Lilisity

Assisted Living

Supreme Adult Care Home

3629 East Thames Circle, San Tan Valley, AZ 85140 · Map
Licensed for 5 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Supreme Adult Care Home is a state-licensed assisted living community in San Tan Valley, Arizona. It is licensed for 5 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
5 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living home-directed
$3,450 to $5,250/moTypical assisted living start in Arizona, from 88 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

26Deficiencies cited
4Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Sep 4, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 5 residents

Assisted Living Home-Directed AL7839H.

Nearest emergency room

2.8 miles

Banner Ironwood Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Supreme Adult Care Home this community5Not publishedActive26 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Almost Family Assisted Living0.1 mi10Not publishedActive17 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Cloister Assisted Living0.6 mi6Not publishedActive9 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
Ark of Noah Care Home0.9 mi5Not publishedActiveNo record
Arden Villa3.5 mi5Not publishedActive11 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
State inspection record26 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Last inspection
September 4, 2026
Inspections
4, 26 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
4, 4 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
1, $1,000 in civil penalties
  • License active since 2010

Enforcement cases

  • July 3, 2024: Civil Penalty $1,000 (complete) case closed (complete)

September 4, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 3 deficiencies

  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a manager or caregiver provided current documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training that included a demonstration of the individual's ability to perform CPR, before providing assisted living services, for one of two employees reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if an employee was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
    Approved
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.2.a-c
    Based on documentation review, record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan which was signed and dated by the resident or resident's representative and the manager for two of two residents sampled. This posed a health and safety risk if the resident or resident's representative and the manager did not acknowledge the services that were to be provided.
    Approved
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.i-iii
    Based on documentation review, record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan was reviewed and updated at least once every three months, for two of two residents sampled who received directed care services. The deficient practice posed a risk as a service plan reinforces and clarifies services to be provided to a resident.
    Approved

June 12, 2025: complaint inspection, 9 deficiencies

  • Administration R9-10-803.C.1.g
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 27, 2025
  • Quality Management R9-10-804.2.a
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 27, 2025
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 27, 2025
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.E.2
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 27, 2025
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 27, 2025
Show all 9
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.b
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 27, 2025
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.C.6.a-b
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 27, 2025
  • R9-10-819.A.11 R9-10-819.A.11
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 27, 2025
  • and 1 more in the report

February 3, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 9 deficiencies

  • Administration R9-10-803.C.1.g
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that policies and procedures were implemented to protect the health and safety of a resident that covered how a caregiver will respond to a resident's sudden, intense, or out-of control behavior to prevent harm to the resident or another individual.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Quality Management R9-10-804.2.a
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a documented report was submitted to the governing authority that included an identification of each concern about the delivery of services related to resident care.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that before or at time of acceptance of an individual submitted documentation that was dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by an assisted living facility and included whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints and was signed and dated by a medical practitioner, for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.E.2
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that within five working days after a resident's acceptance by the assisted living facility, the manager obtained the signature of the resident's representative on the documented agreement required in subsection (D), for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident, the resident's representative was not informed of the terms of residency.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident's written service plan when updated, was signed and dated by the resident's representative, for two of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the service plan was not developed to articulate decisions and agreements.
    Plan of correction accepted
Show all 9
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident's written service plan when updated, was signed and dated by the manager, for two of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the service plan was not developed to articulate decisions and agreements.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.C.6.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan included documentation of the resident's weight or documentation from a medical practitioner stating weighing the resident was contraindicated, for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to the residents.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • R9-10-819.A.11 R9-10-819.A.11
    Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility were maintained in a locked area and inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • and 1 more in the report

May 29, 2024: complaint inspection, 5 deficiencies

  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that for two of two residents sampled, a standardized emergency responder patient information form as described in subsection A of this section, was completed and maintained for each resident. The deficient practiced posed a risk as required patient information was not prepared in case of an emergency.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 9, 2024
  • Administration R9-10-803.B.3.b
    Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a qualified caregiver, who had been designated in writing, was present on the assisted living facility's premises and accountable for the assisted living facility when the manager was not present on the assisted living facility premises. The deficient practice posed a risk as no individual was designated to act on behalf of the governing authority in the onsite management of the assisted living facility.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 9, 2024
  • Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.c.ix
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee included documentation of compliance with the requirements in A.R.S. § 36-411, for one of two personnel records sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if E2 was a danger to a vulnerable population.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 9, 2024
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.a
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided a resident with the assisted living services in the resident's service plan, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the service plan to direct services was not followed.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 9, 2024
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.C.10
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained the resident's service plan and updates, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as services stated in the residents' service plans were not available.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 9, 2024

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Home-Directed
License number
AL7839H
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
5

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.8 mi, nursing home 10.8 mi, pharmacy 2.2 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Banner Ironwood Medical Center, Queen Creek. 2.8 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Apache Junction Health Center, Apache Junction. 10.8 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Inbalance Home Health, LLC, San Tan Valley. 2.2 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 2.2 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 85140 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
032610 Southeast Valley Dialysis (Fmc), Queen Creek, 6.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Mountain Vista Dialysis Center Of Arizona, Mesa, 11.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032578 Apache Junction Dialysis (Fmc), Apache Junction, 13.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Hospice
61 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85140.
Integrity Hospice Care, LLC, office in Gold Canyon, 8.7 miles away, straight line
Azorna Hospice And Palliative Care, office in Mesa, 10.5 miles away, straight line
Hospice At Home Of Arizona, LLC, office in Mesa, 12.9 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Banner Urgent Care Services LLC, San Tan Valley. 2.2 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in September 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Supreme Adult Care Home provide?

Supreme Adult Care Home is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in San Tan Valley, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 5 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Supreme Adult Care Home?

No. We publish state licensing details for Supreme Adult Care Home but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Supreme Adult Care Home cost?

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Supreme Adult Care Home does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Supreme Adult Care Home?

Visit Supreme Adult Care Home at 3629 East Thames Circle, San Tan Valley, AZ 85140.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid