Garden Enclave Assisted Living Homes

Last inspection

March 27, 2026

Inspections

6, 38 deficiencies cited

Complaint inspections

4, 3 with deficiencies cited

Enforcement cases

3, $7,000 in civil penalties

• License active since 2024

Enforcement cases

• September 15, 2026: Civil Penalty $3,500 (in process); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case finalized
• July 16, 2025: Civil Penalty $1,000 (complete) case closed (complete)
• January 27, 2025: Civil Penalty $2,500 (in process) case finalized

March 27, 2026: complaint inspection, 15 deficiencies

• Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
  Based on documentation review, observation, interview, and record review, the governing authority failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery, for two of four sampled staff. The deficient practice posed a risk if a staff member was not properly trained to assist a resident who had fallen and was unable to recover independently.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 1, 2026
• Administration R9-10-803.A.3.b.i-ii
  Based on documentation review, observation, interview, and record review, the governing authority failed to designate, in writing, a manager who had a certificate as an assisted living facility manager. The deficient practice posed a risk as the assisted living facility did not have a certified manager for 24 days.
  Plan of correction rejected
• Administration R9-10-803.A.6.a-b
  Based on observation, interview, record review, and documentation review, the governing authority failed to designate, in writing, an acting manager who had the qualifications established in subsection (A)(3), if the manager was expected not to be present on the assisted living facility’s premises for more than 30 calendar days, or not present on the assisted living facility’s premises for more than 30 calendar days. The deficient practice posed a risk as the assisted living facility did not have an active and present manager.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 1, 2026
• Administration R9-10-803.A.9
  Based on documentation review, observation, interview, and record review, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-411(A) and (C)(1-3), for two of four sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were a danger to a vulnerable population.
  Plan of correction rejected
• Personnel R9-10-806.A.2.a-b
  Based on observation, interview, record review, and documentation review, the manager failed to ensure an assistant caregiver interacted with residents under the supervision of a manager or caregiver. The deficient practice posed a risk as residents were alone with individuals who were not certified caregivers.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 20, 2026

May 9, 2025: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 16 deficiencies

• Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
  Based on the documentation review, record review, and interview the manager of an assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in Arizona Revised Statute (A.R.S.) § 36-420.04(A)(1) through (9) for three of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the emergency responder was not aware of critical health information for a resident.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: December 1, 2025
• Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.1-2
  Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution failed to establish, document, and implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities including annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents and staff.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 1, 2025
• Administration R9-10-803.D.1-4
  Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the location at which a copy of the most recent Department inspection report and any plan of correction resulting from the Department inspection could be found, was conspicuously posted.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 28, 2025
• Quality Management R9-10-804.3
  Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the report required in subsection (2) was maintained for at least 12 months after the date the report was submitted to the governing authority.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 26, 2025
• Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113, for three of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a TB exposure risk to residents and the Department was unable to determine substantial compliance as the documentation was not provided during the inspection.
  Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 1, 2025

November 19, 2024: complaint inspection, 7 deficiencies

• Personnel R9-10-806.A.2.b
  Based on documentation review, observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an assistant caregiver interacted with residents under the supervision of a manager or caregiver. The deficient practice posed a risk as E3 was not qualified to provide the required services unsupervised.
  Plan of correction accepted
• Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
  Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained of the caregivers and assistant caregivers working each day, including the hours worked. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no documentation to identify the staff present each day to ensure the health and safety of residents.
  Plan of correction accepted
• Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
  Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to maintain a personnel record for each employee which included the items required by this rule, for two of four employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as required information could not be verified for two employees.
  Plan of correction accepted
• Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a.i-iii
  Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the assisted living facility to include whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, for three of three sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if staff were unable to meet the needs of residents.
  Plan of correction accepted
• Medical Records R9-10-811.A.1
  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the manager failed to ensure a medical record was established and maintained for each resident according to A.R.S. Title 12, Chapter 13, Article 7.1 for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the required information could not be verified.
  Plan of correction accepted
• Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a.i-ii
  Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a means of exiting the facility controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident.
  Plan of correction accepted
• R9-10-816.B.3.c R9-10-816.B.3.c
  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication administered to a resident was documented in the resident's medical record, for three of three sampled residents who received medication administration.
  Plan of correction accepted

Other inspection reports

• February 5, 2025: complaint inspection. On March 11, 2026, an off-site review of the plan of correction (POC) was conducted. Although, some of the POC requirements were not met, the POC was accepted for all citations due to the compliance inspection conducted May 9, 2025. Read the Statement of Deficiencies on AZ Care Check.

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

• May 22, 2024: initial monitoring inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site abbreviated initial follow-up inspection conducted on May 22, 2024.
• February 15, 2024: compliance (initial) inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site initial inspection conducted on February 15, 2024.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.