Lilisity

Assisted Living

Canyon Assisted Living

750 East Grand Canyon Drive, Chandler, AZ 85249 · Map
Licensed for 5 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

Canyon Assisted Living is a state-licensed assisted living community in Chandler, Arizona. It is licensed for 5 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
5 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living home-directed
$3,400 to $4,900/moTypical assisted living start in Maricopa County, from 65 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

37Deficiencies cited
1Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Jul 16, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 5 residents

Assisted Living Home-Directed AL12035H.

Nearest emergency room

3.3 miles

Banner Ocotillo Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
Canyon Assisted Living this community5Not publishedActive37 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
AZ Ohana Care Home0.4 mi5Not publishedActive0 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
Markesh Care Home0.7 mi5Not publishedActive21 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
Heart of Compassion Assisted Living0.8 mi5Not publishedActive3 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
Archangel Assisted Living II0.8 mi5Not publishedActive4 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case
State inspection record37 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
Last inspection
July 16, 2026
Inspections
2, 37 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
1, 1 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
2, $4,750 in civil penalties
  • License active since 2021

Enforcement cases

  • October 6, 2026: Civil Penalty $2,500 (in process); Notice of Enforcement Action (complete) case finalized
  • August 14, 2024: Civil Penalty $2,250 (complete) case closed (complete)

July 16, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection, 24 deficiencies

  • Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
    Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the health care institution's chief administrative officer failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities, which included annual training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB, for one of three applicable personnel reviewed, and annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious TB. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
    Plan of correction submitted; correction date given by the community: July 20, 2026
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.3.b.i-ii
    Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the governing authority failed to designate, in writing, a manager who had either a certificate as an assisted living facility manager issued under A.R.S. § 36-446.04(C). The deficient practice posed a risk as the assisted living facility did not have a certified manager from July 10-16, 2024.
    Plan of correction submitted; correction date given by the community: October 15, 2026
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.7
    Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the governing authority failed to notify the Department when there was a change in the manager. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to ensure the facility maintained a qualified manager.
    Plan of correction submitted; correction date given by the community: October 15, 2026
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.9
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411, for four of four personnel records reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were a danger to a vulnerable population.
    Plan of correction submitted; correction date given by the community: July 21, 2026
  • Administration R9-10-803.C.3
    Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures were reviewed at least once every three years and updated as needed. The deficient practice posed a risk as policies and procedures reinforce and clarify standards expected of employees.
    Plan of correction submitted; correction date given by the community: October 26, 2026
Show all 9
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
    Based on record review, documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that before providing assisted living services to a resident, a caregiver's and an assistant caregiver’s skills and knowledge were verified and documented, for two of two applicable personnel reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet residents’ needs.
    Plan of correction submitted; correction date given by the community: July 18, 2026
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
    Based on observation, documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained for at least 12 months after the last date on the documentation of the caregivers and assistant caregivers working each day, including the hours worked by each. The deficient practice posed a risk as the documentation did not accurately identify if qualified staff were present each day to ensure the health and safety of residents.
    Plan of correction submitted; correction date given by the community: July 19, 2026
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Based on documentation review, record review, observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver who was expected to have more than eight hours per week of direct interaction with residents, provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) on or before the date the individual began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility, and as specified in R9-10-113, for two of three personnel records reviewed. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
    Plan of correction submitted; correction date given by the community: July 20, 2026
  • and 16 more in the report

July 10, 2024: compliance (annual) inspection, 13 deficiencies

  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
    Based on observation, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained of the caregivers and assistant caregivers working each day, including the hours worked by each. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no documentation to identify the staff that was present each day to ensure the health and safety of residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 10, 2024
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an employee provided documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) on or before the date the individual began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility, as specified in R9-10-113, for one of three employees reviewed. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 10, 2024
  • Personnel R9-10-806.B.4.a-b
    Based on observation, record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a trained caregiver was present on the assisted living facility's premises when the manager was not present. The deficient practice posed a risk as no qualified employee was present to meet a resident's needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 10, 2024
  • Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record for each employee included the individual's starting date of employment, for one of three employee records reviewed.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 10, 2024
  • Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a personnel record was available for one of two employees reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as required information could not be verified for E4.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 11, 2024
Show all 9
  • Service Plans R9-10-808.C.1.g
    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the caregiver documented the services provided in the resident's medical record, for one of two residents reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as services could not be verified as provided against a service plan.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 10, 2024
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.C.17
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident medical record contained documentation of notification of the resident of the availability of vaccination for influenza (flu) and pneumonia, according to A.R.S. § 36-406(1)(d), to one of one resident reviewed. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 11, 2024
  • Directed Care Services R9-10-815.C.6.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan included documentation of the resident's weight or documentation from a medical practitioner stating weighing the resident was contraindicated, for one of one resident reviewed receiving directed care services. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to the residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 10, 2024
  • and 5 more in the report

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Home-Directed
License number
AL12035H
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
5

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 3.3 mi, nursing home 4.3 mi, pharmacy 0.3 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Banner Ocotillo Medical Center, Chandler. 3.3 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Archstone Care Center, Chandler. 4.3 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Stokes Home Health Care, Chandler. 2.4 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 0.3 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 85249 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
Davita Ocotillo Dialysis, Chandler, 1.9 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
032579 Sun Lakes Dialysis (Fmc), Sun Lakes, 3.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032516 Chandler Dialysis (Fmc), Chandler, 4.5 miles away, straight line (has a shift starting after 5 pm; CMS rating 1 of 5 stars)
Hospice
85 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85249.
Sapphire Hospice, office in Chandler, 3.4 miles away, straight line
A Tlc Hospice LLC, office in Chandler, 3.7 miles away, straight line
Prism Hospice, office in Chandler, 4.8 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Sjhmc Physician Services, Chandler. 4.1 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively low; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Zone X: 0.2% annual chance (500-year) flood area (moderate risk). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively low. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively low, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in July 2026. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: FEMA rates wildfire risk here relatively low
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Canyon Assisted Living provide?

Canyon Assisted Living is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Chandler, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 5 residents.

Does Lilisity rate Canyon Assisted Living?

No. We publish state licensing details for Canyon Assisted Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does Canyon Assisted Living cost?

Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Canyon Assisted Living does not publish its prices.

How do I contact Canyon Assisted Living?

Visit Canyon Assisted Living at 750 East Grand Canyon Drive, Chandler, AZ 85249.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid