Medina House

Last inspection

December 31, 2025

Inspections

3, 17 deficiencies cited

Complaint inspections

3, 3 with deficiencies cited

Enforcement cases

1, $1,250 in civil penalties

• License active since 2011

Enforcement cases

• April 6, 2026: Civil Penalty $1,250 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)

December 31, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 13 deficiencies

• Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.D
  Based on documentation review and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a copy of the document provided to the emergency responder as prescribed in A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9, for any resident who required the assistance of emergency responders. The deficient practice posed a risk as the designated standards were not followed and the department was unable to ensure compliance with the applicable statute.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 2, 2026
• Health care institutions; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; first aid; immunity; falls; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.B.1
  Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the assisted living home failed to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in accordance with its certification training for CPR before the arrival of emergency medical services, to a resident who was nonresponsive or had a cessation of normal respiration, in accordance with that resident's advance directives, for one of one applicable resident. The deficient practice resulted in the death of the resident.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 30, 2026
• Administration R9-10-803.K.1
  Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to provide written notification to the Department of a resident’s death, if the resident’s death was required to be reported according to A.R.S. § 11-593, within one working day after the resident’s death, for one of one applicable resident.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: December 31, 2026
• Quality Management R9-10-804.2.a-b
  Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a documented report was submitted to the governing authority that included an identification of each concern about the delivery of services related to resident care, and any change made or action taken as a result of the identification of a concern about the delivery of services related to resident care. The deficient practice posed a risk as a quality management program documents the necessary information required to effectively manage services provided.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 5, 2026
• Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
  Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that documentation of the caregivers and assistant caregivers schedule and days worked, including the hours worked by each, had been completed and was accurate. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no documentation to identify if qualified staff were present each day to ensure the health and safety of residents.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 2, 2026

February 3, 2025: complaint inspection, 2 deficiencies

• Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.c
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: December 11, 2025
• R9-10-817.A.1.d R9-10-817.A.1.d
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: December 11, 2025

December 11, 2024: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 2 deficiencies

• Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.c
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan that accurately included the amount, type, and frequency of assisted living services being provided to the resident, for two of two sampled residents.
  Plan of correction accepted
• R9-10-817.A.1.d R9-10-817.A.1.d
  Based on documentation review, observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a food substitution was documented on the posted menu. This posed a health and safety risk if residents are not provided meals that meet their nutritional needs.
  Plan of correction accepted

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 10 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.