Renata's Home for the Elderly

Last inspection

September 14, 2026

Inspections

2, 16 deficiencies cited

Complaint inspections

2, 2 with deficiencies cited

Enforcement cases

1, $500 in civil penalties

• License active since 2009

Enforcement cases

• October 10, 2025: Civil Penalty $500 (complete) case closed (complete)

September 14, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 11 deficiencies

• Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
  Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the health care institution failed to administer initial training and continued competency training in fall prevention and fall recovery for one of two employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential risk to the health and safety of a resident if E3 could not respond to the needs of a resident.
  Approved
• Administration R9-10-803.J.1-6
  Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, after having a reasonable basis to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to report the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation according to A.R.S. § 46-454, and initiate an investigation of the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation and document the following information within five working days, for one of the four residents reviewed.
  Approved
• Personnel R9-10-806.A.5.a-c
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that an assisted living facility has a manager, caregivers, and assistant caregivers with the qualifications, experience, skills, and knowledge necessary to meet the needs of a resident and ensure the health and safety of a resident. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet a resident's needs.
  Approved
• Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a personnel record for each employee included the requisite components in R9-10-806.C.1.a-c, for four of the six personnel reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as required information could not be verified for E1, E4, E5, and E7.
  Approved
• Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented the services provided in the resident’s medical record, for two of the two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan.
  Approved

June 30, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 5 deficiencies

• Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a-c
  Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that there was a means of exiting the facility that controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 10, 2025
• Food Services R9-10-817.C.2
  Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that food was protected from potential contamination.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 7, 2025
• Food Services R9-10-817.C.5
  Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a refrigerator used by an assisted living facility to store food or medication contains a thermometer, accurate to plus or minus 3° F, placed at the warmest part of the refrigerator.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 3, 2025
• Food Services R9-10-818.C.1
  Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure food was free from spoilage, filth, or other contamination and was safe for human consumption.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 3, 2025
• Environmental Standards R9-10-819.A.1.b
  Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure the premises were free from a condition or situation that may cause a resident or other individual to suffer physical injury.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 4, 2025

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 8 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.