Lilisity

Assisted Living

Paradise Valley Premier Care

3324 East Oraibi Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85050 · Map
Licensed for 10 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Paradise Valley Premier Care is a state-licensed assisted living community in Phoenix, Arizona. It is licensed for 10 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
10 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living home-directed
$3,400 to $4,900/moTypical assisted living start in Maricopa County, from 65 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

23Deficiencies cited
3Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Jul 10, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 10 residents

Assisted Living Home-Directed AL11943H.

Nearest emergency room

1.8 miles

Abrazo Scottsdale Campus, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Paradise Valley Premier Care this community10Not publishedActive23 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
D & V Assisted Living0.2 mi5Not publishedActiveNo record
Desert Gem Assisted Living Facility0.3 mi9Not publishedActive31 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Viki's Assisted Living Home0.4 mi5Not publishedActiveNo record
Tatum Glen Assisted Living Home0.5 mi10Not publishedActive1 deficiency, 0 enforcement cases
State inspection record23 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
Last inspection
July 10, 2026
Inspections
3, 23 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
3, 2 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
0
  • No deficiencies cited at the last inspection (July 2026)
  • License active since 2021

May 26, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 5 deficiencies

  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
    Based on record review and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9 for two out of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was not prepared in case of an emergency.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 28, 2026
  • Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
    Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to ensure that the health care institution established, documented, and implemented tuberculosis infection control activities that included annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 29, 2026
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.9
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411, for one of four employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employee was a danger to a vulnerable population.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 29, 2026
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.C.17
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident’s medical record contained documentation of notification of the resident of the availability of vaccination for influenza and pneumonia for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 28, 2026
  • Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.F.4.a-b
    Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a smoke detector was installed in each bedroom. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk if a smoke detector was needed during an emergency.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 30, 2026

October 10, 2024: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 18 deficiencies

  • Administration R9-10-803.C.3
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the facility's policies and procedures were reviewed at least once every three years and updated as needed. The deficient practice posed a risk as policies and procedures dictate the care and services to be provided for residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 14, 2024
  • Quality Management R9-10-804.1.a-e
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the facility's policies and procedures for a quality management (QM) program were implemented. The deficient practice posed a risk as a quality management program documents and tracks the necessary information required to effectively evaluate and manage services provided.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 14, 2024
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.2.b
    Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, for one of two assistant caregivers reviewed, the manager failed to ensure an assistant caregiver interacted with residents under the supervision of a manager or caregiver. The deficient practice posed a risk as the individual was not qualified to provide the required services unsupervised.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 14, 2024
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
    Based on documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained of the caregivers working each day, including the hours worked by each. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to residents if the facility did not maintain staffing schedules, with documentation of facility staffing coverage for residents, and an identification of the caregivers who provided services.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 14, 2024
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a
    Based on record review and interview, for two of three residents reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan included the signature and date from the resident or resident's representative. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk if the resident or the resident's representative did not acknowledge the services to be provided.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 14, 2024
Show all 9
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
    Based on record review, and interview, for one of three residents reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver documented the services provided in the resident's medical record. The deficient practice posed a risk if services were not provided for residents and/or the services provided could not be verified.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 14, 2024
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.C.3.b.i-ii
    Based on record review and interview, for two of three residents reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained a copy of the health care power of attorney (POA). The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility did not have the required legal documentation of the resident's responsible party.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 14, 2024
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.B.1
    Based on record review and interview, for two of three residents reviewed, who were confined to a bed or chair, and unable to ambulate, even with assistance, the manager failed to ensure the facility did not accept or retain a resident who was confined to a bed or chair because of an inability to ambulate even with assistance, unless the facility obtained a written determination from a medical practitioner, upon acceptance, that stated the resident's needs could be met by the facility, and the resident's needs were within the facility's scope of services.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 7, 2024
  • and 10 more in the report

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

  • July 10, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00115699 and 00115653 conducted on July 10, 2026.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 10 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Home-Directed
License number
AL11943H
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
10

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.8 mi, nursing home 1.3 mi, pharmacy 0.6 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Abrazo Scottsdale Campus, Phoenix. 1.8 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Acacia Health Center, Phoenix. 1.3 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Centerwell Home Health, Phoenix. 2.1 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
CVS Pharmacy. 0.6 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 85050 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
032530 Desert Valley Dialysis (Fmc), Phoenix, 1.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Usrc Northeast Phoenix, Phoenix, 2.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Scottsdale Kidney Center, LLC, Phoenix, 4.7 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Hospice
58 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85050.
Az Sunset Hospice, office in Phoenix, 1.1 miles away, straight line
Lavender Hospice, office in Phoenix, 1.3 miles away, straight line
Agave Hospice And Palliative Care, office in Phoenix, 2.8 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Honorhealth Medical Group, LLC, Phoenix. 2.1 miles away, straight line. 2 geriatric medicine doctors listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk very low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Zone X: 0.2% annual chance (500-year) flood area (moderate risk). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: very low. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding very low, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave relatively high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in May 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  4. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  5. What fees are charged at move-in?
  6. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  7. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  8. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  9. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
  10. Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Paradise Valley Premier Care provide?

Paradise Valley Premier Care is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Phoenix, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 10 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Paradise Valley Premier Care?

No. We publish state licensing details for Paradise Valley Premier Care but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Paradise Valley Premier Care cost?

Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Paradise Valley Premier Care does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Paradise Valley Premier Care?

Visit Paradise Valley Premier Care at 3324 East Oraibi Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85050.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid