Assisted Living
Baraka at Rosegardens II Assisted Living
10702 East Nido Avenue, Mesa, AZ 85209 · Map
Licensed for 5 residents
Baraka at Rosegardens II Assisted Living is a state-licensed assisted living community in Mesa, Arizona. It is licensed for 5 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.
Prices
This community does not publish its prices.
Area costs
Care and services
From the community’s website
What Baraka at Rosegardens II Assisted Living says about itself, quoted from its own site. We have not checked these claims against licensing records. Ask about each one on a tour.
- Offers respite or short-term stays.
We had to have some respite for both of them.
(page, checked Oct 12, 2026)
Lilisity’s independent report
What the public record shows
Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.
State inspections
Last inspection: Jul 14, 2025. See the record
License
Active, 5 residents
Assisted Living Home-Directed AL11403H.
Nearest emergency room
1.9 miles
Honorhealth Four Peaks Medical Center, rated 2 of 5 stars by CMS.
Side by side with nearby communities
The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.
| Community | Distance | Licensed capacity | Published starting price | License | Inspection citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baraka at Rosegardens II Assisted Living this community | 5 | Not published | Active | 28 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases | |
| Blessed Assisted Living Home | 0.0 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 3 deficiencies, 1 enforcement case |
| Blessed Assisted Living Home - Mesa | 0.0 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 2 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases |
| Mulberry Assisted Living-Nido | 0.1 mi | 5 | Not published | Active | 6 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases |
| Mulberry Assisted Living | 0.2 mi | 4 | Not published | Active | 0 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases |
State inspection record28 deficiencies, 2 enforcement cases
- Last inspection
- July 14, 2025
- Inspections
- 2, 28 deficiencies cited
- Complaint inspections
- 0, 0 with deficiencies cited
- Enforcement cases
- 2, $5,500 in civil penalties
- License active since 2020
Enforcement cases
- September 24, 2025: Civil Penalty $5,250 (complete) case closed (complete)
- August 19, 2024: Civil Penalty $250 (complete) case closed (complete)
July 14, 2025: compliance (annual) inspection, 20 deficiencies
- Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document A.R.S. § 36-420.04.C
Based on the documentation review, record review, and interview the manager of an assisted living home failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that included the information prescribed in Arizona Revised Statute (A.R.S.) § 36-420.04(A)(1) through (9) for two of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the emergency responder was not aware of critical health information for a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 31, 2025 - Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.2.a-f
Based on documentation review and interview, the health care institution's chief administrative officer failed to ensure the health care institution documented and implemented tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities required in R9-10-113(A)(2)(d).
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 31, 2025 - Administration R9-10-803.L.1.a-c
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained any information provided by the hospice service agency or a copy of follow-up instructions provided to the resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 31, 2025 - Quality Management R9-10-804.2.a-b
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to submit a documented report to the governing authority that included an identification of each concern about the delivery of services related to resident care, and any change made or action taken as a result of the identification of a concern about the delivery of services related to resident care. The deficient practice posed a risk as a quality management program documents the necessary information required to effectively manage services provided.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 31, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.A.2.a-b
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that an assistant caregiver interacted with residents under the supervision of a manager or caregiver, for two of three assistant caregivers reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as the individuals were not qualified to provide the required services, and the department was provided with false and misleading documentation.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 17, 2025
Show all 9
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
Based on observation, interview, and documentation review, the manager failed to ensure that documentation was maintained of the caregivers and assistant caregivers working each day, including the hours worked by each. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no documentation to identify the staff that was present each day to ensure the health and safety of residents, and the department was provided with false and misleading documentation.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 1, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.B.4.a-b
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a trained caregiver was present on the assisted living facility's premises when the manager was not present. The deficient practice posed a risk as no qualified employee was present to meet a resident's needs, and the department was provided false and misleading documentation.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 20, 2025 - Personnel R9-10-806.C.1.a-c
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a complete personnel record was available for two of eight personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as required information could not be verified, and the department was provided false and misleading documentation.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 17, 2025 - and 12 more in the report
July 18, 2024: compliance (annual) inspection, 8 deficiencies
- Personnel R9-10-806.A.7
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure documentation was maintained for at least 12 months after the last date on the documentation of the caregivers and assistance caregivers working each day, included the hours worked by each. The deficient practice posed a risk as there was no documentation to identify if qualified staff were present each day to ensure the health and safety of residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 20, 2024 - Service Plans R9-10-808.A.4.b.iii
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident had a written service plan that was reviewed and updated at least once every three months for a resident receiving directed care services for one of two residents sampled.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 25, 2024 - Medical Records R9-10-811.C.12
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident's medical record contained a medication order from a medical practitioner for each medication that was administered to the resident for one of two residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as medication administered could not be verified against a medication order.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 9, 2024 - R9-10-816.F.1 R9-10-816.F.1
Based on observation, documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure medications stored by the facility were stored in a separate locked room, closet, cabinet, or self-contained unit. The deficient practice posed a risk to residents who were not prescribed the accessible medication.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 8, 2024 - R9-10-818.A.2 R9-10-818.A.2
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the disaster plan was reviewed at least once every 12 months. The deficient practice posed a risk as a disaster plan reinforces and clarifies standards expected of employees.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 1, 2024
Show all 8
- R9-10-818.F.4.a.i-iv R9-10-818.F.4.a.i-iv
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a smoke detector was tested at least once a month. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to the residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: August 1, 2024 - R9-10-819.A.6 R9-10-819.A.6
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that hot water temperatures were maintained between 95º F and 120º F in areas of an assisted living facility used by residents. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk for residents.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 25, 2024 - R9-10-819.A.11 R9-10-819.A.11
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility were maintained in a locked area inaccessible to residents. The deficient practice posed a risk to the physical health and safety of a resident.
Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: July 25, 2024
Read the full record on AZ Care Check →
ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 5 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.
License and ownershipActive license
- License type
- Assisted Living Home-Directed
- License number
- AL11403H
- License status
- Active
- Licensed capacity
- 5
- County
- Maricopa County
Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.
Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs
How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona
- Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)
Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.
Location and nearby careNearest hospital 1.9 mi, nursing home 2.6 mi, pharmacy 0.7 mi
- Nearest hospital with an emergency room
- Honorhealth Four Peaks Medical Center, Mesa. 1.9 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 2 of 5 stars. Location approximate.
- Nearest Medicare nursing home
- Apache Junction Health Center, Apache Junction. 2.6 miles away, straight line.
- Nearest home health agency office
- Aegis Homecare, Inc, Mesa. 4.3 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
- Nearest pharmacy
- Walgreens. 0.7 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
- Area
- USDA classes ZIP code 85209 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
- Dialysis within 15 miles
- Davita Mountain Vista Dialysis Center Of Arizona, Mesa, 1.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars)
032578 Apache Junction Dialysis (Fmc), Apache Junction, 3.9 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Davita Power Road Dialysis Pd, Mesa, 5.5 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 3 of 5 stars) - Hospice
- 90 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85209.
Azorna Hospice And Palliative Care, office in Mesa, 1.9 miles away, straight line
Aegis Hospice, Inc., office in Mesa, 4.3 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars)
Hospice At Home Of Arizona, LLC, office in Mesa, 4.9 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 4 of 5 stars) - Nearest geriatric medicine practice
- Banner Urgent Care Services LLC, Mesa. 6.9 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.
Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.
Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively moderate; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas
Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.
- Flood zone
- Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
- Wildfire risk to homes
- In Mesa, AZ, risk to homes is greater than 40% of communities in Arizona and 78% of communities nationwide. USDA rates the whole town or city, not this address. (USDA Forest Service, Wildfire Risk to Communities, April 2026)
- FEMA National Risk Index
- Overall: relatively moderate. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding relatively moderate, wildfire relatively moderate, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake very low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)
A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.
Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record
Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.
- The state recorded a finding in July 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
- What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
- Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
- Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
- Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
- Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
- How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
- What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
- What fees are charged at move-in?
- How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked12 public sources we searched, with dates
Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.
| Source | Data as of | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection records | Oct 15, 2026 | See above |
| U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour cases | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016 | Oct 15, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| FEMA flood map | See above | |
| USDA wildfire risk | Apr 15, 2026 | See above |
| FEMA National Risk Index | See above | |
| CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmacies | See above | |
| HUD Multifamily Properties - Assisted | Jul 6, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory) | Sep 20, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Hospice - General Information | Aug 19, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| CMS Home Health Care Agencies | May 27, 2026 | Nothing on record |
| The community’s own website | See above |
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does Baraka at Rosegardens II Assisted Living provide?
Baraka at Rosegardens II Assisted Living is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Mesa, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 5 residents.
Does Lilisity rate Baraka at Rosegardens II Assisted Living?
No. We publish state licensing details for Baraka at Rosegardens II Assisted Living but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.
How much does Baraka at Rosegardens II Assisted Living cost?
Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. Baraka at Rosegardens II Assisted Living does not publish its prices.
How do I contact Baraka at Rosegardens II Assisted Living?
Use Baraka at Rosegardens II Assisted Living's website, barakacarehomes.com, or visit at 10702 East Nido Avenue, Mesa, AZ 85209.
How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid