Lilisity

Assisted Living

Litchfield Park Assisted Living & Memory Care

18244 West Medlock Drive, Litchfield Park, AZ 85340 · Map
Licensed for 10 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Litchfield Park Assisted Living & Memory Care is a state-licensed assisted living community in Litchfield Park, Arizona. It is licensed for 10 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
10 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living home-directed
$3,400 to $4,900/moTypical assisted living start in Maricopa County, from 65 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

14Deficiencies cited
5Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Sep 26, 2025. See the record

License

Active, 10 residents

Assisted Living Home-Directed AL13042H.

Nearest emergency room

6.5 miles

Abrazo West Campus, rated 2 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Litchfield Park Assisted Living & Memory Care this community10Not publishedActive14 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Leana Assisted Living Home0.4 mi10Not publishedActive2 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
Golden Touch Home Care0.4 mi5Not publishedActiveNo record
Holistic Harmony Home Care0.7 mi5Not publishedActive4 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Ability Assisted Living0.8 mi5Not publishedActive11 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
State inspection record14 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Last inspection
September 26, 2025
Inspections
7, 14 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
5, 3 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
2, $1,500 in civil penalties
  • License active since 2024

Enforcement cases

  • December 23, 2025: Civil Penalty $1,000 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
  • May 8, 2025: Civil Penalty $500 (complete) case closed (complete)

September 26, 2025: complaint inspection, 2 deficiencies

  • Medication Services R9-10-817.B.3.a-c
    Based on record review and interview, the manager did not ensure medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order and was documented in the resident’s medical record for one of two resident's sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 27, 2025
  • Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.D.1
    Based on record review and interview, when a resident had an accident, emergency, or injury that resulted in the resident needing medical services, the manager did not ensure the caregiver immediately notified the resident's emergency contact and primary care provider for one of two residents sampled.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 28, 2025

September 16, 2025: complaint inspection, 8 deficiencies

  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.D
    Based on documentation review and interview, the assisted living home/center failed to maintain a copy of the document provided to the emergency responder for a period of two years after the date of the emergency for one of one residents sampled who required an emergency response. This deficient practice posed a risk that the emergency responder may not have access to critical health information for the resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the caregiver documented the services provided in the resident's medical record, for eight of eight residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025
  • Resident Rights R9-10-810.B.1
    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the manager failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity, respect, and consideration. The deficient practice posed a risk as a resident's rights were violated.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025
  • Resident Rights R9-10-810.B.2.i
    Based on documentation review, observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident was not subjected to a restraint. The deficient practice posed a potential for psychological distress and physical injury.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.A.5
    Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record was protected from loss, damage, or unauthorized use. The deficient practice posed a risk of protected and sensitive resident health information being disclosed without the resident's consent or knowledge.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025
Show all 8
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a-c
    Based on documentation review, observation, and interviews, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility for a resident who did not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, which provided access to a secured outside area that monitored or alerted employees of the resident’s egress from the facility. This deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025
  • Medication Services R9-10-817.A.2.a-c
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that if a verbal order for a resident's medication was received from a medical practitioner by the assisted living facility, the verbal order was documented in the resident's medical record, for two of seven residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk if a resident received medication and the Department was unable to verify an order for the medication.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025
  • Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.D.2.a-f
    Based on documentation review, record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure when a resident had an incident that resulted in the resident needing medical services, a caregiver documented the date and time of the incident; a description of the incident; the names of individuals who observed the incident; the action taken by the caregiver; the individuals notified by the caregiver; and any action taken to prevent the incident from occurring in the future, for one of one residents reviewed who had an incident that resulted in the resident needing medical services.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 17, 2025

March 13, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 4 deficiencies

  • Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.1-2
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure individuals employed by the facility completed Documentation of a negative Mantoux skin test or other tuberculosis screening test that Is recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), for two of four sampled personnel records.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 13, 2025
  • Administration R9-10-803.B.3.a-b
    The manager failed to ensure a caregiver was designated in writing who would be present on the premises and accountable for the assisted living facility when the manager was not present on the premises.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 13, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
    Based on record review, documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure before providing personal care services or directed care services to a resident, a caregiver provided documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training certification specific to adults, for two of four caregivers sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if an employee was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 20, 2025
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.A.2.a-c
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an entry in a resident's medical record was not changed to make the initial entry illegible, for one of three sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the health and safety of residents if the documentation was not accurate and legible.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 13, 2025

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

  • May 1, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00127350 conducted on May 1, 2025.
  • April 15, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00126443 conducted on April 15, 2025.
  • August 20, 2024: initial monitoring inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site abbreviated initial follow-up inspection conducted on August 20, 2024.
  • June 12, 2024: compliance (initial) inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site initial inspection conducted on June 12, 2024.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 10 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Home-Directed
License number
AL13042H
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
10

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 6.5 mi, nursing home 5.3 mi, pharmacy 2.0 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Abrazo West Campus, Goodyear. 6.5 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 2 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Sun Health La Loma Care Center, Litchfield Park. 5.3 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Care Partners Health Services, Inc., Avondale. 7.9 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Fry's Pharmacy. 2.0 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 85340 as metropolitan (metropolitan high commuting).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Dialysis Care At Palm Valley, Goodyear, 5.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032622 Goodyear Dialysis (Fmc), Goodyear, 6.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032580 Palm Valley Dialysis (Fmc), Goodyear, 6.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Hospice
52 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85340.
Eternity Hospice & Palliative Care, office in Phoenix, 9.2 miles away, straight line
Canyon Home Care & Hospice, office in Glendale, 10.2 miles away, straight line
Savior Hospice, office in Surprise, 10.8 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Heelex 2 LLC, Surprise. 11.3 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Zone X: 0.2% annual chance (500-year) flood area (moderate risk). (FEMA flood map)
Wildfire risk to homes
In Citrus Park, AZ, risk to homes is greater than 32% of communities in Arizona and 69% of communities nationwide. USDA rates the whole town or city, not this address. (USDA Forest Service, Wildfire Risk to Communities, April 2026)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively high. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively high, wildfire relatively high, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in September 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  4. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  5. What fees are charged at move-in?
  6. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  7. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  8. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  9. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
  10. Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026See above
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Litchfield Park Assisted Living & Memory Care provide?

Litchfield Park Assisted Living & Memory Care is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Litchfield Park, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 10 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Litchfield Park Assisted Living & Memory Care?

No. We publish state licensing details for Litchfield Park Assisted Living & Memory Care but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Litchfield Park Assisted Living & Memory Care cost?

Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Litchfield Park Assisted Living & Memory Care does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Litchfield Park Assisted Living & Memory Care?

Visit Litchfield Park Assisted Living & Memory Care at 18244 West Medlock Drive, Litchfield Park, AZ 85340.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid