspection

August 31, 2026

Inspections

17, 79 deficiencies cited

Complaint inspections

17, 12 with deficiencies cited

Enforcement cases

5, $8,750 in civil penalties

• No deficiencies cited at the last inspection (August 2026)
• License active since 2020

Enforcement cases

• March 25, 2026: Civil Penalty $3,250 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
• December 16, 2025: Civil Penalty $1,500 (complete); Notice of Enforcement (complete) case closed (complete)
• December 10, 2025: Civil Penalty $1,750 (complete) case closed (complete)
• February 20, 2025: Civil Penalty $1,500 (complete) case closed (complete)
• July 3, 2024: Civil Penalty $750 (complete) case closed (complete)

August 26, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 15 deficiencies

• Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
  Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery, for one of nine sampled staff. The deficient practice posed a risk if a staff member was not properly trained to assist a resident who had fallen and was unable to recover independently.
  Approved
• Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.1-2
  Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the health care institution’s chief administrative officer failed to ensure that the health care institution implemented tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities which included baseline screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consisted of assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious TB and determining if the individual had signs or symptoms of TB, for one of nine sampled employees. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents.
  Approved
• Administration R9-10-803.A.7
  Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the governing authority failed to notify the Department immediately when there was a change in the manager. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unaware as to whether the facility maintained a qualified manager.
  Approved
• Administration R9-10-803.A.9
  Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-411(C), for five of nine sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were a danger to a vulnerable population.
  Approved
• Administration R9-10-803.J.1-6
  Based on interview and documentation review, after having a reasonable basis to believe abuse occurred on the premises, the manager failed to document the items required by this rule. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
  Approved

April 8, 2026: complaint inspection, 4 deficiencies

• Administration R9-10-803.C.1.p.i-ii
  Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures were implemented to protect the health and safety of a resident that covered specific steps for the assisted living facility to respond to a resident’s complaint. The deficient practice posed a risk as policies and procedures reinforce and clarify standards expected of employees.
  Approved
• Personnel R9-10-806.A.5.a-c
  Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an assisted living facility had a manager, caregivers, and assistant caregivers with the qualifications, experience, skills, and knowledge necessary to meet the needs of a resident and ensure the health and safety of a resident. The deficient practice posed a risk as personnel did not react to a resident's needs or emergencies in a timely manner.
  Approved
• Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
  Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) before or within seven calendar days after the resident's date of occupancy and as specified in R9-10-113, for one of four sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents.
  Approved
• Environmental Standards R9-10-820.A.13.a-c
  Based on interview and documentation review, the manager failed to ensure equipment used at the assisted living facility was maintained in working order.
  Approved

March 6, 2026: complaint inspection, 1 deficiency

• Medical Records R9-10-811.C.13.a-d
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained documentation of medication administered to the resident that included the date, time, and dosage of administration, for two of four sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the health and safety of a resident, as emergency personnel would not have the correct health data to make decisions regarding a resident's treatment in an emergency, and the Department was provided false and misleading information.
  Approved

January 14, 2026: complaint inspection, 8 deficiencies

• Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.c
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a service plan that was established and documented that included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services being provided to the resident, for one of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk as a service plan guides a resident’s care.
  Plan of correction rejected
• Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a-d
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a service plan that was established and documented that, when initially developed and when updated, was signed and dated by all required parties, for one of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk if the required individuals did not acknowledge and agree to the services that were to be provided.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 15, 2026
• Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented the services provided to a resident in the resident's medical record, for two of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan and the Department was provided false or misleading information.
  Plan of correction rejected
• Medical Records R9-10-811.C.13.c
  Based on record review, interview, and observation, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained documentation of medication administered to the resident that included dosage, for two of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was provided false or misleading information.
  Plan of correction rejected
• Personal Care Services R9-10-814.E
  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a bell, intercom, or other mechanical means to alert employees to a resident’s needs or emergencies was available and accessible in a bedroom being used by a resident receiving personal care services. The deficient practice posed a risk if personnel could not react to a resident's needs or emergencies in a timely manner.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 31, 2026

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

• August 31, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00182760 conducted on August 31, 2026.
• December 15, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00089817 conducted on December 15, 2025.
• September 9, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00143474, 00144309, 00144407, 00140837, 00140825, 00137876, and 00134676 conducted on September 9, 2025.
• April 21, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00125804 and 00125957 conducted on April 21, 2025.
• April 9, 2024: complaint inspection. An on-site investigation of complaints AZ00207048, AZ00207304, and AZ00208414 were conducted on April 9, 2023, and no deficiencies were cited.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 138 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.