Paradise Valley Senior Living

Last inspection

September 10, 2026

Inspections

22, 72 deficiencies cited

Complaint inspections

21, 16 with deficiencies cited

Enforcement cases

9, $22,840 in civil penalties

• License active since 2008

Enforcement cases

• September 28, 2026: Civil Penalty $5,450 (in process); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case finalized
• July 20, 2026: Civil Penalty $4,100 (in process); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case finalized
• June 22, 2026: Civil Penalty $1,000 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
• June 1, 2026: Civil Penalty $250 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
• July 9, 2025: Civil Penalty $2,250 (complete) case closed (complete)

September 10, 2026: complaint inspection, 1 deficiency

• Administration R9-10-803.A.3.b.i-ii
  Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the governing authority failed to designate, in writing, a manager who had either a certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-446.04(C), or a temporary certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under A.R.S. § 36-446.06. The deficient practice posed a risk if the assisted living facility was unable to ensure compliance with applicable Rules.
  Approved

September 8, 2026: complaint inspection, 4 deficiencies

• Administration R9-10-803.A.3.b.i-ii
  Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the governing authority failed to designate, in writing, a manager who had either a certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-446.04(C), or a temporary certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under A.R.S. § 36-446.06. The deficient practice posed a risk if the assisted living facility was unable to ensure compliance with applicable Rules.
  Approved
• Directed Care Services R9-10-815.E.1-2
  Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a bell, intercom, or other mechanical means to alert employees to a resident's needs or emergencies was available in a bedroom being used by a resident receiving directed care services. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
  Approved
• Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.D.2.a-f
  Based on interview, record review, and documentation review, the manager failed to ensure that when a resident had an accident, emergency, or injury that resulted in the resident needing medical services, a caregiver or assistant caregiver documented the date and time of the accident, emergency, or injury; a description of the accident, emergency, or injury; the names of individuals who observed the accident, emergency, or injury; the actions taken by the caregiver or assistant caregiver; the individuals notified by the caregiver or assistant caregiver; and any action taken to prevent the ...
  Approved
• Environmental Standards R9-10-820.A.13.a-c
  Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure equipment at the facility was maintained in working order. The deficient practice posed a risk to the health and safety of residents.
  Approved

September 1, 2026: complaint inspection, 4 deficiencies

• Administration R9-10-803.A.3.b.i-ii
  Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the governing authority failed to designate, in writing, a manager who had either a certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-446.04(C), or a temporary certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under A.R.S. § 36-446.06. The deficient practice posed a risk if the assisted living facility was unable to ensure compliance with applicable Rules.
  Approved
• Administration R9-10-803.A.9
  Based on documentation review, observation, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411, for one of four employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employee was a danger to a vulnerable population.
  Approved
• Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a-c
  Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who did not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort that provided access to an outside area that monitored or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident.
  Approved
• Environmental Standards R9-10-820.A.11
  Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the facility were stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to residents with access to the poisonous or toxic materials.
  Approved

August 6, 2026: complaint inspection, 8 deficiencies

• Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
  Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a personnel record for each employee included initial training and continued competency training in fall prevention and fall recovery for five of six employee records sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the caregiver received no organized instruction or information related to physical health services provided to residents.
  Approved
• Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
  Based on record review and interview, the health care institution failed to ensure that the health care institution implemented tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities for three of six employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents.
  Approved
• Administration R9-10-803.A.3.b.i-ii
  Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the governing authority failed to designate, in writing, a manager who had either a certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-446.04(C), or a temporary certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under A.R.S. § 36-446.06. The deficient practice posed a risk if the assisted living facility was unable to ensure compliance with applicable Rules.
  Approved
• Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
  Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver’s or assistant caregiver’s skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provided physical health services. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to ensure the health and safety of a resident.
  Approved
• Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a-d
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan that was signed and dated by the resident or resident's representative and the manager, for seven of nine resident records sampled. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk if the resident, or resident's representative, and the manager did not acknowledge the services that were to be provided.
  Approved

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

• December 24, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00152295, 00145589, 00142992, 00142915, 00141976, 00138252, 00134619, 00154175, and 00154264 conducted on December 24, 2025.
• June 3, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00127676 conducted on June 3, 2025.
• December 17, 2024: change of service inspection. No deficiencies were found during the off-site modification for a name change completed on December 18, 2024.
• September 27, 2024: complaint inspection. An on-site investigation of complaints AZ00216518 and AZ00216550 was conducted on September 27, 2024, and no deficiencies were cited.
• September 12, 2024: complaint inspection. An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00215871 was conducted on September 12, 2024 and no deficiencies were cited.
• July 2, 2024: complaint inspection. An on-site investigation of complaints AZ00212510, AZ00211688, and AZ00210362 was conducted on July 2, 2024, and no deficiencies were cited.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 118 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.