Assisted Living
Las Palomas Senior Living
9050 East Brown Road, Mesa, AZ 85207 · Map
Licensed for 111 residents
Las Palomas Senior Living is a state-licensed assisted living community in Mesa, Arizona. It is licensed for 111 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
Starting prices the community publishes, with the date we checked each one and a link to where it is published. Care charges are usually added after an assessment.
| Care | Starting at | Checked |
|---|---|---|
| Assisted Living | $4,265 /mo | Oct 12, 2026 |
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What Las Palomas Senior Living says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
- Provides transportation.
Scheduled transportation
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026) - Pets allowed.
And, We’re Pet Friendly!
(page, checked Oct 15, 2026) - Apartment types named: studio, one-bedroom, two-bedroom.
View our senior apartment floor plans available in studio, 1 bedroom & 2 bedroom layouts.
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026) - One-time fee: charged.
One-Time Fee
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Aug 5, 2026. See the record
License
Active, 111 residents
Assisted Living Center-Directed AL11154C.
Nearest emergency room
3.5 miles
Banner Baywood Medical Center, rated 2 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Las Palomas Senior Living this community | 111 | $4,265/mo | Active | 24 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases | |
| Doctor's Choice Assisted Living | 0.1 mi | 19 | Not published | Active | 14 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases |
| Mountain Vista Manor | 0.5 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 4 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases |
| Fountain Home Assisted Living | 1.1 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 0 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases |
| Heritage Village Bldg 2 | 1.2 mi | 192 | Not published | Active | No record |
State inspection record24 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
- Last inspection
- August 5, 2026
- Inspections
- 12, 24 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 10, 5 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 3, $3,750 in civil penalties
- License active since 2019
Enforcement cases
- March 2, 2026: Civil Penalty $1,500 (complete); Notice of Enforcement (complete) case closed (complete)
- November 4, 2025: Civil Penalty $250 (complete) case closed (complete)
- October 6, 2025: Civil Penalty $2,000 (complete) case closed (complete)
August 5, 2026: complaint inspection, 1 deficiency
- Administration R9-10-803.J.1-6
Based on documentation review and interview, after having a reasonable basis to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to immediately report the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation to Adult Protective Services (APS), for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 31, 2026
January 8, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 8 deficiencies
- Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager of an assisted living center who contacted emergency responders on behalf of a resident failed to provide to the emergency responders a written document that included all information required in A.R.S. § 36-420.04. The deficient practice posed a risk if the emergency responder was not aware of critical health information for the resident. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 25, 2026 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
Based on record review and interview the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver who was expected to have more than eight hours per week of direct interaction with residents, provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis on or before the date the individual began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility and as specified in R9-10-113.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 12, 2026 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that before providing assisted living services to a resident, a manager provided current documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training certification specific to adults. The deficient practice posed a risk if an employee was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 9, 2026 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis before or within seven calendar days after the resident's admit date of occupancy and as specified in R9-10-113. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 12, 2026 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.1
Based on record review and interview the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a service plan that was established, documented and implemented that was completed no later than 14 calendar days after the resident's date of acceptance. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no service plan to direct services to be provided to a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 9, 2026
Show all 8
- Memory Care Services R9-10-816.A.1
Based on record review, document review and interview the manager failed to ensure that an assisted living facility authorized to provide directed care services had policies and procedures for memory care services that were established, documented, and implemented to cover the requirements in R9-10-816.A.1.a. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 9, 2026 - Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.A.5.a
Based on document review and interview the manager failed to ensure that an evacuation drill for employees and residents was conducted at least once every six months. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 19, 2026 - Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.E.3
Based on document review and interview the manager failed to ensure that a fire inspection was conducted by a local fire department or State Fire Marshal before licensing and according to the time-frame established by the local fire department or the State Fire Marshal. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 8, 2026
August 18, 2025: complaint inspection, 7 deficiencies
- Health care institutions; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; first aid; immunity; falls; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.B.2
Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to provide appropriate first aid before the arrival of emergency medical services to a non-injured resident who had fallen, appeared to be uninjured, and was unable to reasonably recover independently.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025 - Administration R9-10-803.A.9
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-411(C), for one of five sampled employees. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were a danger to a vulnerable population.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an assistant caregiver’s skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the assistant caregiver provided physical health services, for two of two sampled assistant caregivers. The deficient practice posed a risk if an assistant caregiver did not have the skills and knowledge necessary to meet a resident's needs.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.5.a-c
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an assisted living facility had caregivers and assistant caregivers with the qualifications, experience, skills, and knowledge necessary to meet the needs of a resident and ensure the health and safety of a resident. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to ensure the health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
Based on documentation review,record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) on or before the date the individual began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility as specified in Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-113, for one of three sampled caregivers. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
Based on documentation review, interview, and record review, the manager failed to maintain a personnel record which included all items required by this rule, for one of five sampled employees. The deficient practice posed a risk as required information could not be verified.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025 - Resident Rights R9-10-810.B.1
Based on documentation review and interview,, the manager failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity, respect, and consideration. The deficient practice posed a risk to the health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025
June 17, 2025: complaint inspection, 1 deficiency
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
Based on the record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services for one of the seven caregivers sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees did not have the skills and knowledge required to ensure the health and safety of residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 16, 2025
Inspections with no deficiencies listed
- July 8, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00175469 conducted on July 8, 2026.
- May 13, 2026: modification inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site modification for a bed increase completed on May 13, 2026.
- April 15, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00165744 and 00165846 conducted on April 15, 2026.
- November 6, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00149383 conducted on November 6, 2025.
- September 4, 2025: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00127287, 00127401, and 00143135 conducted on September 4, 2025.
- January 23, 2025: complaint inspection. An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00222386 was conducted on January 23, 2025, and no deficiencies were cited.
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 111 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Center-Directed
- License number
- AL11154C
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 111
- County
- Maricopa County
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.5 mi, nursing home 2.8 mi, pharmacy 0.1 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Banner Baywood Medical Center, Mesa. 3.5 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 2 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Springdale Village Post Acute, Mesa. 2.8 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Aegis Homecare, Inc, Mesa. 4.6 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- CVS Pharmacy. 0.1 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 85207 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- 032509 East Valley Dialysis (Fmc), Mesa, 3.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
032578 Apache Junction Dialysis (Fmc), Apache Junction, 3.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Davita Power Road Dialysis Pd, Mesa, 3.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 83 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85207.
Blue Sky Hospice, Inc, office in Mesa, 1.2 miles away, straight line
Aegis Hospice, Inc., office in Mesa, 4.6 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Azorna Hospice And Palliative Care, office in Mesa, 5.2 miles away, straight line - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Banner Urgent Care Services LLC, Mesa. 5.7 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Zone X: 0.2% annual chance (500-year) flood area (moderate risk). (FEMA flood map)
- Wildfire risk to homes
- In Mesa, AZ, risk to homes is greater than 40% of communities in Arizona and 78% of communities nationwide. USDA rates the whole town or city, not this address. (USDA Forest Service, Wildfire Risk to Communities, April 2026)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively moderate, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in August 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- Your published starting price is a base rate. What would the total monthly cost be for my parent's needs?
- How much have prices gone up in each of the last three years?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | See above |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Las Palomas Senior Living provide?
Las Palomas Senior Living is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Mesa, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 111 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Las Palomas Senior Living?
No. We publish state licensing details for Las Palomas Senior Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Las Palomas Senior Living cost?
Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. The starting prices it publishes are in the Prices section on this page.
How do I contact Las Palomas Senior Living?
Use Las Palomas Senior Living's website, spectrumretirement.com/laspalomas-senior-living-az-mesa, or visit at 9050 East Brown Road, Mesa, AZ 85207.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid