Assisted Living
Cottages of Tucson
619 West Chula Vista Road, Tucson, AZ 85704 · Map
Licensed for 80 residents
Cottages of Tucson is a state-licensed assisted living community in Tucson, Arizona. It is licensed for 80 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Aug 7, 2026. See the record
License
Active, 80 residents
Assisted Living Center-Directed AL12559C.
Nearest emergency room
3.7 miles
Northwest Medical Center, rated 2 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cottages of Tucson this community | 80 | Not published | Active | 28 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases | |
| Venezia Place | 0.3 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 12 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
| Agave Hills | 0.4 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 7 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases |
| Villa de Hope | 0.5 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | No record |
| Sedona Sunset Assisted Living | 0.6 mi | 10 | Not published | Active | 2 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
State inspection record28 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
- Last inspection
- August 7, 2026
- Inspections
- 8, 28 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 7, 4 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 3, $2,500 in civil penalties
- No deficiencies cited at the last 2 inspections (May 2026 to August 2026)
- License active since 2023
Enforcement cases
- August 12, 2026: Civil Penalty $750 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
- August 12, 2026: Civil Penalty $250 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)
- August 25, 2025: Civil Penalty $1,500 (complete) case closed (complete)
May 14, 2026: complaint inspection, 2 deficiencies
- Administration R9-10-803.J.1-6
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, after the manager had a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 46-454, to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to report the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of the resident according to A.R.S. § 46-454. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to assess if there was an immediate health and safety concern for residents who resided in the assisted living facility.
Approved - Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.D.2.a-f
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented an event in which a resident had an accident, emergency or injury and needed medical services, as required per R9-10-819.D.2.a-f. The deficient practice posed a potential risk as an incident was not documented in a timely manner.
Approved
March 3, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 4 deficiencies
- Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.iii
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan was updated at least once every three months for one of three residents reviewed who received directed care services. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to the resident if the employees did not know what services the resident needed.
Approved - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.5.a-d
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan that, when initially developed and when updated, was signed and dated by the resident or resident’s representative, the manager, and the nurse or medical practitioner who reviewed the service plan, for three of three residents sampled.
Approved - Directed Care Services R9-10-815.C.6.a-b
Based on record review and interview the manager failed to ensure a service plan included documentation of the resident's weight or documentation from a medical practitioner stating weighing the resident was contraindicated, for three of three residents sampled receiving directed care services.
Approved - Environmental Standards R9-10-820.A.11
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility were maintained in a locked area, labeled, and inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
Approved
May 22, 2025: complaint inspection, 7 deficiencies
- Administration R9-10-803.A.9
Based on record review and interview, the Governing Authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411 by failing to make documented good faith efforts to contact previous employers to obtain information or recommendations which may be relevant to a person's fitness to work in a residential care institution. The deficient practice posed a risk if E3, E4, E6, E7, or E8 was a danger to a vulnerable population.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 26, 2025 - Quality Management R9-10-804.2.a-b
Based on document review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a documented report identifying concerns about the delivery of services, and any changes or actions taken, was submitted to the governing authority.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 26, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provided physical health services or behavioral health services for two of five certified caregivers. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet a resident's needs.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 26, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee included documentation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training (CPR) for one of nine caregivers and assistant caregivers sampled.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 22, 2025 - Directed Care Services R9-10-815.F.2.a-c
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, controlled or alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 22, 2025 - Medication Services R9-10-816.B.3.a-c
Based on record review and interview the manager failed to ensure medication was administered to a resident in compliance with a medication order, and documented in the medical record. The deficient practice posed a risk if the resident experienced a change in condition due to improper administration of medication.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 26, 2025 - Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-818.D.1
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver immediately notified a resident's primary care provider when a resident had an accident, emergency, or injury that resulted in the resident needing medical services.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 26, 2025
February 13, 2025: complaint inspection, 11 deficiencies
- Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.D
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the assisted living center failed to maintain a copy of the documentation provided to an emergency responder, for four of four residents sampled for whom an emergency responder had been contacted.
Poc resubmitted; correction date given by the community: February 21, 2025 - Administration R9-10-803.A.9
Based on record review and interview, the Governing Authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411 by failing to make documented good faith efforts to contact previous employers to obtain information or recommendations that may be relevant to a person's fitness to work in a residential care institution. The deficient practice posed a risk if E3 was a danger to a vulnerable population.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 21, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided current documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training certification specific to adults, prior to providing assisted living services to a resident for one of three personnel members sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if an employee was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
Poc resubmitted; correction date given by the community: February 25, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver who was expected to have more than eight hours per week of direct interaction with residents, provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis on or before the date the individual began providing services at the assisted living facility. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 27, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.a-g
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or assistant caregiver documented services provided in the resident's medical record.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 1, 2025
Show all 9
- Administration R9-10-803.C.1.r
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures were implemented to protect the health and safety of a resident covering assistance in the self-administration of medication and medication administration.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 14, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
Based on document review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's or assistant caregiver’s skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provided physical health services or behavioral health services for one of three certified caregivers and one of one assistant caregiver’s sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet a resident's needs.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 14, 2025 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.b
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan which included the level of service the resident is expected to receive, for three of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the service plan did not reinforce and clarify services to be provided to a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: February 17, 2025 - and 3 more in the report
Inspections with no deficiencies listed
- August 7, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00179650 conducted on August 7, 2026.
- May 18, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00169979 and 00170106 conducted on May 18, 2026.
- May 12, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00167837 conducted on May 12, 2026.
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 80 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Center-Directed
- License number
- AL12559C
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 80
- County
- Pima County
- Executive Director
- Betsy McCoy
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Executive Director name from the operator's website, as of Oct 12, 2026.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.7 mi, nursing home 1.5 mi, pharmacy 1.3 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Northwest Medical Center, Tucson. 3.7 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 2 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Casas Adobes Post Acute Rehab Center, Tucson. 1.5 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Bayada Home Health Care, Inc, Tucson. 0.2 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walmart Pharmacy. 1.3 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 85704 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- 032613 Northwest Tucson Dialysis (Fmc), Tucson, 2.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Northwest Tucson Dialysis, Tucson, 3.1 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032514 Desert Dialysis Center (Dci), Tucson, 4.7 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 36 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85704.
Anthem East LLC, office in Tucson, 0.4 miles away, straight line
Casa De La Luz Hospice, office in Tucson, 1.0 mile away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Bayada Hospice, office in Tucson, 2.5 miles away, straight line - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Banner-University Medical Group, Tucson. 4.2 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively high, wildfire relatively low, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in May 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
- How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
- Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
- For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
- Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | Could not read the site |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Cottages of Tucson provide?
Cottages of Tucson is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Tucson, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 80 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Cottages of Tucson?
No. We publish state licensing details for Cottages of Tucson but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Cottages of Tucson cost?
Assisted Living in Arizona typically starts at $3,450 to $5,250 a month. Based on 88 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Cottages of Tucson does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Cottages of Tucson?
Use Cottages of Tucson's website, vineyardparkliving.com/find-a-community/vineyard-park-cottages-tucson, or visit at 619 West Chula Vista Road, Tucson, AZ 85704.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid