Lilisity

Assisted Living

Cest Lavie Home

3043 West Butler Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85051 · Map
Licensed for 10 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Cest Lavie Home is a state-licensed assisted living community in Phoenix, Arizona. It is licensed for 10 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
10 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living home-directed
$3,400 to $4,900/moTypical assisted living start in Maricopa County, from 65 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

24Deficiencies cited
4Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Aug 28, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 10 residents

Assisted Living Home-Directed AL13210H.

Nearest emergency room

2.8 miles

Abrazo Central Campus, rated 2 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Cest Lavie Home this community10Not publishedActive24 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
West Lane Home0.6 mi5Not publishedActive5 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Jmj Adult Care Home0.7 mi10Not publishedActive23 deficiencies, 4 enforcement cases
Maria's Garden Care Home0.9 mi10Not publishedActive13 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Ohana Adult Care Home1.0 mi10Not publishedActive8 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
State inspection record24 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Last inspection
August 28, 2026
Inspections
6, 24 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
4, 4 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
1, $1,250 in civil penalties
  • License active since 2024

Enforcement cases

  • June 30, 2026: Civil Penalty $1,250 (complete); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case closed (complete)

August 28, 2026: complaint inspection, 3 deficiencies

  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.1-5
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a service plan that was established, documented, and implemented that included a description of the resident’s medical or health problems and the amount, type, and frequency of medication administration, for one of four residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the service plan did not reinforce and clarify services to be provided to a resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 5, 2026
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.C.11
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident’s medical record contained documentation of assisted living services provided to the resident, for two of four residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if services provided could not be verified.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 5, 2026
  • Personal Care Services R9-10-814.F.1
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the service plan for a resident receiving personal care services included skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections, for four of four residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident's service plan did not include the services to be provided.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 5, 2026

May 4, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 12 deficiencies

  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9
    Based on record review and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in A.R.S § 36-420.04.A.1-9, for two of two residents sampled.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 19, 2026
  • Administration R9-10-803.J.1-6
    Based on documentation review and interview, after having a reasonable basis to believe abuse had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to report the suspected abuse of a resident according to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 46-454. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to assess if there was an immediate health and safety concern for residents who resided in the assisted living facility.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 3, 2026
  • Quality Management R9-10-804.1.a-e
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a plan was implemented for an ongoing quality management program. The deficient practice posed a risk as a quality management program documents the necessary information required to effectively manage services provided.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 3, 2026
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a manager provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) on or before the date the individual began providing services at the assisted living facility and as specified in R9-10-113, for one of two personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 19, 2026
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.A.1-2
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113 before or within seven calendar days after the resident’s date of occupancy, for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: May 6, 2026
Show all 9
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that before or at the time of acceptance of an individual, the individual submitted documentation that was dated 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by an assisted living facility and included whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints and was signed and dated by a medical practitioner, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident’s needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 19, 2026
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.G.2.a-b
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to issue a 14- calendar-day written notice of termination for nonpayment of fees, charges, or deposit, for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if a resident was not aware of the terms of termination.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 3, 2026
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.1
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a established and documented service plan no later than 14 calendar days after the resident's date of acceptance, for one of four residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no service plan to direct services to be provided to a resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 3, 2026
  • and 4 more in the report

July 24, 2025: complaint inspection, 3 deficiencies

  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
    Based on record review and interview the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or assistant caregiver documented the services in the resident's medical record.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 25, 2025
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.3.b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the level of service the resident is expected to receive.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 30, 2025
  • Resident Rights R9-10-810.B.1
    Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident was treated with dignity, respect, and consideration.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 3, 2025

June 16, 2025: complaint inspection, 6 deficiencies

  • Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 3, 2025
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.9
    Based on record review and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411. The deficient practice posed a risk if E1 was a danger to a vulnerable population.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: October 3, 2025
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.G.2.a-b
    Based on record review, documentation review and interview, the manager terminated a resident without notice who was not exhibiting behaviors that were an immediate threat to the health and safety of the resident or other individuals in the assisted living facility.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 2, 2026
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.A.1
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a written service plan was completed no later than 14 calendar days after the resident's date of acceptance, for R2. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no service plan to direct the services to be provided to a resident.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 20, 2025
  • Food Services R9-10-818.C.4.a
    Based on observation and interview the manager failed to ensure that food was obtained, prepared, served, and stored with potentially hazardous food being refrigerated at a temperature maintained at 41° F or below. The deficient practice posed a risk for potential food borne illnesses.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 2, 2026
  • Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.D.2.a-f
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manger failed to ensure that a caregiver immediately notified a resident’s emergency contact, primary care provider, and document the date and time of the accident or emergency, a description of the accident, emergency, or injury, actions taken by the caregiver, the individuals notified by the caregiver, and action taken to prevent the accident, emergency or injury from occurring in the future.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: March 2, 2026

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

  • March 27, 2025: initial monitoring inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site abbreviated initial follow-up inspection conducted on March 27, 2025.
  • October 1, 2024: compliance (initial) inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site initial inspection conducted on October 1, 2024 and the off-site documentation review completed on October 2, 2024.

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 10 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Home-Directed
License number
AL13210H
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
10

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.8 mi, nursing home 2.0 mi, pharmacy 0.7 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Abrazo Central Campus, Phoenix. 2.8 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 2 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Horizon Post Acute and Rehabilitation Center, Glendale. 2.0 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Strong Hold Home Health, Inc., Phoenix. 1.1 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 0.7 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 85051 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
032550 North Phoenix Dialysis (Fmc), Phoenix, 1.4 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
Davita Brookwood Dialysis Center, Glendale, 1.6 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 1 of 5 stars)
032646-Fmc-Glendale Town Center, Glendale, 2.3 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Hospice
69 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85051.
Omegalife Hospice Of Arizona, Inc, office in Phoenix, 1.1 miles away, straight line
D'Amore Hospice, LLC, office in Phoenix, 1.1 miles away, straight line
Good Samaritan Hospice, office in Phoenix, 1.1 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Honorhealth Medical Group, LLC, Phoenix. 3.1 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Zone X: 0.2% annual chance (500-year) flood area (moderate risk). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively low, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in August 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  4. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  5. What fees are charged at move-in?
  6. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
  7. How long have the executive director and the head of care been here?
  8. Who gives medications, and what training do they have?
  9. For what reasons can a resident be asked to leave?
  10. Is the apartment held during a hospital stay, and at what cost?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: no FEMA wildfire rating of moderate or higher here
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Cest Lavie Home provide?

Cest Lavie Home is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Phoenix, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 10 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Cest Lavie Home?

No. We publish state licensing details for Cest Lavie Home but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Cest Lavie Home cost?

Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Cest Lavie Home does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Cest Lavie Home?

Visit Cest Lavie Home at 3043 West Butler Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85051.

Choosing assisted livingOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid