Assisted Living
R & D Marathon Assisted Living Home V
12802 North 57th Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85254 · Map
Licensed for 10 residents
R & D Marathon Assisted Living Home V is a state-licensed assisted living community in Scottsdale, Arizona. It is licensed for 10 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Aug 27, 2026. See the record
License
Active, 10 residents
Assisted Living Home-Directed AL12845H.
Nearest emergency room
3.4 miles
Abrazo Scottsdale Campus, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R & D Marathon Assisted Living Home V this community | 10 | Not published | Active | 56 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case | |
| Leti's Home at Scottsdale | 0.3 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Caring for Loved Ones, East Sharon Drive | 0.5 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 0 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases |
| Agave Manor | 0.5 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 8 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
| At Home Scottsdale | 0.5 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 0 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases |
State inspection record56 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
- Last inspection
- August 27, 2026
- Inspections
- 4, 56 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 2, 1 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 1, $1,000 in civil penalties
- License active since 2024
Enforcement cases
- December 15, 2025: Civil Penalty $1,000 (complete) case closed (complete)
August 27, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 27 deficiencies
- Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the health care institution failed to develop and administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery that included initial training and continued competency training for five of five personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
Approved - Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager of an assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-420.04(A)(1-9). The deficient practice posed a risk if the emergency responder was not aware of critical health information for a resident.
Approved - Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the health care institution failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities, including, for each individual who is employed by or admitted to the health care institution, baseline screening on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter that consisted of assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious TB and determining if the individual had signs or symptoms of TB, annually providing training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB to individuals employed by ...
Approved - Quality Management R9-10-804.3
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the report required in subsection (2) was maintained for at least 12 months after the date the report was submitted to the governing authority.
Approved - Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained of the caregivers and assistant caregivers working each day, including the hours worked by each. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no documentation to identify the staff that was present each day to ensure the health and safety of residents.
Approved
Show all 9
- Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
Based on observation, record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record was established and maintained for each employee as required for two of five personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the required information could not be verified for E3 and E4, and false and misleading information was provided to the Department.
Approved - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that before or at the time of acceptance, an individual submitted documentation that was dated within 90 calendar days before the resident was accepted by the assisted living facility which included if an individual was requesting or was expected to receive supervisory care services, personal care services, or directed care services; whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints; and was dated and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, ...
Approved - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.E.1-4
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that within five working days after a resident's acceptance by the assisted living facility, the documented agreement was signed by the resident's representative, the resident's legal guardian, or another individual who has been designated by the individual under A.R.S. § 36-3221 to make health care decisions on the individual's behalf, for two of four residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident and the required individuals were not informed of the terms of residency.
Approved - and 19 more in the report
October 30, 2025: compliance (annual) inspection, 29 deficiencies
- Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager of an assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-420.04(A)(1-9). The deficient practice posed a risk if the emergency responder was not aware of critical health information for a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 30, 2025 - Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities, including annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis. The deficient practice posed a risk as the caregiver received no organized instruction or information related to TB surveillance.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 31, 2025 - Opioid Prescribing and Treatment R9-10-120.F.4.a-c
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an individual authorized to administer opioids documented in the resident's medical record an identification of the resident's need for the opioid before the opioid was administered, and the effect of the opioid administered, for one of four residents receiving an opioid and not considered to be end-of-life.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 30, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained of the caregivers and assistant caregivers working each day, including the hours worked by each. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no documentation to identify the staff that was present each day to ensure the health and safety of residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 30, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee included documentation of evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB), as specified in R9-10-113, for two of four personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 1, 2025
Show all 9
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.9
Based on observation, record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver received orientation that was specific to the duties to be performed before providing assisted living services to a resident, for four of four employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet residents' needs.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 1, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.B.3
Based on documentation review, observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that as part of the policies and procedures required in R9-10-803(C)(1)(h), a plan was implemented to ensure that the manager or a caregiver was available as back-up to provide assisted living services to a resident if the caregiver assigned to work was not available or not able to provide the required assisted living services. The deficient practice posed a risk to the health and safety of the residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 31, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.B.4.a-b
Based on documentation review, observation, interview, and record review, the manager failed to ensure that at least the manager or a caregiver was present at an assisted living home when a resident was present in the assisted living home. The deficient practice posed a risk as no qualified employee was present to meet a resident's needs.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 31, 2025 - and 21 more in the report
Inspections with no deficiencies listed
- July 10, 2024: initial monitoring inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site abbreviated initial follow-up inspection conducted on July 10, 2024.
- March 29, 2024: complaint, compliance (initial) inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site initial inspection conducted on March 29, 2024.
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 10 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Home-Directed
- License number
- AL12845H
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 10
- County
- Maricopa County
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.4 mi, nursing home 1.3 mi, pharmacy 1.2 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Abrazo Scottsdale Campus, Phoenix. 3.4 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Phoenix Mountain Post Acute, Phoenix. 1.3 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Devotion Home Health Care LLC, Phoenix. 1.6 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- CVS Pharmacy. 1.2 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 85254 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Usrc Northeast Phoenix, Phoenix, 3.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032530 Desert Valley Dialysis (Fmc), Phoenix, 3.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Scottsdale Kidney Center, LLC, Phoenix, 3.7 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 2 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 86 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85254.
Trifinity Hospice Inc, office in Phoenix, 1.4 miles away, straight line
Elevate Hospice And Palliative Care LLC, office in Scottsdale, 1.9 miles away, straight line
Savior Hospice, office in Phoenix, 2.1 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 2 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Banner Urgent Care Services LLC, Scottsdale. 2.4 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Zone X: 0.2% annual chance (500-year) flood area (moderate risk). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively low. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively low, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in August 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does R & D Marathon Assisted Living Home V provide?
R & D Marathon Assisted Living Home V is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Scottsdale, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 10 residents.
Does Lilisity rate R & D Marathon Assisted Living Home V?
No. We publish state licensing details for R & D Marathon Assisted Living Home V but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does R & D Marathon Assisted Living Home V cost?
Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. R & D Marathon Assisted Living Home V does not publish its prices.
How do I contact R & D Marathon Assisted Living Home V?
Visit R & D Marathon Assisted Living Home V at 12802 North 57th Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85254.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid