Lilisity

Assisted Living

Penzi Care Home

43448 West Wild Horse Trail, Maricopa, AZ 85138 · Map
Licensed for 6 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Penzi Care Home is a state-licensed assisted living community in Maricopa, Arizona. It is licensed for 6 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
6 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living home-directed
$3,450 to $5,250/moTypical assisted living start in Arizona, from 88 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

35Deficiencies cited
3Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Aug 5, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 6 residents

Assisted Living Home-Directed AL11601H.

Nearest emergency room

13.5 miles

Exceptional Community Hospital - Maricopa.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Penzi Care Home this community6Not publishedActive35 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
Careheart 24 Assisted Living0.3 mi5Not publishedActive8 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Kt Homes0.5 mi4Not publishedActiveNo record
Maxcare Assisted Living Home1.4 mi5Not publishedActive9 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
Homestead Manor Assisted Living1.5 mi6Not publishedActiveNo record
State inspection record35 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
Last inspection
August 5, 2026
Inspections
3, 35 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
3, 3 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
3, $4,750 in civil penalties
  • License active since 2020

Enforcement cases

August 5, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 21 deficiencies

  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information in Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) 36-420.04.A.1-9 for two of the two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if the emergency responder was unaware of the resident's critical health information.
    Approved
  • Quality Management R9-10-804.3
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the report required in subsection (2) was maintained for at least 12 months after the date the report was submitted to the governing authority.
    Approved
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver’s or assistant caregiver’s skills and knowledge are verified and documented before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provides physical health services; and according to policies and procedures for one of the two personnel reviewed.
    Approved
  • Personnel R9-10-806.B.4.a-b
    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that at least the manager or a caregiver is present at an assisted living home when a resident was present in the assisted living home. The deficient practice posed a risk, as no qualified employee was present to meet a resident's needs.
    Approved
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) before or within seven calendar days after the resident’s date of occupancy and as specified in R9-10-113, for one of two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
    Approved
Show all 9
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the facility to include whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, dated and signed by a physician, registered nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or physician assistant, for one of two residents reviewed.
    Approved
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.D.1-10
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that before or at the time of an individual’s acceptance, there was a documented residency agreement with the assisted living facility that included the individual’s name; terms of occupancy including: date of occupancy or expected date of occupancy, resident responsibilities; and responsibilities of the assisted living facility; a list of the services to be provided by the assisted living facility to the resident; a list of the services available from the assisted living facility at an additional fee or charge; for an ...
    Approved
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a-d
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a service plan established that when initially developed and when updated, was signed and dated by the resident or resident’s representative, the manager, and, if a review was required in subsection (A)(3)(d), the nurse or medical practitioner who reviewed the service plan, for two of the two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if the service plan was not developed to articulate decisions and agreements.
    Approved
  • and 13 more in the report

December 23, 2024: complaint inspection, 3 deficiencies

  • Medical Records R9-10-811.A.1
    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the manager failed to ensure a medical record was established and maintained for each resident according to A.R.S. Title 12, Chapter 13, Article 7.1 for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the required information could not be verified. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer requested a list of resident who had been discharged from the facility within the last year. The list of discharged residents include R3's name. 2.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a.i-ii
    Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a means of exiting the facility controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed the front door and a back door in the common area leading to the backyard.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • R9-10-816.F.1 R9-10-816.F.1
    Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication was stored in a separate locked room, closet, cabinet, or self-contained unit used only for medication storage. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of residents with access to the unsecured medication. Findings include: 1. During the environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a medication cup with a single medication pill on the dinning table. 2.
    Plan of correction accepted

November 6, 2024: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 11 deficiencies

  • Quality Management R9-10-804.3
    Based on documention review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the quality management report required in R9-10-804(2) and the supporting documentation for the report was maintained for at least 12 months after the date the report was submitted to the governing authority. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to determine substantial compliance during the inspection. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's policies and procedures revealed a policy titled, "Quality Management Policy." The policy stated, "C. Organization...2.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
    Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained for at least 12 months of the caregivers working each day, including the hours worked by each. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to determine substantial compliance. Findings include: 1. A review of the daily staffing schedule for November 2024 revealed evidence of documentation of the caregivers and assistant caregivers working each day. However, the schedule did not indicate which hours each employee worked. 2.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.c.iii
    Based on documentation review, record review, observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee included documentation of the individual's completed in-service education required by policies and procedures, for two of three personnel members sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of facility policy and procedures (reviewed September 1, 2022) revealed a policy titled, "In-Service Education Policy." The policy stated "Staff are required to have a minimum of 6 hours of continuing education in a 12-month period..." 2.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's written service plan was signed and dated by the resident or resident's representative for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no evidence R3 or R3's representative was involved and agreed to the services to be provided to R3. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's medical record revealed R3 was admitted in 2024. Further review of R3's medical record revealed a service plan dated August 2, 2024.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.a-g
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver provides a resident with assisted living services in the resident's service plan, and documented the services provided in the resident's medical record for two of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed a current service plan for personal care services.
    Plan of correction accepted
Show all 9
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.A.1
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medical record was maintained for each resident according to A.R.S. Title 12, Chapter 13, Article 7.1. The deficient practice posed a risk as required information could not be verified for one resident. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. Title 12, Chapter 13, Article 7.1 states, "Unless otherwise required by statute or by federal law, a health care provider shall retain the original or copies of a patient's medical records as follows: 1.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • R9-10-818.A.3.a-d R9-10-818.A.3.a-d
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation of the disaster plan review required in subsection (A)(2) included the date and time of the disaster plan review, the name of each employee or volunteer participating in the disaster plan review, a critique of the disaster plan review, and if applicable recommendations for improvement. Findings included: 1. A review of documentation revealed no evidence of a disaster plan review. 2. In an interview, E1 reported to be unable to locate the disaster plan review.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • R9-10-818.A.4 R9-10-818.A.4
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift at least once every three months and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement a disaster plan. Findings include: 1. A review of facility staffing schedules did not reveal any evidence of documentation of how may shifts employees worked each day. 2. In an interview, E1 advised employees worked two twelve hour shifts, from 7:00 a.m. through 7:00 p.m., and 7 p.m. through 7:00 a.m. 2.
    Plan of correction accepted
  • and 3 more in the report

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 6 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Home-Directed
License number
AL11601H
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
6

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 13.5 mi, nursing home 16.5 mi, pharmacy 1.3 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Exceptional Community Hospital - Maricopa, Maricopa. 13.5 miles away, straight line. Location approximate.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Caring House, Sacaton. 16.5 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Stokes Home Health Care, Chandler. 15.3 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
CVS Pharmacy. 1.3 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 85138 as metropolitan (metropolitan high commuting).
Dialysis within 15 miles
033503 Gila River Dialysis West, Laveen, 14.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032579 Sun Lakes Dialysis (Fmc), Sun Lakes, 14.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Hospice
49 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85138.
Traditions Health, office in Chandler, 18.2 miles away, straight line
A Tlc Hospice LLC, office in Chandler, 18.9 miles away, straight line
Hospice Compassus-Casa Grande, office in Casa Grande, 20.1 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Sjhmc Physician Services, Chandler. 18.6 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Zone X: 0.2% annual chance (500-year) flood area (moderate risk). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in August 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Penzi Care Home provide?

Penzi Care Home is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Maricopa, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 6 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Penzi Care Home?

No. We publish state licensing details for Penzi Care Home but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Penzi Care Home cost?

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Penzi Care Home does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Penzi Care Home?

Visit Penzi Care Home at 43448 West Wild Horse Trail, Maricopa, AZ 85138.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid