Assisted Living
Legacy Village of Salt River
8170 North 90th Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 · Map
Licensed for 235 residents
Legacy Village of Salt River is a state-licensed assisted living community in Scottsdale, Arizona. It is licensed for 235 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
Starting prices the community publishes, with the date we checked each one and a link to where it is published. Care charges are usually added after an assessment.
| Care | Starting at | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| Assisted Living | $3,960 /mo | Oct 12, 2026 |
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What Legacy Village of Salt River says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
- Offers respite or short-term stays.
Short-term respite care options
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026) - Provides transportation.
Transportation services
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026) - 3 meals a day.
Three restaurant-inspired meals per day, plus snacks
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026) - Pets allowed.
Pet friendly options available
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026) - Apartment types named: studio, one-bedroom, two-bedroom.
We offer studio, one-bedroom and two-bedroom floor plans.
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Jul 7, 2026. See the record
License
Active, 235 residents
Assisted Living Center-Directed AL11712C.
Nearest emergency room
1.9 miles
Honorhealth Scottsdale Shea Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legacy Village of Salt River this community | 235 | $3,960/mo | Active | 26 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases | |
| Mccormick Ranch Assisted Living Home | 1.3 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Starlight Assisted Living | 1.3 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Mosaic Garden Memory Care at Scottsdale | 1.5 mi | 86 | Not published | Active | 35 deficiencies, 6 enforcement cases |
| Blue Lakes Assisted Living | 1.7 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 5 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases |
State inspection record26 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
- Last inspection
- July 7, 2026
- Inspections
- 6, 26 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 6, 4 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 3, $3,250 in civil penalties
- License active since 2021
Enforcement cases
- August 26, 2026: Civil Penalty $250 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
- June 7, 2024: Civil Penalty $1,750 (complete) case closed (complete)
- March 14, 2024: Civil Penalty $1,250 (complete) case closed (complete)
July 7, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 1 deficiency
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB), as specified in R9-10-113, for one of ten personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 8, 2026
August 19, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 2 deficiencies
- Food Services R9-10-818.C.4.a
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure foods requiring refrigeration were maintained at 41° F or below. The deficient practice posed a risk for potential food borne illnesses.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 25, 2025 - Environmental Standards R9-10-820.A.11
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility were inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 25, 2025
April 18, 2024: complaint inspection, 10 deficiencies
- Administration R9-10-803.C.1.g
Based on record review, documentation review and interview, the manager failed to establish and document policies and procedures to protect the health and safety of a resident, that covered how a caregiver would respond to a resident's sudden, intense, or out-of-control behavior to prevent harm to the resident or another individual. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to residents, if the facility failed to have established policies and procedures, and employees were not instructed on managing a resident's aggressive behaviors, to ensure the safety of residents and others.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 15, 2024 - Administration R9-10-803.J.2
Based on record review, documentation review and interview, the administrator failed to report an allegation of abuse according to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 46-454. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to assess if there was an immediate health and safety concern for residents who resided in the assisted living facility.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 15, 2024 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, for three of six caregivers reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided services. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to residents if a caregiver did not have the documented skills and knowledge to provide services for residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 15, 2024 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, for three of six caregivers reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB), as required by R9-10-113. The deficient practice posed a potential health and safety risk of TB exposure to residents and staff.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 15, 2024 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.9
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, for two of six caregivers reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver received orientation specific to the duties to be performed by the caregiver. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to residents if a caregiver was not oriented, as required.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 15, 2024
Show all 9
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
Based on record review, and interview, for three of six caregivers reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided documentation of first aid training (FA) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training (CPR) certification specific to adults which included a demonstration. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to residents if caregivers did not have the required FA and CPR training.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 15, 2024 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.b
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, for two of two residents reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan to include the level of service the resident was expected to receive. The deficient practice posed a risk as the service plan did not reinforce and clarify services to be provided to a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 15, 2024 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a-d
Based on record review and interview, for two of two residents reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan which was signed and dated by the resident or resident's representative, the manager, and if a review was required, by the nurse or medical practitioner (MP) who reviewed the service plan. This posed a health and safety risk if the resident or resident's representative, the manager, and the resident's MP or nurse did not acknowledge the services that were to be provided.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 15, 2024 - and 2 more in the report
February 5, 2024: complaint inspection, 13 deficiencies
- Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the health care institution failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk as organized instruction and information related to resident care and safety was not implemented.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 15, 2024 - Administration R9-10-803.C.1.w
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, for two of six residents reviewed, who suffered an incident, the manager failed to implement the facility's incident reporting policy. The deficient practice posed a risk to the health and safety of residents if incident reporting policies and procedures were not implemented, and documentation of incident reports did not include all relevant information, notifications, and actions implemented to prevent recurrence.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 15, 2024 - Administration R9-10-803.J.1-6
Based on record review, and interview, the administrator failed to report and document an alleged incident of abuse according to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 46-454. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to assess if there was an immediate health and safety concern for residents who resided in the assisted living facility.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 15, 2024 - Administration R9-10-803.K.1
Based on documentation review, record review and interview, for two resident deaths, the manager failed to provide written notification to the Department of a resident's death, which was unexpected according to A.R.S. § 11-593.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 15, 2024 - Quality Management R9-10-804.1.a-e
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the facility's policies and procedures for a quality management (QM) program were documented and implemented. The deficient practice posed a risk as a quality management program documents and tracks the necessary information required to effectively evaluate and manage services provided.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 15, 2024
Show all 9
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
Based on record review, and interview, for five of six caregivers reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services or behavioral health services, and according to policies and procedures. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to residents, if a caregiver did not have the documented skills and knowledge to provide care and services for a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 15, 2024 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.9
Based on record review, and interview, for four of six caregivers reviewed, the manager failed to ensure that before providing assisted living services, a caregiver received orientation specific to the duties to be performed by the caregiver. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to residents if a caregiver did not receive the required orientation.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 15, 2024 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
Based on record review and interview, for one of six residents reviewed, the manager failed to ensure before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation, signed and dated by a Physician, Registered nurse practitioner, Registered nurse, or Physician Assistant, which included whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints. The deficient practice posed a safety risk, if residents were not appropriately assessed on acceptance.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 15, 2024 - and 5 more in the report
Inspections with no deficiencies listed
- April 30, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00166730 and 00158847 on April 30, 2026.
- October 28, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00148872 conducted on October 28, 2025.
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 235 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Center-Directed
- License number
- AL11712C
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 235
- County
- Maricopa County
- Executive Director
- Lara Bowles
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Executive Director name from public records we reviewed, as of Oct 12, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.9 mi, nursing home 1.5 mi, pharmacy 0.2 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Honorhealth Scottsdale Shea Medical Center, Scottsdale. 1.9 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Advance Health Care of Scottsdale, Scottsdale. 1.5 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Thrive Skilled Pediatric Care, Scottsdale. 0.4 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Integrity Rx Specialty Pharmacy. 0.2 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 85258 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Davita Desert Mountain Dialysis Center, Scottsdale, 1.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
032648-Fmc Old Town Scottsdale, Scottsdale, 4.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
032594 Salt River Dialysis Center (Fmc), Scottsdale, 4.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 48 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85258.
Traditions Health, office in Scottsdale, 0.6 miles away, straight line
Care Plus Hospice Care, LLC, office in Scottdale, 1.8 miles away, straight line
Infinity Hospice Care, LLC, office in Scottsdale, 2.0 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Scottsdale Inpatient Specialists Plc, Scottsdale. 1.9 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- Wildfire risk to homes
- In Maricopa County, AZ, risk to homes is greater than 14% of communities in Arizona and 79% of communities nationwide. USDA rates the whole county, not this address. (USDA Forest Service, Wildfire Risk to Communities, April 2026)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively high. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding very high, wildfire relatively moderate, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in July 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- Your published starting price is a base rate. What would the total monthly cost be for my parent's needs?
- How much have prices gone up in each of the last three years?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | See above |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Legacy Village of Salt River provide?
Legacy Village of Salt River is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Scottsdale, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 235 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Legacy Village of Salt River?
No. We publish state licensing details for Legacy Village of Salt River but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Legacy Village of Salt River cost?
Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The starting prices it publishes are in the Prices section on this page.
How do I contact Legacy Village of Salt River?
Use Legacy Village of Salt River's website, legacyretire.com/communities/legacy-village-of-salt-river, or visit at 8170 North 90th Street, Scottsdale, AZ 85258.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid