Lilisity

Assisted Living

Peaceful Haven Assisted Living L L C

8742 East Vicksburg Street, Tucson, AZ 85710 · Map
Licensed for 9 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Peaceful Haven Assisted Living L L C is a state-licensed assisted living community in Tucson, Arizona. It is licensed for 9 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
9 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living home-directed
$3,450 to $5,250/moTypical assisted living start in Arizona, from 88 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

52Deficiencies cited
2Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Jul 2, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 9 residents

Assisted Living Home-Directed AL13327H.

Nearest emergency room

3.1 miles

St Joseph'S Hospital, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Peaceful Haven Assisted Living L L C this community9Not publishedActive52 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Desert Haven Adult Care Home0.1 mi10Not publishedActive6 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Aloha Assisted Living Home0.6 mi5Not publishedActive10 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Abella Manor Senior Care0.6 mi10Not publishedActiveNo record
The Oasis at Fellowship Square Tucson0.8 mi60Not publishedActive26 deficiencies, 4 enforcement cases
State inspection record52 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Last inspection
July 2, 2026
Inspections
5, 52 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
2, 2 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
2, $4,000 in civil penalties
  • License active since 2025

Enforcement cases

  • September 21, 2026: Civil Penalty $2,500 (in process); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case finalized
  • June 29, 2026: Civil Penalty $1,500 (in process); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case finalized

July 2, 2026: complaint inspection, 8 deficiencies

  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.D
    Based on documentation review and interview, assisted living home failed to maintain a copy of the document provided to the emergency responder and documentation of the actions required by subsection B of this section for a period of two years after the date of an emergency, for one of one sampled resident for whom emergency responders were contacted by the facility on behalf of a resident.
    Approved
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.D.2.a-c
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure, by the time of acceptance, a residency agreement included the date of occupancy or expected date of occupancy, for one of two sampled residents.
    Approved
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.E.1-4
    Based on record review and interview, before or within five working days after a resident's acceptance, the manager failed to obtain the signature of the resident, the resident's representative, the resident's legal guardian, or another individual designated to make health decisions, for one of two sampled residents.
    Approved
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.e.i.1-4
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan for a resident who required behavioral care included the psychosocial interactions or behaviors for which the resident required assistance, psychotropic medications ordered for the resident, planned strategies and actions for changing the resident's psychosocial interactions or behaviors, and goals for changes in the resident's psychosocial interactions or behaviors, for one of one sampled resident who required behavioral care.
    Approved
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.iii
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's service plan was updated at least once every three months for a resident receiving directed care services, for one of one sampled resident receiving directed care services.
    Approved
Show all 8
  • Behavioral Care R9-10-812.1-3
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure, for one of one sampled resident who required behavioral care, a behavioral health professional or medical practitioner, within 30 calendar days before acceptance of the resident or before the resident began receiving behavioral care, reviewed the assisted living facility’s scope of services, and signed and dated a determination stating that the resident’s need for behavioral care could be met by the assisted living facility within the assisted living facility’s scope of services.
    Approved
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.A
    Based on record review and interview the manager failed to ensure a resident's representative was designated for a resident who was unable to direct self-care, for one of one sampled resident receiving directed care services.
    Approved
  • Medication Services R9-10-817.B.3.b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for one of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
    Approved

February 26, 2026: complaint inspection, 14 deficiencies

  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.2.a-b
    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an assistant caregiver interacted with residents only under the supervision of a manager or caregiver. The deficient practice posed a risk if the individuals were not qualified to provide the required services.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 6, 2026
  • Personnel R9-10-806.B.4.a-b
    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure at least the manager or a caregiver was present at the assisted living home when a resident was present in the assisted living home. The deficient practice posed a risk as the uncorrected violation shows a pattern of noncompliance to ensure the health and safety of residents and posed a risk as no qualified employee was present to meet a resident's needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 1, 2026
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.D.1-10
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure, before or at the time of an individual's acceptance by an assisted living facility, there was a documented residency agreement for one of two sampled residents, and failed to ensure a documented residency agreement included the manager's signature and date, for two of two sampled residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 6, 2026
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.b
    Based on record review and interview, for one of one sampled residents with a service plan, the manager failed to ensure a service plan included the level of service a resident was expected to receive.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 13, 2026
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.e.i.1-4
    Based on record review and interview, for one of one sampled residents who required behavioral care, the manager failed to ensure a service plan included the psychosocial interactions or behaviors for which the resident required assistance, the psychotropic medications ordered for the resident, planned strategies and actions for changing the resident’s psychosocial interactions or behaviors, and goals for changes in the resident’s psychosocial interactions or behaviors.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 6, 2026
Show all 9
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.e.ii
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the service plan for a resident who required behavioral care was reviewed by a medical practitioner or behavioral health practitioner, for one of one sampled residents who required behavioral care.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 6, 2026
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan was signed by the resident or resident's representative, when the service plan was initially developed or when updated, for one of one sampled resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 6, 2026
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented the services provided in a resident's medical record, for one of two sampled residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 13, 2026
  • and 6 more in the report

February 11, 2026: compliance (annual) inspection, 30 deficiencies

  • Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the health care institution failed to develop and administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery, for two of two sampled staff.
    Approved
  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
    Based on documentation review and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident which included the information in subsection A of this section, for two of two sampled residents.
    Approved
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.10
    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure the health, safety, or welfare of a resident was not placed at risk of harm. The deficient practice posed a risk to health and safety.
    Approved
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.2.a-b
    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an assistant caregiver interacted with residents only under the supervision of a manager or caregiver. The deficient practice posed a risk if the individuals were not qualified to provide the required services.
    Approved
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an assistant caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the assistant caregiver provided physical health services, for one of one sampled assistant caregivers. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet a resident's needs.
    Approved
Show all 9
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.5.a-c
    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the facility had a manager, caregivers, and assistant caregivers with the qualifications, experience, skills, and knowledge necessary to meet the needs of the residents and to ensure the health and safety of the residents. The deficient practice posed a risk as no qualified staff were present to provide the required services.
    Approved
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained for at least 12 months after the last date on the documentation of the caregiver's and assistant caregivers working each day.
    Approved
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.9
    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an assistant caregiver's orientation was documented before the assistant caregiver provided assisted living services to a resident, for one of one sampled assistant caregivers.
    Approved
  • and 22 more in the report

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

  • May 21, 2025: initial monitoring inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site abbreviated initial follow-up inspection conducted on May 21, 2025.
  • January 27, 2025: compliance (initial) inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site initial inspection conducted on January 27, 2025.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 9 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Home-Directed
License number
AL13327H
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
9

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.1 mi, nursing home 2.6 mi, pharmacy 0.3 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
St Joseph'S Hospital, Tucson. 3.1 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Haven of Saguaro Valley, Tucson. 2.6 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Tucson Medical Home Health, Tucson. 1.4 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walmart Pharmacy. 0.3 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 85710 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Tucson East Dialysis, Tucson, 3.0 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032643 East Tucson (Fmc), Tucson, 4.0 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Swan Dialysis, Tucson, 5.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice
36 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85710.
Positive Nature Hospice LLC, office in Tucson, 2.2 miles away, straight line
Haven Hospice, office in Tucson, 3.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Charter Healthcare Of Tucson, LLC, office in Tucson, 3.5 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Banner-University Medical Group, Tucson. 1.6 miles away, straight line. 4 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively high, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in July 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: no FEMA wildfire rating of moderate or higher here
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Peaceful Haven Assisted Living L L C provide?

Peaceful Haven Assisted Living L L C is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Tucson, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 9 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Peaceful Haven Assisted Living L L C?

No. We publish state licensing details for Peaceful Haven Assisted Living L L C but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Peaceful Haven Assisted Living L L C cost?

Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Peaceful Haven Assisted Living L L C does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Peaceful Haven Assisted Living L L C?

Visit Peaceful Haven Assisted Living L L C at 8742 East Vicksburg Street, Tucson, AZ 85710.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid