Assisted Living
Desert Springs Communities
6662 East Delmon Drive, Mesa, AZ 85215 · Map
Licensed for 10 residents
Desert Springs Communities is a state-licensed assisted living community in Mesa, Arizona. It is licensed for 10 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What Desert Springs Communities says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Feb 28, 2025. See the record
License
Active, 10 residents
Assisted Living Home-Directed AL5077H.
Nearest emergency room
3.1 miles
Banner Baywood Medical Center, rated 2 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desert Springs Communities this community | 10 | Not published | Active | 31 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases | |
| Royalty Home Care Solutions | 0.3 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 6 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases |
| Citrus Villa Mesa Assisted Living | 0.5 mi | 6 | Not published | Active | 1 deficiency, 0 enforcement cases |
| Good Shepherd Assisted Living | 0.6 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 6 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
| Peaceful and Comfort Assisted Living | 0.8 mi | 9 | Not published | Active | 14 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
State inspection record31 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
- Last inspection
- February 28, 2025
- Inspections
- 3, 31 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 3, 3 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 3, $2,750 in civil penalties
- License active since 2004
Enforcement cases
- February 20, 2025: Civil Penalty $1,500 (complete) case closed (complete)
- August 16, 2024: Civil Penalty $1,000 (complete) case closed (complete)
- November 2, 2023: Civil Penalty $250 (complete) case closed (complete)
February 28, 2025: complaint inspection, 10 deficiencies
- Administration R9-10-803.J.2
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 10, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 28, 2025 - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 23, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.iii
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: December 12, 2024 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 18, 2025
Show all 9
- Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 18, 2025 - Medical Records R9-10-811.A.1
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 15, 2025 - Directed Care Services R9-10-815.C.6.a-b
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: January 20, 2025 - and 2 more in the report
December 11, 2024: complaint inspection, 10 deficiencies
- Administration R9-10-803.J.2
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to immediately report suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation according to A.R.S. § 46-454. The deficient practice posed a risk of a potential resident rights violation if the resident was subjected to abuse.
Plan of correction accepted - Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a manager or caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113 for one of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted - Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the assisted living facility for one of two sampled residents. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.
Plan of correction accepted - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.iii
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan was updated at least once every three months, for one of three residents reviewed who received directed care services. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to the resident if the employees did not know what services the resident needed.
Plan of correction accepted - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan included the signature and date from the resident or representative, for one of three residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk if the resident or representative did not acknowledge the services that were to be provided.
Plan of correction accepted
Show all 9
- Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the caregiver documented the services provided in the resident's medical record, for one of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan.
Plan of correction accepted - Medical Records R9-10-811.A.1
Based on observation, documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medical record was maintained for each resident according to A.R.S. Title 12, Chapter 13, Article 7.1, for one of three residents requested. The deficient practice posed a risk as required information could not be verified and the Department was unable to determine substantial compliance during the inspection.
Plan of correction accepted - Directed Care Services R9-10-815.C.6.a-b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan included documentation of the resident's weight or documentation from a medical practitioner stating weighing the resident was contraindicated for a resident receiving directed care services. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to the residents.
Plan of correction accepted - and 2 more in the report
May 31, 2024: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 11 deficiencies
- Administration R9-10-803.A.7
Based on document review, observation, record review and interview, the governing authority failed to notify the Department according to A.R.S. § 36-425(I), which required immediate notification to the Department in writing, identifying the name and qualifications of the new manager when there was a change in the manager.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 10, 2024 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services, for two of two caregivers sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the caregivers were unable to meet a resident's needs.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 5, 2024 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided current documentation of first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training before providing assisted living services, for two of two caregivers sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a caregiver was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 5, 2024 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.1
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan was completed no later than 14 calendar days after the resident's date of acceptance for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no service plan to direct services to be provided to a resident within the required timeframe.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: September 15, 2024 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan included the signature and date from the resident or representative, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk if the resident or representative did not acknowledge the services that were to be provided.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 6, 2024
Show all 9
- R9-10-816.B.3.b R9-10-816.B.3.b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a medication was administered in compliance with a medication order, for one of one residents receiving medication administration sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 7, 2024 - R9-10-816.C.4.a R9-10-816.C.4.a
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the assistance in self-administration of medication provided to a resident was provided in compliance with an order, for one of one resident sampled receiving assistance in self-administration of medication reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 7, 2024 - R9-10-816.D.1 R9-10-816.D.1
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure a current drug reference guide was available for use by personnel members.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 8, 2024 - and 3 more in the report
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 10 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Home-Directed
- License number
- AL5077H
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 10
- County
- Maricopa County
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.1 mi, nursing home 2.6 mi, pharmacy 0.2 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Banner Baywood Medical Center, Mesa. 3.1 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 2 of 5 stars.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Alta Mesa Health and Rehabilitation, Mesa. 2.6 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Aegis Homecare, Inc, Mesa. 5.3 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- CVS Pharmacy. 0.2 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 85215 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- 032509 East Valley Dialysis (Fmc), Mesa, 3.0 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Davita Power Road Dialysis Pd, Mesa, 3.1 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Gilbert Dialysis Center, Gilbert, 5.6 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 66 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85215.
Blue Sky Hospice, Inc, office in Mesa, 2.1 miles away, straight line
Ability Hospice, office in Mesa, 2.4 miles away, straight line
Enhabit Hospice, office in Mesa, 3.0 miles away, straight line - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Banner Urgent Care Services LLC, Mesa. 4.7 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Zone X: 0.2% annual chance (500-year) flood area (moderate risk). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire very low, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in February 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here very low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Desert Springs Communities provide?
Desert Springs Communities is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Mesa, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 10 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Desert Springs Communities?
No. We publish state licensing details for Desert Springs Communities but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Desert Springs Communities cost?
Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Desert Springs Communities does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Desert Springs Communities?
Use Desert Springs Communities's website, desertspringscommunities.com, or visit at 6662 East Delmon Drive, Mesa, AZ 85215.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid